Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President names Mack, Breaux to lead group seeking ways to reshape code
CNN ^ | January 7, 2005 | Unknown

Posted on 01/07/2005 8:08:18 AM PST by Melpomene

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
A Bloomberg article I read made it sound like Bush was pushing towards a consumption-based tax than an income-based tax.
1 posted on 01/07/2005 8:08:19 AM PST by Melpomene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Melpomene

Looks like a wise political move


2 posted on 01/07/2005 8:11:24 AM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melpomene

Way to go Dubya! Appoint a commitee made up professional politicians that screwed up the system in the first place. Reminds me of CBS investigating CBS.


3 posted on 01/07/2005 8:17:46 AM PST by Bar-Face
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bar-Face

At least they both support tax cuts.


4 posted on 01/07/2005 8:27:52 AM PST by Melpomene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bar-Face

Amen. Where is Bill Archer on this? Herman Cain? Looks like the fix is already in. How did Breaux land on this job? Bush's love for Democrats will utimately doom the Republicans.


5 posted on 01/07/2005 8:32:41 AM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad



If you want anyone to take the recommendations with some seriousness, you must put up people that congress will respect and it must appear to be two party. Breaux is a middle of the road southern democrat. He helped pass Bush's tax cuts in previous years and was known as a guy that could bring both sides together. I think breaux is a good choice


6 posted on 01/07/2005 8:43:06 AM PST by jbwbubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bar-Face

Breaux is a good guy. Bash someone else!


7 posted on 01/07/2005 8:51:42 AM PST by OldFriend (PRAY FOR MAJ. TAMMY DUCKWORTH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Melpomene

Probably it makes sense to put politicians rather than economists in charge. The economists will crunch the numbers, but the politicians must judge what can be done within the bounds of political possibility.


8 posted on 01/07/2005 9:22:05 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jbwbubba

I am sorry, the only way to make the process serious is to do serious and accurate research. The politics should be peripheral, especially from Republicans. We need folks who have done serious academic and policy work in taxation to head the panel, not lifetime politicians. The only politics I am willing to consider is not between Republican and Democrat, but between flat-tax or consumption tax. The only politicians on this panel should be proponents of either plan, not ones who will derail both. Expect no tax simplification.


9 posted on 01/07/2005 10:09:32 AM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

The bounds of political possibility will be determined by the winners in elections. Remember, Republicans have already won. Why suck up to Democrats now?


10 posted on 01/07/2005 10:10:34 AM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Melpomene; ancient_geezer
A Bloomberg article I read made it sound like Bush was pushing towards a consumption-based tax than an income-based tax.

While I would prefer an NRST over an income tax, it is worth pointing out that in the language of economists, a flat income tax is considered a "consumption tax".

11 posted on 01/07/2005 10:13:44 AM PST by kevkrom (If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melpomene
The article says the panel is to have a report by the end of July and Treasury will review and report to the President by the end of 2005.

BTW, I love this poo-pooing inserted in the article:

That means that popular deductions for millions of Americans -- like interest payments on home mortgages and charitable contributions, among others -- could be affected.

I view this paragraph as an effort to drum up opposition.

12 posted on 01/07/2005 10:15:40 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Breaux scores 36% by NTU on tax-lowering policies

http://www.issues2000.org/Economic/John_Breaux_Tax_Reform.htm

13 posted on 01/07/2005 10:17:41 AM PST by palmer ("Oh you heartless gloaters")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Melpomene; Taxman; Principled; Bigun; EternalVigilance; kevkrom; n-tres-ted; Poohbah; CliffC; ...
A Taxreform bump for you all.

If you would like to be added to this ping list let me know.

John Linder in the House & Saxby Chambliss Senate, offer a comprehensive bill to kill all income and SS/Medicare payroll taxes outright, and provide a IRS free replacement in the form of a retail sales tax:

H.R.25, S.1493
A bill to promote freedom, fairness, and economic opportunity by repealing the income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, and enacting a national retail sales tax to be administered primarily by the States.

Refer for additional information: http://www.fairtax.org, http://www.salestax.org & http://www.geocities.com/cmcofer/ftax.html


14 posted on 01/07/2005 10:48:20 AM PST by ancient_geezer (Don't reform it, Replace it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad

Do you think these two guys are going to do all the work themselves? They will hire the kind of people you recommend. Then Mack and Breaux will work to get the support.


15 posted on 01/07/2005 11:17:01 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot

You mis-understood me. These career politicians will not do the independent and rigorous research you need to do. Again, the politics should be between flat-tax or consumption tax if Bush is sincere about tax-reform. With career politicians it will be more about politics than tax-reform. I would put Bill Archer, Bill Tauzin, Dick Armey, Herman Cain, Jack Kemp - politicians who are at the fore-front of tax-reform. I don't think John Breaux ever uttered those two words, and probably neither did Connie Mack. Politicians who are serious about tax-reform should have been put in charge. I can guarantee you that if Kerry won and if he wanted to do tax-reform, then Paul Krugman will be in charge.


16 posted on 01/07/2005 12:46:19 PM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer

Please put me on your ping list.


17 posted on 01/07/2005 1:03:48 PM PST by groanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

"That means that popular deductions for millions of Americans -- like interest payments on home mortgages and charitable contributions, among others -- could be affected.

I view this paragraph as an effort to drum up opposition."

I view the paragraph as completely idiotic. We don't need "popular deductions" if we don't have income tax.

National Sales Tax is the way to go!!


18 posted on 01/07/2005 1:24:25 PM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: shubi
I view the paragraph as completely idiotic. We don't need "popular deductions" if we don't have income tax.

Exactly

19 posted on 01/07/2005 1:26:23 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: shubi

I agree.
It is amazing how many people are willing to give a no interest loan to the feds and then get all excited when they get it back.......clueless.


20 posted on 01/07/2005 1:48:11 PM PST by socialismisinsidious ("A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson