Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A note on the Armanious case
jihadwatch.org ^ | January 24, 2005 | www.jihadwatch.com

Posted on 01/24/2005 9:07:31 PM PST by indcons

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last
To: Dark Skies; jan in Colorado
In this case, it strikes me that the accuser knows the accusation is unfounded but, with no way of winning the argument legitimately, the accuser is trying to destroy the debate itself by reducing it to a name calling contest (which is a victory of sorts).

Or puts words into peoples mouths and conducts straw man arguments that do not address the real concerns or issues at hand.

I too have come to the conclusion that some peoples real motivation is to provoke and seek conflict by using the name calling tactics of the left instead of replying with more reasoned and well thought out responses.

61 posted on 01/25/2005 3:33:48 PM PST by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Former Dodger

And we infidels must not let it go away..it's the least we can do for the victims..and for our own communities.


62 posted on 01/25/2005 6:40:23 PM PST by ariamne (reformed liberal-Shieldmaiden of the Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson