This ping list is not author-specific for articles I'd like to share. Some for perfect moral clarity, some for provocative thoughts; or simply interesting articles I'd hate to miss myself. (I don't have to agree with the author 100% to feel the need to share an article.) I will try not to abuse the ping list and not to annoy you too much, but on some days there is more of good stuff that is worthy attention. I keep separate PING lists for my favorite authors Victor Davis Hanson, Lee Harris, David Warren, Orson Scott Card. You are welcome in or out, just freepmail me (and note which PING list you are talking about).
BTTT.
Always brilliant - the estimable Charles Krauthammer - who understands history and anticipates the future with clarity.
I wish he had addressed the part that the European Union might aspire to occupy in this realignment.
Bump for later...
This is why I think Bush is thinking about a new association of democracies as a post-cold war architecture that can act as a counterweight and magnet, otherwise Bush's inaugural speech has been characterized by Peggy Noonan as "mission inebriation":
"My own 2 cents speculation is that Bush is laying the foundation for some kind of association among democracies that is more effective than the U.N., that will not be intimidated if necessary by China's huge population (25% of the globe) with their coming exertion of economic and military influence, and that this lessens the prospects that one democracy can be played off against another in dealing with North Korea and Iran and even Russia if Putin goes authoritarian."
..."If Al Qaeda saw that they could not isolate the U.S. among Muslims but would be facing this larger association of democracies of which Afghanistan and hopefully soon Iraq would be part of, this might make the dreams of a global Caliphate appear hopelessly utopian and marginalize the little following they would have left. If would also support the democratic movement inside of Iran because they would not want to be left out."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1325360/posts
It's time to can the Woodrow Wilson diplomacy and return to the Theordore Roosevelt diplomacy....
and it should start with retaking the Panama Canal at the first excuse we get.
I must raise two questions. First, if Japan is still our ally, wouldn't they feel the need to militarize themselves to check China?
The Sino-Cuban and -Iranian coalitions may not work as well as they would like. Fidel is about to be gone, and I doubt Cuba will remain communist after his demise. Iran is bubbling underneath the surface. I believe the Mullahs' days are numbered. So my second question is wouldn't a post-mullah Iran and a post-Castro Cuba actually work in our favor?
Real men don't whine.
Yes but we have many in this Country that would rather go along to get along, than fight for our Freedom.
Oh, boy, Charles K. reminds us what time it is.
I love and admire this Pulitzer Prize winner!...
Krauthammer ping.
Just wow.
we should beware of Chinese-inspired Islamist "distractions" that will force us to divert money and resources away from watching THEM.
Charles Krauthammer - is simpy THE BEST
Charles Krauthammer - is simply THE BEST
Ping
It may be a little too late - forces are in play right now. We need to be much more viligent.
I've been thinking the same things but Charles Krauthammer says it so much better. Keep your eye on the China/Iran allienace. China gets oil and Iran gets cheap consumer goods plus nuclear and military technology.
This is very dangerous for our MidEast oil supply.
PING
at least some people are starting to understand China, that they are an enemy of the US. now if only more people would understand how they are using so-called "free trade" as a weapon against the US economy, we might have a better chance at taking them on before our industrial and technology base dissappears.