Posted on 12/29/2004 6:06:13 AM PST by Brilliant
Bump.
The US, UK, Australian and Japanese governments have already committed close to $150,000,000 combined. That does not include the costs associated with their immediate military assistance (Japanese Navy are helping out, Abraham Lincoln carrier group is on the way, Australian Air Force has been doing around the clock airlifts of supplies etc etc) or emergency supplies they are shipping over. This is just their initial, immediate, cold hard cash being sent to those agencies on the ground right now.
The US, UK, Australian, Japanese and Indian governments are already setting up the plans to coordinate the economic recovery in these countries effected. And when it comes to economic recovery, you know which country will be the main source of support, and the cost of that may well be the largest of them all.
I know here in Australia that the people are opening their hearts and wallets in an amazing way. Millions have been raised by a population of only 20 million. In the business arena, the two largest Australian commercial airliners have donated jets and all the associated flight costs to airlift several plane loads of supplies and medical staff over. The two largest phone companies have said they will not charge the Australian offices of any of the aid agencies involved in the emergency. They will not receive a phone bill for some time. The phone companies have also offered and sent as much equipment and expertise as they can to help communication during the emergency, and help these countries get their long term communication recovery. The list goes on. I am sure there are very similar things happening within the US.
The initial emergency cash & supplies costs are - rightfully so - the whole worlds problem. The long term recovery - as it always does - will come down to only a few.
Sorry, what were the UN and EU up to? $160,000 from France?
Me too.
I would have cut the 15 to 10 for a few days and give them time to reflect..
Well, you got it right anyway; far as I'm concerned the Unitarians can STFU too!
Exactly right. Now that we've caved, you can expect to hear a lot more criticism of US largess in the future. If it were me, I would have at least subtracted the extra relief funds from our UN budget.
Why couldn't we just take the money - even HALF of the money - we give to support the delegates (for lack of a better word) and the UN and give THAT amount to the aid the victims. Surely no one would call us stingy then, would they?
It upsets me, though, that we ended up giving MORE after this jerk's comments. We should have come out with the amounts given by the other countries and stood by our original amount.
I just sent letters to my Senator and Representative informing them that I was refusing to pay any federal income tax until the US withdraws from the UN and expels them from this country. I am sick of this b.s.
As far as I know the 15 million was a starting point. The president just said this will be one of the greatest disasters in history. We will be giving aid to these countries for a long time. We always reach deep, but I resent being told what we need to give.
So a country that has enough money to spend on developing nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles cannot afford to provide emergency housing for it's own victims of natural disasters. And the US is supposed to make up the deficit? Any country that has it's own nuclear weapons doesn't deserve a dime of US aid. If they can't provide for basic relief in their own country they have no business spending any money on nuclear weapons.
I'm not trying to blame the victims here, but a the major cause for underdevelopment and "unmet needs" is corrupt governments, war, badly managed economies, and folks having more kids than they can feed.
If we don't give enough as this clown thinks we should that's because we have expenses too and obligations to our own citizens. We are not bottomless pits of money.
Maybe President Bush should announce he is taking the US portion of the UN membership dues to donate for the relief effort...
Maybe President Bush should announce he is taking the US portion of the UN membership dues to donate for the relief effort...
Maybe President Bush should announce he is taking the US portion of the UN membership dues to donate for the relief effort...
A large part of it is that there are just too many people in the world.
I am upset that we gave more also. I think we should do a GNP analysis of ALL countries in the world and take their donations (both private and government)amounts and list that too. Then we should send each country a statement ( a bill) for their percentage share of their contribution that is due! Can't wait for France, Saudi Arabia, Arafats bankroll, the UN's oil for food monies, China etc. to get their public bill.ha.
If we're going to start shaming countries, let's put the shame where it belongs
The IRS will just take everything you own and give it to the general welfare ( the operative word being "welfare">)
But I think we need to start a movement to allow re-apportioning our tax dollars to allow for NOT contributing to the UN. Not that it would work, but it sure would highlight our under-representation on taxes vis a vis the UN and maybe end up with our cutting back on their support here.
Are we taxing the monies that UN delegates make forthe US treasury?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.