Skip to comments.
Kerry Handler Cahill: Swift Boat Veterans Sank Us
NewsMax ^
| Dec 16, 2004
| Limbacher
Posted on 12/16/2004 6:03:49 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
I compared this with the ABC version and decided to post it because of Limbacher's comments.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"This is the best $40,000 investment made by any political group, but it was only because of the news coverage that it got where it did," Yeah, you keep telling yourself that cupcake. The million copies of the Book that were sold, and the tremendous work of the blogosphere, had nothing to do with anything.....
2
posted on
12/16/2004 6:05:25 AM PST
by
hobbes1
(Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Kerry Handler Cahill: Swift Boat Veterans Sank UsTell it like it is, Cahill.....THE TRUTH sank you
3
posted on
12/16/2004 6:05:31 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Astonishingly, Cahill said Kerry's campaign at first thought there would be "no reach" to the low-cost ad, which originally aired in only three states."
The truth hurts.
4
posted on
12/16/2004 6:06:44 AM PST
by
Max Combined
(Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist")
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"In hindsight, maybe we should have put Senator Kerry out [of his misery]earlier."
6
posted on
12/16/2004 6:09:59 AM PST
by
jocon307
(Jihad is world wide. Jihad is serious business. We ignore global jihad at our peril.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Does the left still fail to grasp the power of Internet, radio and cable news? Yes. Even now, 6 weeks after such a long hard fought campaign, and the dismal failure of their elitist candidate. Yes they still don't see the 'net as anything more but a way to get money to run for a political office. Dean showed them how to do that before he melted down.
let's 'em stay ignorant.
7
posted on
12/16/2004 6:11:21 AM PST
by
theDentist
(Jerry Springer: PBS for White Trash)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
These are the very same people who think that the success of Ronald Reagan was due solely to the way he was 'packaged'.
Hey, we WANT them to think like that, don't we?
8
posted on
12/16/2004 6:12:03 AM PST
by
Slyfox
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
How about this: the TRUTH sank you??
I am still astonished President Bush won re-election. He had MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS of dollars poured into slandering him as a leader, a thinker, and even as a human being. Millionaires happily GAVE of their money and time to try and defeat him...and he still won.
The impact of the Swifties was not their money--it was that they spoke the truth.
God bless America.
But I was nervous for a while, I'll admit. I believed the right would ultimately win, but I still feared for a time that the huge outpouring of funds by a hateful few would persuade just enough people to vote against the President.
To: Puppage
the lack of TRUTH sank Kerry.
How could anyone but a zealot ignore Kerry's dancing around not signing the Standard Form 180?
That one action would have laid to rest all of the need for further defenisve responses....BUT IT NEVER HAPPENED!!!
We all waited and waited and waited.
and in their analysis of Kerry's failure this lack of signatture on that form 180
IS STILL, NOT A PART OF THEIR ANALYSIS OF KERRY'S FAILURE?????
AMAZING!!!!
10
posted on
12/16/2004 6:13:41 AM PST
by
ThirstyMan
(Why is it, all the dead vote for Democrats?)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The Swifties were (and are) an important part to Kerry's demise. But Kerry lost because of Kerry. One said something, the other denied it. One claimed to be a war hero, the other a war protester. One was an obvious elitist snob, the other was obviously not the "man of the people" he pretended to be.
All in all, the Republicans couldn't have asked for a better candidate to run against. The Kerry campaign sank under his own weight.
11
posted on
12/16/2004 6:14:22 AM PST
by
silent_jonny
(It's CHRISTmas, not Xmas!!!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
They keep looking for a "reason" as to why Kerry lost. It was the Swiftboat Vets. It was the Osama Bin Laden tape. It was the gay marriage issue. All of these were a factor but it came down to the one thing they can never admit. America AMERICA JUST DID NOT LIKE JOHN KERRY. Even the votes he did get were votes against Bush. Most Democrats held their nose while casting their votes for Hanoi John.
12
posted on
12/16/2004 6:17:13 AM PST
by
speed_addiction
(Ninja's last words, "Hey guys. Watch me just flip out on that big dude over there!")
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Kerry sank Kerry. The SWIFTboat vets supplied much of the ammunition, but if Kerry had been a decent nominee, he could've risen above it.
Ultimately, Kerry was his own worst enemy. And I take nothing away from the valiant and honorable campaign John O'Neill and the rest of the vets waged. They are wonderful patriots who completed their mission. But Kerry sank Kerry.
13
posted on
12/16/2004 6:18:07 AM PST
by
savedbygrace
("No Monday morning quarterback has never led a team to victory" GW Bush)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
14
posted on
12/16/2004 6:18:41 AM PST
by
rocksblues
(No more Kerry, no more polls!)
To: hobbes1
What does Cahill think of the blanket suppression of the Swifties message by the MSM for three solid months achieved? The Swifities layed it all out in early May at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. fer crying out loud and the press devoutly ignored Kerry's treason with a solid wall of silence.
The new media, however...
15
posted on
12/16/2004 6:21:25 AM PST
by
WorkingClassFilth
(From Ku Klux Klan to the modern era of the Koo Kleft Klan...the true RAT legacy.)
To: savedbygrace
in the final analysis it's not the messenger it's the message
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"This is the best $40,000 investment made by any political group,... I like to think that my little sawbuck packed a whallop this year. The Swiftees have spoiled me for future fundraisers, since now I'll be expecting them to elect my guy for $29.95.
17
posted on
12/16/2004 6:22:32 AM PST
by
gridlock
(ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Integrity. Integrity. Integrity. Thanks Swift Boat Vets!
18
posted on
12/16/2004 6:23:19 AM PST
by
PGalt
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Dems continue to call the Swifties "proven liars" based on little more than their saying so. They then quote "factcheck.org, supported by the VP".
The truth killed the Dems, on this one. I just wish it had the power to take Kerry out of the Senate, where he does not belong. While it was probably the correct political decision to not force the issue, more, for the Bush campaign, Mass Republicans need to force it when Kerry comes up for re-election.
On the finances front, I know I bought the book and contributed $150 directly. $40,000 my butt.
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Shouldn't that be "sunk"?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson