Posted on 01/23/2005 6:21:54 PM PST by Brian Allen
"The media are helping terrorists".
So are the Democrats.
FYI
I'm sure there are others who will remember a video with a panel of media people who were being ask questions. Peter Jennings and Mike Wallace are the only 2 I can remember.
Mike Wallace was asked what he would do if he was with a group of military and they were about to be attacked. Would Mike alert the military - or just shoot the story of the attack.
MIKE WALLACE SAID HE WOULD JUST SHOOT THE STORY.
At first Jennings didn't agree .. but later (being the weenie he is), he agreed with Wallace.
That to me says everything! Even when I saw the video - I was stunned that he would not try to save our soldiers by telling them they were about to be attacked.
Then .. these are the same type of people who carry coffins to shame the President ..??
They share a common goal: The defeat of the U.S. war effort.
And the media wondered why they were booed at the Presidents inaugural parade?
There are some in the media that should be in jail!
The Decline Of The Legacy Media. It couldn't happen to a more deserving institution.
I think the Captain changed it to SKY NEWS (the Fox counterpart in Britain) if the media reports were correct.
It's been very noticeable that all the news services--although perhaps AP is the worst offender--regularly run photographs of terrorists going about their business of committing such crimes as shooting innocent people in the head. They just stand there, while the terrorists wearing their black masks walk up to Iraqi election workers or other innocents, and cold-bloodedly shoot them while the photographers snap their pictures and send them back to AP.
What should we make of this? Obviously, these photographers are friends and sympathizers with the terrorists, or it would hardly be safe for them to stand there and take these kinds of pictures.
In a sane world, the proper name for this kind of behavior is COMPLICITY IN MURDER. Also, TREASON, since the murderers are our declared enemies. The chief executives of AP are just as guilty as the Muslim killers they hire to write their stories and take their pictures.
More confirmation of why I detest the MSM.
That was from an Annenburg/CPB show called Ethics in America.
You may also remember how pissed off the Marine Officers got when these pieces of shi'ite said that their professionalism outweighed their obligations as citizens.
What a heaping load that was!
Yeah, I remember - and Mike said something about "they couldn't take sides".
These were their own countrymen - and they wouldn't take sides with them ..?? I was in shock for days after that program. I hated the media then and I still do - and I don't trust any of them - even FOX.
ping
"Whatever their true motives, rather than inform Coalition forces of an impending attack these French journalists chose to collaborate with the terrorists. This is a truly shocking example of journalistic bigotry. What we need to know, however, is whether or not it is representative of the media. I’m afraid it is."
"The corrupt CBS pulled a similar stroke when its David Hawkins visited Iraq and met with fully armed terrorists who planned to murder American troops. So why didn’t Hawkins alert the military? Because he doesn’t care if these thugs murder US soldiers. According to this patriot the US shouldn’t be in Iraq anyway. Because of Hawkins refusal to do the moral and patriotic thing a number of US soldiers and Iraqis might now be dead."
Seems to me they are treading on very thin ice here. At which point can we declare that certain media personnel are actively collaborating or aiding the enemy and hence should lose the protection of being the press? Seems to me that in these cases, they should be treated as the enemy and killed.
And Hawkins should be brought up on treason charges and then executed if soldiers were killed due to his involvement with these terrorists.
The Democrats and the media are the internal terrorists of this country. They aid and abet terrorism....
Terrorists seek publicity but not necessarily their identities exposed. The goal of the reporter is to get the picture or get the story. Sometimes to get the picture they may cozy up to or befriend terrorists. That a reporter would chose getting the picture of soldiers being killed over informing the soldiers of an upcoming attack it's logical to assume that the reporter may tell a terrorist where the soldiers are located or vulnerable. The reporter is void of moral ethics. His or her ethics are what it takes to get the story at seemingly any cost, including death of soldiers that are fighting terrorists.
Ping
Not really new to us, but still nice to see it in print.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.