Skip to comments.
AP: Gitmo Soldier Details Sexual Tactics
AP via Yahoo News ^
| Jan 27 2005
| Paisley Dodds
Posted on 01/27/2005 11:27:40 AM PST by pickemuphere
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-163 next last
To: pickemuphere
"If I don't tell you anything are you going to hold it against me?"
121
posted on
01/27/2005 12:44:47 PM PST
by
spiffy
To: nevergore
Here, maybe you need to see it in true Technicolor?
LOL, I almost thrwe up a couple times making this...
122
posted on
01/27/2005 12:45:58 PM PST
by
Echo Talon
(http://echotalon.blogspot.com/)
To: pickemuphere
AP: Gitmo Soldier Details Sexual Tactics AP via Yahoo News ^ | Jan 27 2005 | Paisley Dodds Paisley?
123
posted on
01/27/2005 12:47:46 PM PST
by
verity
(The Liberal Media is America's Enemy)
To: some_semblence_of_sanity
" However many of them were picked up on rumors.Would you care to offer any proof of this statement? If not, I will have to assume that this is proprganda.
124
posted on
01/27/2005 12:58:37 PM PST
by
SCALEMAN
(Super Cards/Rams Fan)
Comment #125 Removed by Moderator
To: some_semblence_of_sanity
Waiting patiently for proof that these detainees were picked up on rumors only.
126
posted on
01/27/2005 1:04:09 PM PST
by
SCALEMAN
(Super Cards/Rams Fan)
To: rellimpank
127
posted on
01/27/2005 1:06:49 PM PST
by
ßuddaßudd
(7 days - 7 ways (but you must follow the instructions carefully))
To: BikerNYC
And can one use it to obtain the coveted "fake red wings" for your colors?
128
posted on
01/27/2005 1:12:05 PM PST
by
ASA Vet
(Those who know, don't talk. Those who talk, don't know.)
Comment #129 Removed by Moderator
To: pickemuphere
Bill Clinton didn't think that was torture when Monica snapped her thong.
130
posted on
01/27/2005 1:15:23 PM PST
by
Palladin
(Proud to be a FReeper!)
Comment #131 Removed by Moderator
To: Thebaddog
There is no equivalent proscription against homosexual man-love in the good book of theirs.Really?
And Lot! (Remember) when he said unto his folk: Will ye commit abomination such as no creature ever did before you?
Lo! ye come with lust unto men instead of women. Nay, but ye are wanton folk.
- 7:80-81
What! Of all creatures do ye come unto the males,
And leave the wives your Lord created for you ? Nay, but ye are froward folk.
- 26:165-166
Must ye needs lust after men instead of women ? Nay, but ye are folk who act senselessly.
- 27:54
And Lot! (Remember) when he said unto his folk: Lo! ye commit lewdness such as no creature did before you.
For come ye not in unto males, and cut ye not the road (for travellers), and commit ye not abomination in your meetings ? But the answer of his folk was only that they said: Bring Allah's doom upon us if thou art a truthteller!
- 29:28-29
132
posted on
01/27/2005 1:17:11 PM PST
by
Chemist_Geek
("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
To: pickemuphere
Why is everyone joking? This is serious. My wife has got me to agree to doing more projects around the house then I can count with this same method. Minus the red wings though.
133
posted on
01/27/2005 1:19:17 PM PST
by
lbmorris11
(America defeating terrorism and Liberalism)
To: mlbford2
To: some_semblence_of_sanity
" Obviously they were not caught red-handed. Since they were not caught red-handed, in all likelihood someone tipped the military off to them" It's not obvious to me. Sort of tortured reasoning here. Make an unsubstantiated statement, then use it 'prove' something else.
"Innocent until proven guilty" is THE axiom of the western justice system"
You have evidently never been in the Military, or been audited by the IRS. I believe that these detainees have been classified as POW's, therefore don't come under the Judicial system.
135
posted on
01/27/2005 1:26:39 PM PST
by
SCALEMAN
(Super Cards/Rams Fan)
To: some_semblence_of_sanity
They were captured on the field of battle. We simply do not ship everyone to Gitmo. No way. They are not innocent.
They are prisoners in a war. We do not hold trials and play patty-cake with POWs, so this innocent until proven argument holds no water. This is NOT a law enforcement issue (like the Clinon's approached it), this is a war and a military operations.
Big difference.
Morally? Yeah, right, the conventions were agreed with the premise that we will treat you nice if you treat us nice. If they bad guys do not adhere to the conventions then we are no longer bound by them. That is the argument why we keep to the conventions; we treat them nice so we expect our guys to be treated nice. Our guys are being abused and murdered, and the enemy is not a recognized combatant so therefore, the implied and explicit agreement is null and void. We are no longer "morally" bound to treat them any better than they treat us. . .but we do.
This angst over things that EMBARRASS them is complete and utter nonsense.
To: some_semblence_of_sanity
DING_DING_DING---We have a troll (Jan 27 2005)
To: Gunrunner2
"DING_DING_DING---We have a troll (Jan 27 2005) "Wondered when someone would sound the alarm.
138
posted on
01/27/2005 1:33:38 PM PST
by
SCALEMAN
(Super Cards/Rams Fan)
To: SCALEMAN
Yeah. . .but they are fun to play with for a while. . .and in this nutters case, the fun ran out when his logic never materialized.
To: Junior
One of my sailors dressed in a mini-skirt and thong. I had to explain to him it was inappropriate. Was his name Klinger?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-163 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson