Posted on 01/28/2005 9:31:52 AM PST by neverdem
The Second Amendment will always need to be defended against gun grabbers, now and in perpetuity, and for so long as the Republic exists.
"audience of about 30 people"?
" An armed society is a polite society" Robert Heinlein
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have
for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote."
Benjamin Franklin
WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!!!! Full auto weapons are NOT illegal in most states. The 1934 National Firearms Act (NFA) allows any adult who lives in a state where such ownership is legal to buy a full auto gun if they pay a $200 tax, get the permission of a local law enforcement agency, register the gun and go through a background check. I have friends, acquaintances and clients who own full autos. There are something like 200,000 legally-registered full auto guns (called "machine guns" under the NFA, even though most of them are more accurately described as "sub-machineguns"). Barr only diminishes his argument by being inaccurate.
Oh, BTW, since 1934 there has only been 1 documented case of a legally registered machine gun being used in the commission of a crime - and that was by a police officer!
Correction to Post #8: any adult who doesn't have a felony conviction and who meets the other criteria.
Ahhh, what a wonderful thing consistency in thought is. The second half of her sentence contradicts the first half.
Unfortunately, you can only get ones that were made before 1986. The supply is severely limited, with items running about 10x what they should be. While there techinically isn't a MG ban ("just pay your $200 tax"), in all practicality there is. You can't afford an M16 or AK47 or MP5, and simply cannot get an M4 or P90 or MP7 or anything else made post-'86.
They left just enough legal MGs to obfuscate and deflate any "they're all banned - that's unconstitutional!" arguments.
Then, will she "allow" her neighbors to have a guns in their homes? That seems the question.
You are both right. However I would hesitate to condemn Bob Barr too much. He is at least half right. The 200,000 or so NFA registered machine guns are very expensive to acquire. Not that many people can afford one even if they can get their police chiefs to sign off on one. Your average gang banger just can't walk into a gun store and pick one up. There are no NEW machine guns being manufactured which are sold to the general public. For all intents and purposes, machine guns are pretty much illegal. If you tried to convert the Min-14 in your closet to an automatic weapon, you could find yourself in a world of trouble with the BATF.
Could Barr have better explained the situation? Sure.
This is one reason Barr got canned.... The statement is reminiscent of a democrat.... His mustache didn't help either.
Emory was the home of Professor Michael Bellisiles, author of the infamous book/study challenging the prevailing wisdaom that gun ownership was common in colonial America. Hiw work was immediately touted by the gun grabbers as proof that the Second Amendment was not intended to guarantee an individual right to bear arms.
When the bona fides of Bellisiles' research came under fire, Emory did the responsible thing and pointed a committee of scholars to investigate his work. The committee concluded that the research supporting the work could not be substantiated, and Bellisiles ultimately resigned in disgrace. The publisher withdrew his book, and Columbia University rescinded a history prize it had awarded to Bellisiles.
The ever-clownish Ninth Circus actually cited the Bellisiles book in its opinion holding that the Second Amendment guaranteed only a collective, not an individual, right to bear arms. It had to very quickly pull the opinion and put out an amended opinion dropping the citation when Bellisiles work was denounced.
US Code Title 18 Section 922(o) bans civilian possession of any made after 1986. The limited supply of pre-'86 ones is wearing out and being overpriced by increasing demand. A new real M16 should cost about $500; you'll pay about $15,000 for a well-worn >20-year-old one.
For most practical purposes, MGs are illegal.
"No where in the Bible does it say we are guaranteed life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Also, it doesn't mention the right to bear arms. That being said, I agree with everything else Barr said. We can't let the government gently erode our civil liberties."
This has very little to do with the Bible. He is talking about "natural" rights. Given to us at birth. Google up some pages on natural rights and you will find lots of info on this subject.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.