Skip to comments.
STATEMENT OF MARY MAPES
The Wall Street Journal ^
| 1/10/05
| MARY MAPES
Posted on 01/11/2005 5:00:22 AM PST by Brilliant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-175 next last
Comment #1 Removed by Moderator
To: Brilliant; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
his actions are motivated by corporate and political considerations -- ratings rather than journalism And this is MAPES saying this?!?
HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!
But I guess she wasn't looking for ratings when she ran that hit piece, she was trying to make sure her man Kerry won the Presidential election.
2
posted on
01/11/2005 5:03:29 AM PST
by
OXENinFLA
To: Brilliant
3
posted on
01/11/2005 5:03:51 AM PST
by
mgc1122
To: Brilliant
It is noteworthy the panel did not conclude that these documents are false. The new liberal talking point....
4
posted on
01/11/2005 5:03:52 AM PST
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: Brilliant
5
posted on
01/11/2005 5:04:53 AM PST
by
Mike Bates
(Start the New Year with a good book. Modesty prevents me from suggesting which one.)
To: Brilliant
That Mapes won't admit she was rolled with fake documents prove her firing was just.
6
posted on
01/11/2005 5:05:16 AM PST
by
angkor
To: Brilliant
She brings up a bunch of red herrings about the original documents (of course there are none) and these copies, and says nothing about the fact that Free Republic's own poster, the Honorable buckhead, debunked the whole story in just a few hours. Mary Mapes, at long last, have you no sense of decency?
7
posted on
01/11/2005 5:07:19 AM PST
by
elhombrelibre
(Liberalism is proof that intelligent people can ignore as much as the ignorant.)
To: OXENinFLA
8
posted on
01/11/2005 5:07:23 AM PST
by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
To: Drango
They did not conclude the documents were false...
Yes, and that just reinforces the perception that this was a whitewash, just as does their conclusion that the false report was not politically motivated. It also reinforces the perception of liberal bias at CBS.
These guys have done very little, if anything, to redeem their credibility with this report.
9
posted on
01/11/2005 5:08:19 AM PST
by
Brilliant
To: OXENinFLA
"to put all investigative reporting in the CBS tradition at risk".
What tradition would that be? Falsifying documents and deploying partisan political hit squads?
10
posted on
01/11/2005 5:08:38 AM PST
by
Arkie2
To: Brilliant
I believe the segment presented to the American people facts they were free to accept or reject, and that as those facts were presented, there was nothing that was false or misleading. Maybe she was fired for wasting time?
11
posted on
01/11/2005 5:08:40 AM PST
by
alrea
To: angkor
I posted this earlier:
(Rather's) confidence in Mapes may have led him to go with the story, despite the red flags. After all, it was Mapes who brought CBS the Abu Ghraib photos of prisoner abuse and who risked jail by refusing to turn over videotapes of Rather's interview with a man charged in the 1998 dragging death of James Byrd, Jr. in Jasper, Texas.
But Mapes' father sees a political agenda behind his daughter's work. Don Mapes, 76, was a recent guest on a radio talk show hosted by John Carlson on KVI in Seattle.
He said, "I'm really ashamed of what my daughter has become. She's a typical liberal. She went into journalism with an ax to grind, and that was to promote radical feminism."
He confessed to being disappointed in his daughter's role in the controversy. He said, "When I heard about 60 Minutes, I suspected she would be the producer of the show."
12
posted on
01/11/2005 5:08:51 AM PST
by
ProudVet77
(If it's Saturday, I'm sailing!)
To: nuconvert
Denial At CBS it's not just a river in Egypt, it's the status quo...........
To: OXENinFLA
Once again, I would like to thank Buckhead for immediately exposing the falsehood attempted to be perpetrated by CBS.
14
posted on
01/11/2005 5:09:07 AM PST
by
The Sons of Liberty
(Four More Years! - GOD Bless America and GOD Bless the Swift Vets! and to hell with Osama!)
To: OXENinFLA
his actions are motivated by corporate and political considerations -- ratings rather than journalism And this is MAPES saying this?!?
Wanna prove your motives were pure, Mapes?
Turn over your rolodex so we can see in the Bush campaign was in there like Lockhart's number was.
15
posted on
01/11/2005 5:09:28 AM PST
by
woofer
To: Brilliant
So the new logic seems to be that in the absence of definite proof that they made up a story based on faked evidence their fairy tales stands.
I can only hope that they keep this kind of crap up. By 2012 the Democratic party will consist of whatever votes they can muster in Boston and San Francisco.
16
posted on
01/11/2005 5:10:04 AM PST
by
An Old Marine
(Freedom isn't Free)
To: OXENinFLA
What did they know and when did they know it?
17
posted on
01/11/2005 5:10:44 AM PST
by
bmwcyle
(Washington DC RINO Hunting Guide)
To: angkor
Mapes believes falsehoods are being reported about her nationwide... how delightfully ironic.
18
posted on
01/11/2005 5:11:15 AM PST
by
Bryher1
To: woofer
I still don't think that angle of the scandal has been explored enough. What was the connection between her and the Kerry campaign? Don't forget the Kerry campaign had ads based on that story ready to go right after her piece was run.
To: OXENinFLA
"At CBS it's not just a river in Egypt, it's the status quo..........."
Ain't that the truth
20
posted on
01/11/2005 5:12:08 AM PST
by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-175 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson