Posted on 01/06/2005 7:39:47 AM PST by PatrickHenry
How is that (Portugese Goa) relevant to the question of the percentage of evolutionists who are queer (which is what you seem to have started off talking about)?
Dr. Sniegowski and Dr. Weisberg (authors of this open letter), your assignment is to write on the blackboard, 500 times, “I will not tell a lie” (see 11/30/2004 entry). Then you must read all four years of back issues of Creation-Evolution Headlines. Anyone who cannot find anything wrong with this letter must also read the back issues before continuing. Selective evidence? Bias? Religious motivation? Such hypocrisy is laughable. How many times do we need to go over this? Go back and read 11/30/2004, 09/29/2004, 08/18/2004, 05/07/2004, 02/27/2004 and the rest of the chain links on Darwinism or Intelligent Design.
As well-meaning as the board’s intentions are, this compromise will not work. Teachers have much more emotional power over the students than administrators. Students view administrators as distant bureaucrats in formidable offices, those mean guys with white shirts and ties that you get sent to when you’re bad. You can just picture a Darwinista teacher smirking as the statement is read over the intercom, whistling a silly tune and rotating his finger around his ear. Students will get the message – ID is crazy, and that it is “cool” to mock it. A few students may glance at the alternate textbook (if they can find one – the Darwinista comrade will conveniently “lose” it), and a small number of students may feel relieved they have official permission to use their brains. But unless there is a charismatic student leader in the classroom willing to stand up to the Darwin-only dogma and attract fellow students to his or her side, most students will just fall in line. The Darwin Party teacher will also have power over grading, and with many and varied subtle techniques, will be able to make any student regret listening to the announcement. Sadly, the policy may backfire, and raise up a class of students even more brainwashed than before. That is why even the pro-ID Discovery Institute considered the policy misguided. Proponents of ID don’t want to mandate their view; they want students to hear both sides and think critically; Darwinists do not. That is the difference: using your brains, or being brainwashed.
The Darwin Party muscles out ID mostly because of bandwagon and bully tactics, not evidence, as we repeatedly demonstrate right here. Unless school boards understand the issues clearly, the Darwinistas will continue to get away with their blustering about science vs. religion, separation of church and state, equating evolution with good science education, threats about jobs and college, and empty promises of medical advances. School boards should first master the baloney detector. Then they must master the history and philosophy of evolutionism. They need to understand clearly the philosophical bases of naturalism, and the fallacies of positivism. They need to expose the religious bias of these philosophies, and be prepared to argue worldviews, not just pieces of evidence. They need to understand the way Darwinists smuggled their philosophy into the definition of science; like physicist Keith Wanser said, “There is not one theory of evolution, but a body of opinions, speculations and methods for interpretation of observational facts so that they fit into the philosophy of naturalism” (see Nov. 2001 quote). After these things, school boards need to devise strategies that empower the students and the teachers to unite against the illegitimate dictatorship of the Darwinista usurpers. It’s as much strategy as knowledge.
The latest Creation Research Society Quarterly has an essay by several authors that provides a primer on the historical and philosophical errors of evolutionism. It points out how philosophical naturalists co-opted Christian assumptions that would otherwise make their own beliefs self-refuting, and how the naturalists pulled a coup over science with misdirection and redefinition of terms. These historical and philosophical issues must be understood before writing education policy. The students need to see this as a revolution against tyranny, against dogmatists who want to brainwash them, who feel the ugly problems with their views must be shielded from students’ tender eyes. Students, parents and school boards need to be equipped to answer the Darwinist propaganda with facts, logic, and a firm grasp of the issues. They need to be able to parry attempts to misdirect the argument, control definitions of terms or bluff around difficulties. They need to defend the right to think and ask questions. They need to stop being intimidated by bluffing, even when signed off by a bandwagon of PhDs. For every open letter like the one sent to the Dover school board, there need to be a dozen reasoned, informed responses. For every ACLU threat, there needs to be a firm show of resolve by citizens who will not be cowed into silence. The Darwinists should be the ones on the defensive; they are trying to push a myth that the universe came from nothing, that life arose by chance, and that all the complexity and beauty of life “arose” through undirected processes without purpose. This is ridiculous on the face of it. They want to maintain their right to tell these stories to kids, without contradiction. The pompous Emperor Charlie is naked. Don’t be afraid to shout the evidence to a docile crowd, trained into thinking they cannot trust their eyes.
From here:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.