Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In the beginning . . . Adam walked with dinosaurs [Creationist Park]
Telegraph.co.uk ^ | 02 January 2005 | James Langton

Posted on 01/02/2005 12:20:11 PM PST by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 941-959 next last
To: general_re
"A few months ago?" That's THIS thread!

(But there was one a bit ago about a theme park in Florida run by that tax evader Hovind.)

121 posted on 01/02/2005 6:52:31 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: longshadow; rwfromkansas

Second that! Would never have guessed the rwfromkansas of 2-3 years back would be making such posts as now.


122 posted on 01/02/2005 6:55:30 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; longshadow
Tempus fugit, or so they say.

Anyway, I propose we draw straws among us for this thread. Loser has to play "UN observer" and hang around while the creationists fling rocks at each other, and then ping the rest of us back when they're tired of beating each other up. Otherwise, I can't see much point in sticking around for the food fight, since it pretty obviously doesn't involve me...

123 posted on 01/02/2005 6:55:37 PM PST by general_re (Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
The point is that to have known Jeremiah before then that speaks to a history.

Yes, it does speak to a history. But you're thinking from a disadvantage - you don't see things as God does. God is extradimensional and outside of time looking in on it. If you built the watch you know when it's going to need rewinding or a new battery. If you're a gear in the watch, all you can see is your function and that of the bits around you whether you understand the whole of it or not. Jeremiah doesn't have to pre-exist for God to know him before he's born. God only needs to observe History standing outside the constraints of time. Time, matter and energy were created by him.

We are told the WORD is God, now that being the case we are given within the WORD a glimpse that there is more to this story than we can see in flesh bodies.

That's the first thing you've said in conversation with me that has any real weight. You aren't God and neither am I. We don't operate on his level or have the intelligence or facts that God possesses. There is more to any story in Scripture than we can see or understand without His intervention. But there is enough there to be instructive. Where you err is in trying to theorize about possible explanations and then dogmatizing your theories as truth. Every time you do that you'll get yourself in trouble. There is no sin in saying "I don't know" when God has not spoken or you don't have any truth upon which to draw. If you find a burning candle and someone asks you how long it's been burning, you can't say unless you have more information.. like how long it's actually been burning, or, it's original size, normal burn rate AND the exact conditions in which it has been burning for the full time. Absent that, "I don't know" is your only correct answer. Anything else is a guess. Pride overcomes wisdom more often than not and instead of "I don't know", people want to say, theoretically x amount of time. And next thing you know, it's been dogmatized and you have to believe it to get to heaven. Same process as evolution. Evolutionists assess "educated guesses" to be as concrete as truth. They are not. Which is why mathmatical theories require proofs. It's why propositions in science must be falsifiable. We spend our whole lives processing and acting upon information. If you're acting on bad information, you're wasting time. If you're proliferating bad information, you're wasting other people's time. When you're doing so in a Christian context, you're risking people's souls. Playing games with people's souls for the sake of your intellectual Vanity is offensive to God - that's why special punishment is reserved for false prophets and false teachers. You're in a war. The enemy has been shelling your position for three days. The shelling stops while your buddy is getting some shut eye and when he wakes up, he notes the absence of enemy fire. You haven't surveyed the situation beyond not hearing any shelling. Your buddy asks, "did we kill them all or are they still there?" You decide that since the shelling stopped and there's no real explanation for why that you're aware of you'll tell him, "they're gone". So he trots out into the open and gets shot. You're now responsible for his death. And of course you wouldn't be so cavalier with your buddy's life. But when you start theorizing and dogmatizing it, you're doing precisely the same thing with his soul which is far worse by comparison. You'd do better to get him shot. At least only his body would be dying.. you risk damning him to hell. Yet you seem to have no concept of the import of any of it and no sense of perspective. If you speak for God when he has not spoken, you will pay for it.

