Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Additional pictures of damage to USS San Francisco, SSN-711
Submarine Photo Index ^

Posted on 01/28/2005 9:31:00 AM PST by Bean Counter

Edited on 01/28/2005 9:39:14 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: newgeezer
(Even the photo caption was wrong ...


"The U.S.S. San Francisco limps back into port, damaged by a drunk driver."

41 posted on 01/28/2005 2:14:04 PM PST by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas; neverdem; Howlin; Petronski; fastattacksailor
Copper was in the old paints.

Then some more effective, less expensive, tin-based paints became very popular, but the enviro's complained. (Paint (in harbors) "might" fall off the boats and commercial ships, and "might" land on the bottom, and "might" get eaten by crustaceans -> fish -> people.

So they banned the more effective -> less bottom growth -> less water resistance -> less fuel-consuming -> less pollution paint to protect the environment. Much more expensive!
42 posted on 01/28/2005 5:27:01 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

Fiberglass.

Sorry but that is the way my spell checker spells it although I prefer your spelling. :-)


43 posted on 01/28/2005 6:55:11 PM PST by El Gran Salseron ( The replies by this poster are meant for self-amusement only. Read at your own risk. :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: El Gran Salseron

The bottom is Mare Island Red, mostly because the folks working on the hull while waterborne find it easier to see.


44 posted on 01/29/2005 2:01:56 AM PST by passingthought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: VaFederalist

Actually, they probably won't decom her. She is one of 3 subs forward deployed to Guam (Houston and City of Corpus Christi being the others). The Navy wants to maintain a strong forward presence in the Far East region, and subs based out of Guam are vital to that effort. If I hear right, they will take one of her allready decommed sister ships, the Atlanta, and chop the forward ends off both boats and pretty much switch them around. That makes sense if you look at it logically, because the Atlanta (sitting in the boneyard in Washington) was allready like other decommed nuclear boats, she was due to be cut up for scrap anyhow. It would be a huge expense to do the alternative... decomm her, cut her up for scrap too, and then move another boat with its crew and their families out to Guam. Think of the force realignment problems from that.


45 posted on 03/08/2005 8:37:16 AM PST by arizonasubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson