Posted on 01/24/2005 6:41:28 PM PST by F14 Pilot
ping
Hold on. "an excuse for openly supporting terrorist organizations?" I thought they're already doing that.
Islamic Regime in Tehran denies its involvements in global terrorism...
Which is why they can't be allowed to have nuclear weapons. The consequences would be disastrous.
But everyone can see right through that. At least I hope so.
I don't read Hersh, but I DO read Ledeen.
Have you seen this thread?
You might be interested, if you haven't.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1325430/posts
It's good to see you. ;o)
The last sound they will hear on the phone will be a sharp whistle.
Whenever a Islamicist says you're about to make a mistake, you know you're on the right track.
Elections there in a week. It's a testament to the falsity of that claim.
Yes, the regime tries to deny it.
But that's really tuff to do every February when they all get together there, isn't it?
They're like the thief who is caught on video tape stealing, who then goes around telling everyone he's innocent. Why do they bother? Everyone in the world knows they are guilty. It's asinine.
Good article. I agree. Except i think that Iraq is headed towards a democratic regime, however the situation in Iraq is different than Iran. There is absolutely no need or desire for an attack on Iran.
"Writing in the Jan. 20 issue of the New Yorker, leading investigative writer Seymour Hersh.."
The New Yorker?? Seymour Hersh??
Nuff said.
Isn't Iran worse than Iraq? The regime is worse than Saddam. They bascially preach "Death to America" everyday.
The regime in Iran is far worse than Saddam, but the situation in Iran is far different. Iran has a long history of fighting for democracy. There are consistent pro-Democracy demonstrations in Iran - 70% of the population are under 30 - polls put the regimes support at about 15% and the younger generation are pro-American. A revolt works much better when dealing with Iran.
Then maybe what we need to do is weaken is infrastructure of the government to give the Iranian people a chance.
That's definitely the best option. I'm sure we're already doing some things.
Iranian-Americans have satellite tv stations setup in California that reach an estimated 5-10 million homes in Iran. There are currently over 20 Persian Satellite TV stations. They're bootleg operations that are pro-US and pro-Democracy, but have wide appeal and outreach. They're illegal and the Iranian government regularly raids homes, but they simply cannot keep up with the production. They're also instrumental in getting people out into the streets. Iran is no North Korea - the people are well aware of things happening due to these satellite dishes.
The problem is that the 15% loyal hard-liners are *extremely* devout. They feel that they're protecting God himself and will do anything to defend the regime. They'd kill anyone, including themselves to defend the regime.
15% is more than enough to keep power - especially when the world media hardly pays attention and the Europeans, Chinese, Russians and most of the rest of the world are backing you.
SYS0013: Encountered "leading investigative writer Seymour Hersh" where [reliable source] was expected.
Then maybe we should work to eliminate the hard-liners.
Do you think an attack on Iran would trigger a response from Russia and/or China?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.