124 posted on 01/02/2005 6:55:53 PM PST by Havoc (Reagan was right and so was McKinley. Down with free trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: general_re
You hadda go blow it just when they were eating their own!
125 posted on 01/02/2005 6:56:31 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
... that tax evader Hovind

Really? Hovind a tax evader? How interesting.

126 posted on 01/02/2005 6:58:05 PM PST by PatrickHenry (The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

Eh, they're not paying attention - too busy hitting each other over the head with Hebrew dictionaries and so forth...


127 posted on 01/02/2005 6:58:19 PM PST by general_re (Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Thanks for the links. I bookmarked both of the sites. I will definitely explore them.
128 posted on 01/02/2005 6:58:31 PM PST by superskunk (Quinn's Law: Liberalism always produces the exact opposite of it's stated intent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

LOL


129 posted on 01/02/2005 7:00:07 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: general_re
I can't see much point in sticking around ...

I've been keeping watch only because I posted the thread in the first place. Sad to see it degenerate, but whatcha gonna do? I suppose I'll drop out before long.

130 posted on 01/02/2005 7:00:49 PM PST by PatrickHenry (The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: general_re

Oh I am paying attention. Not much difference in E's and most C's.


131 posted on 01/02/2005 7:01:05 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

;^)


132 posted on 01/02/2005 7:03:16 PM PST by general_re (Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: general_re

Same to ya.


133 posted on 01/02/2005 7:03:56 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I guess we have to say "alleged tax evader" like they do on TV. "The investigation is ongoing."
134 posted on 01/02/2005 7:04:11 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Well most Christian would not believe what the original actually says, they tell little children a serpent convinced Eve to eat an apple and ignore that Adam and Eve were in a fig grove and whatever they ate caused them to become aware of being naked.

No Bible-reading 'Christian' I know would do that. They all know that there was no "apple" mentioned in Genesis 3, and certainly no "fig groves". They know full well that the account is not metaphoric and they can separate the popular myths which make up your apparent frame of reference (apples, fig leaves) - from the facts of the Scripture.

As for "the original" which you seem curious about, the Hebrew is quite clear what occured. The only people who have a problem with the Genesis account are atheists and those of a liberal theology. Judaism deals with the Genesis account in much the same way as my 'Christian' friends. Only 'Reformed Jews' who are of a more liberal flavor have any different take on the Genesis account. I have to laugh at all the people poking fun at 'Fundamentalist Christians' and their view of Creation - Judaism also holds to those views as well. This is the Hebrew year 5765. All Jews know that it memorializes the years from Creation.
135 posted on 01/02/2005 7:09:03 PM PST by safisoft (Give me Torah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Well, there is this: The Hovind Bankruptcy Decision. And this: IRS Investigating Hovind.
136 posted on 01/02/2005 7:09:27 PM PST by PatrickHenry (The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Really? Hovind a tax evader?

Prefect of Police: "I'm shocked, shocked to learn that there is gambling going on here!"

137 posted on 01/02/2005 7:10:17 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Havoc

Havoc God gave me a brain, and He did not instruct you to tell me if I am or am not using it.

Now either Jeremiah being known and sanctified and ordained before he was born tells that there is a history there or Jeremiah was created a robot.

There is also no sin in being ignorant but it is one to stay that way. So stop preaching to me about things you do not understand.


138 posted on 01/02/2005 7:10:26 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
Just thought I’d leave you with some food for thought to consider when debating Biblical matters with others:

Prov 16:18-19

18 Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.

19 Better it is to be of an humble spirit with the lowly, than to divide the spoil with the proud.
KJV

1 Peter 5:5

5 Likewise, ye younger, submit yourselves unto the elder. Yea, all of you be subject one to another, and be clothed with humility: for God resisteth the proud, and giveth grace to the humble. KJV

Good Night
139 posted on 01/02/2005 7:11:52 PM PST by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: safisoft

Genesis 3:7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked;

and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.


NO fig grove hey?


140 posted on 01/02/2005 7:12:30 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 941-959 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson