Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP VOTERS STILL WANT GIULIANI FOR PREZ: POLL
New York Post ^ | 12/17/04 | IAN BISHOP

Posted on 12/16/2004 11:18:44 PM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-282 next last
To: gungatendo

How many governorships do we control? Close to 30? We also have 55 Senators in the next Congress. If we cannot nominate a candidate from within our farm system with strong conservative credentials (i.e. 2nd Amendment, family values, pro-life advocate) then the GOP is in a lot more trouble than I could have ever imagined.

Four years out, Rudy is simply one of the most conspicuous members of the GOP, enjoying high name recognition and popularity in the aftermath of 9/11. Still, let's remember that pre 9/11, Rudy was going to leave office with his approval ratings in the toilet, scarred by a messy affair that had his mistress living in Gracie Mansion with his wife and children. His illness in 2000 also gave him an out from a race against Hillary that was quickly becoming unwinnable.

It is inconceivable to me that we could support a candidate that is to the left of a party platform that has offered us so much success on a national level since Reagan's victory in 1980.


81 posted on 12/17/2004 2:10:48 AM PST by mull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
The thrust of your argument revolves around the actions Mayor Giuliani took in the wake of September 11, 2001.

Yes, he did ably fulfill his role, and I am glad that we weren't forced to endure the leadership of Mark Green at the particular historical moment.

Putting that aside, I don't see how this makes him indispensable to the future of the Republican Party.

Granted, his positions on foreign policy/national security are probably the most desirable part of any purely theoretical Giuliani candidacy, but that presumes that any prospective opponent would be worse on these issues, which has yet to be established, in my estimation.

82 posted on 12/17/2004 2:13:52 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham (Why did it take me so long to come up with a new tag-line, huh?! What's up with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: gungatendo
[I have no problem with log cabin republicans or anti-gun republicans or pro-choice republicans as long as they realize that some of their views differ from the party platform which republicans sign on to.]

You may not have trouble with Rino Republicans but the South has spoken rather loudly about them. Another NE liberal still won't sell. Nor will it sell with me or a single Republican that I know here in SW Ohio.

Godspeed, The Dilg
83 posted on 12/17/2004 2:18:39 AM PST by thedilg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: chemainus

Condaleeza Rice in her own words has defined herself as an "all over the map Republican". At the end of the day her positions on the issues would be no more palatable to the GOP base than Rudy's. Having said that, I think she has been a fine National Security Advisor and will be just as successful as Secretary of State.

I honestly think you would have to go all the way back to Eisenhower to find a candidate on a major party ticket who had never run for any kind of office before, statewide or national. This would be a serious impediment to any Rice candidacy regardless of where she stands on the issues. In the modern political era, with raising heaps and heaps of a requirement of any political campaign, I don't see how Rice makes a successful run. At this point, I couldn't even identify her base.


84 posted on 12/17/2004 2:19:51 AM PST by mull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Hmmm. The media sure is looking to annoint George W. Bush's successor and he hasn't even taken the oath the second time.

How about the Rats? Why aren't we seeing their "next in line"?

Or do the Dummycrats want to know who they should be targeting so that they can campaign for 2+ years against HIM as they did campaigning against George W. Bush?


85 posted on 12/17/2004 2:22:37 AM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

This Quinny poll must be of New York Republicans...


86 posted on 12/17/2004 2:23:02 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thedilg

All things considered, are there really any substantive policy differences between Rudy and say a Lincoln Chafee? None that I am aware of, and I am totally repulsed by the thought of a Chafee candidacy (not that it would or could ever happen).


87 posted on 12/17/2004 2:23:52 AM PST by mull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: mull
I wish that people would stop parroting these ridiculous fantasy pairings, as if American politics were some sort of Rotisserie baseball league.

Stop with the Clinton v. Rice, or Hillary v. Rudy nonsense.

We need to quash this inane focus on name recognition and celebrity, and start looking for a candidate that can accumulate the requisite number of electoral votes to be elected to the White House four years hence.

88 posted on 12/17/2004 2:26:26 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham (Why did it take me so long to come up with a new tag-line, huh?! What's up with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: mull
There are a number of substantive differences between the two men, but that isn't the point.

The point is, Rudy has too much baggage to ever be elected to a national office.

It's unfortunate, but it does happen to have the benefit of truth.

89 posted on 12/17/2004 2:28:52 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham (Why did it take me so long to come up with a new tag-line, huh?! What's up with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: weegee

I am keeping my fingers crossed that the Dims hop on the Hillary '08 train and ride it right over the cliff.


90 posted on 12/17/2004 2:29:03 AM PST by mull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Rudy's private life is no cake walk either. Bernie being skewered is a definite warning to Rudy as to what to expect from his own party.
91 posted on 12/17/2004 2:29:39 AM PST by PH07718
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
I agree.

Keep your powder dry.

92 posted on 12/17/2004 2:29:53 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham (Why did it take me so long to come up with a new tag-line, huh?! What's up with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Uh, no. Beating Hitlery by 2 points is not a good sign. A Grilled Cheese Sandwich that looks like Richard Nixon would beat her by more.


93 posted on 12/17/2004 2:31:33 AM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mull

"At this point, I couldn't even identify her base."

1. me (a long time 'on the committee' Republican) and other non-pigeon hole Republicans, conservative on some issues, moderate on others but never blindly lockstep; loving critics of GWB

2. women - vote for her 'put up or shut up

3. MANY blacks - the time is right and even overdue

4.a counter to Hitlery Clinton ; perfect foil in all respects

5. an expanded Republican "Base" read Party

6. George W Bush's wholehearted endorsement and run a
Senator as VP

7. a whole bunch of "undecideds'- Dr Rice is VERY electable if the Republicans do not become lockstep, fundamental and arrogant...or is the deal already cut? GW today HC tommorrow?


94 posted on 12/17/2004 2:32:35 AM PST by chemainus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
[From a purely demographic perspective, the GOP needs to nominate someone from the West]

I was raise in the West, but we won twice with a man from the South. Why change? A conservative southerner will be stronger each run into the future. I ask again, why jump off a winning horse?

Godspeed. The Dilg
95 posted on 12/17/2004 2:33:44 AM PST by thedilg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Go Rudy. He's tough, charismatic, has enormous appeal to the moderates who will swing the next election much like they swung this election.


96 posted on 12/17/2004 2:39:56 AM PST by tkathy (The Bluenecks need to get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

I agree that we need to get beyond the Rudy, Condi, Pataki and God forbid, Schwarzeneggar talk and start dealing in political reality.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, after the '96 election, the names being bandied about, and dominating the public opinion polls were Powell, Kemp, Quayle and Elizabeth Dole. The early speculation may be fun, but it is indeed pointless. A few months ago, the MSM was speculating that Cheney would drop off the ticket to be replaced by Rice, Powell, Rudy or McCain. Complete and total foolishness.

2008 will be the first time in recent memory that the GOP does not have a designated heir apparent. After the dust settles on Bush term 2, we need to start investigating options and not be blinded by these baseless public opinion surveys taken a full three years before Iowa and New Hampshire.


97 posted on 12/17/2004 2:40:24 AM PST by mull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

I believe you have it backwards. We need to find a candidate that is a real conservative and will actually advance a real conservative agenda (like maybe vetoing some spending bills). Like my man Ron Paul. And then we need to try and persuade the voters that they should vote for a conservative. You will never make progress toward the conservative goals, which are to the right of the average voter, if you just count heads first.


98 posted on 12/17/2004 2:44:38 AM PST by Red Phillips (Ron Paul in '08! Please God make it happen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Stay outa da Bushes!


99 posted on 12/17/2004 2:47:15 AM PST by Lurking2Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thedilg; BigSkyFreeper; MontanaBeth; Gallegos; Las Vegas Dave; RandallFlagg; Jet Jaguar; ...
The West is the future.

That's why the Democrats are fighting so tenaciously to wrest it from the grasp of the GOP.

If not for some creative acts of ledgermain on the part of the Census Bureau, that extra congressional seat that currently belongs to North Carolina would be in Utah.

If Republicans were smart they would nominate someone from out West.

Frederick Jackson Turner's thesis aside, the West is where it's at.

100 posted on 12/17/2004 2:49:19 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham (Why did it take me so long to come up with a new tag-line, huh?! What's up with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-282 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson