Skip to comments.
Human Gland Probably Evolved From Gills
King's College London via ScienceDaily ^
| 2004-12-07
| Anonymous
Posted on 12/21/2004 4:13:57 PM PST by beavus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-317 next last
To: beavus
Humans are suckers for a good story. So much so that the void of a good story will be filled by a bad one.. Some humans never grow up.. and lacking answers will grasp at straws to fill their story quota.. SOooo, they invented psuedo science.. to force the most loved storys to a logical end, at least a reasonable end.. which they dress up very professionally for to appear very serious. With eye glasses and everything..
Humans.!.. (Eddie Murphy laugh)
21
posted on
12/21/2004 4:40:10 PM PST
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been ok'ed me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: bayourod
In the womb, for a short time, we all have gills.
To: somemoreequalthanothers
"How about maybe the cucumber plant family??"At first it was a possiblity -- until researchers concluded cukes lack the "curvature gene."
To: RightWhale
"Will one day our brains evolve into something useful in a higher creature?" Yes. But, only if we are able to call other celestial bodies...HOME.
24
posted on
12/21/2004 4:43:12 PM PST
by
blam
To: beavus
Human Gland Probably Evolved From Gills ^
Yep,.....Great Theologian was John Gills!
LOL
Merry Christmas Carols Joy!
:-)
/sarcasm
25
posted on
12/21/2004 4:45:35 PM PST
by
maestro
To: Avenger
: : ::keyboard spew!:: : : :
rofl!
26
posted on
12/21/2004 4:46:15 PM PST
by
visualops
(It's easier to build a child than repair an adult.)
To: F16Fighter
Then surely gourds could be a possibility. :)
To: clyde asbury
That's what we were told in high school biology, anyway.
Before you ask or comment - no, thank you, I don't wish to debate with creationists.
To: Jim Robinson
Jim, I'm an atheist, but I'll be damned if that doesn't almost make sense.
29
posted on
12/21/2004 4:48:58 PM PST
by
Melas
To: shubi
Haeckel is one of their boogey men. This article represents some of that evolutionary developmental biology ("evo-devo") which gets mentioned on FR threads sometimes. According to creationists, any idea of embryology relating to anything else is "discredited by science." Meanwhile, scientists haven't got the word.
30
posted on
12/21/2004 4:49:23 PM PST
by
VadeRetro
(Nothing means anything when you go to Hell for knowing what things mean.)
To: Culture_Values_Morality
It's time to get the HIGH boots on.
Once it was apes, then aardvarks and now fish. There's no telling what else we "evolved" from. LOL!
The lengths people go to to defy God is hilarious!
31
posted on
12/21/2004 4:49:51 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: VadeRetro
Yeah, I know. I am a biologist and a minister. ;-)
32
posted on
12/21/2004 4:50:37 PM PST
by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
To: Avenger
This is how evolutionists define science...
The human parathyroid gland, which regulates the level of calcium in the blood, probably evolved from the gills of fish, according to researchers from King's College London.
it is reasonable to suggest
experiments that show that the parathyroid glands of mice and chickens and the gills of zebrafish and dogfish contain many similarities.
Somebody explain to me how "probably" or "resonable to suggest" and "many similarities" constitute scientific evidence that human beings evolved from FISH!
33
posted on
12/21/2004 4:51:20 PM PST
by
highimpact
(The only way to defeat terrorism is to annihilate the terrorists)
To: VadeRetro
Well, of course, that's because it's only "science" if the study is being performed by a graduate of BTIT (Bible Thumpers Institute of Technology).
34
posted on
12/21/2004 4:52:01 PM PST
by
AQGeiger
(Half of my heart is in Iraq.)
To: nmh
Really intelligent people know that evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution explains that fact.
"If sound science appears to contradict the Bible, we may be sure that it is our interpretation of the Bible that is at fault." Christian Observer, 1832, pg. 437
"Christians should look on evolution simply as the method by which God works." Rev. James McCosh, theologian and President of Princeton, 1890
35
posted on
12/21/2004 4:52:11 PM PST
by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
To: beavus
Oh good - the search continues for nonexisting "evidence."
36
posted on
12/21/2004 4:52:58 PM PST
by
DennisR
(Look around - there are countless observable hints that God exists)
To: beavus
I was thinking of another organ that could have been used to suck oxygen while submerged on ones back. I can also submit proof of same as evidenced by one Lewinsky giving ah........never mind
37
posted on
12/21/2004 4:53:04 PM PST
by
Hot Tabasco
(I was born to be naughty and Santa knows it.......must be why I only get socks and underwear)
To: somemoreequalthanothers
"Then surely gourds could be a possibility. :)" Yeah, on 'Mutant Porno Planet' :-D
To: PatrickHenry
Didn't we discuss embryonic gills a year or two ago - how does this play in? or would this be via some preliminary organ duplication in proto-land animals? Just spitballin' - balrog
39
posted on
12/21/2004 4:54:03 PM PST
by
balrog666
(The invisible and the nonexistent look very much alike.)
To: shubi
40
posted on
12/21/2004 4:56:56 PM PST
by
gradient_salient
(EuroDisney should be used as a base of operations against the French)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-317 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson