1 posted on
12/17/2004 9:17:12 AM PST by
placebo11
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
To: placebo11
----TIME PERSON OF THE YEAR: BUSH----
I think you mean he's the MAN
OF THE YEAR,
Time Magazine. -Dan
To: placebo11
76 posted on
12/17/2004 11:50:55 AM PST by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: placebo11
Pharmaceuticals, ramp up on the Prozac! Prepare for more P.E.S.T. fallout!
To: placebo11
Last time I bought Time was about 1965. Flip thru it at airport newstands once a year (max.), and always amazed that anyone would pay to read such biased, mindless trash.
To: placebo11
They may indeed fall back on the nonsense that there is always some 'power' behind Bush because they can't believe he is what he is - makes sense they'd name Rove just to perpetuate the myth.
91 posted on
12/17/2004 12:36:35 PM PST by
Maigret
To: placebo11
92 posted on
12/17/2004 12:50:26 PM PST by
Raycpa
(Alias, VRWC_minion,)
To: placebo11
IF it happens, Moore will be pissed.
93 posted on
12/17/2004 12:53:43 PM PST by
b4its2late
(Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.)
To: placebo11
Time is probably doing it just to whip up the DemonRats into more of a frenzy, if that's possible. It'll be the start of a great draft-Hillary effort. I hope they do. Going hard left has worked so well so far (sarc).
To: placebo11
They'll name Rove. It would be a backhanded slap against Bush. (He just a figurehead, put on the throne by the evil genius, Karl Rove)
99 posted on
12/17/2004 3:24:21 PM PST by
fhayek
To: placebo11
In light of some of the previous loser ... err, "winners" ... I would not want the "honor."
To: placebo11
Buck-head! Buck-head!
Everybody chant!
To: placebo11
This makes sense. Then they can spend the entire article ripping him apart.
108 posted on
12/17/2004 8:39:07 PM PST by
upchuck
(Oops, flunked the checkup. This tag line banned for excessive oil consumption.)
To: placebo11
Uh oh! Just because one gets picked as 'man of the year' doesn't mean that it is a 'good' thing. I am cautious about this. I hope it is for the good, but fear that it might not be. They could very well try to portray President Bush as being the person to most negatively affect the world. Just an observation.
111 posted on
12/17/2004 9:13:44 PM PST by
Netizen
To: placebo11
If they wish to be iconoclastic, they could choose
SBVT!
Kerry Lied and Good Men Died!
114 posted on
12/17/2004 9:29:42 PM PST by
Prost1
(Postulating the Absurd does not make it legitimate.)
To: placebo11
If this is true, I predict the words "Abu Ghraib" will appear before the conclusion of the article's second paragraph.
115 posted on
12/17/2004 9:41:15 PM PST by
nhoward14
(Freedom costs a buck-o-five.)
To: placebo11
I'll believe it when I see it.
121 posted on
12/18/2004 5:53:17 AM PST by
beyond the sea
(Anyone who says he can see through women is missing a lot.)
To: placebo11
I am so glad that we will be spared of having to see that
morbid puke Michael Moore be given this accolade.
thank you thank you thank you !
130 posted on
12/18/2004 11:38:30 PM PST by
injin
To: placebo11
Man of the Year in Pajamas
131 posted on
12/18/2004 11:42:25 PM PST by
woofie
134 posted on
12/20/2004 11:24:42 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
("All I have seen teaches me trust the Creator for all I have not seen." -- Emerson)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
