Skip to comments.
Finally - a breakthrough for oil?
heise.de ^
| December 6, 2004
| Craig Morris
Posted on 12/07/2004 1:24:01 PM PST by kevkrom
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: Sam the Sham
Garbage is one of the feed stocks they want to investigate. There are technical issues because of the variability of garbage, so it seems to be a less attractive as an early application. Dealing with stupid and often corrupt municipalities is also a drawback.
To: RightWhale
I remember seeing the Chrysler turbine car at the 1963 World's Fair. It was surprisingly quiet, had a ordinary looking body, and came in one color: a wretched medium brown.
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
This pipe dream is in the same category as coop ethanol plants. It is likely that it takes more energy to produce the end product than the product contains.
You could get more energy by burning the raw material in a boiler to produce steam to run a turbine.
These schemes benefit the promoter, not the investor.
63
posted on
12/07/2004 2:42:39 PM PST
by
hgro
To: the invisib1e hand
No, this is real, and there have been two articles on it in Discover magazine. None of the experts they consulted saw any scientific obstacles. The investors are smart money in for the long haul, like ConAgra and the Buffet family.
To: Lokibob
The oil is currently used for fuel, but it can be refined or blended for other purposes such as lubrication. The oil is chemically identical to petroleum and is not biofuel except in the sense that it uses biological feed stocks.
To: Pete'sWife
The Sierra Club and other environmental wacko organizations will come out against this.
How about PETA? They will say that the turkeys are getting no respect.
One of my links was no good this one is better. A friend who is convinced that it just a matter of time before we get cut off makes his own. He presently gets more oil then he can began to process from fast food outfits and runs his pick-ups pretty much free or so he says.
http://http://www.biodieselsolutions.com/home/home.asp
To: hgro
It is likely that it takes more energy to produce the end product than the product contains. You could get more energy by burning the raw material in a boiler to produce steam to run a turbine. These schemes benefit the promoter, not the investor. Well, that was reasoned scientific insight that is much more credible than the independent scientists who have reviewed the process and found it credible and efficient.
68
posted on
12/07/2004 2:58:48 PM PST
by
kevkrom
(If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
To: kevkrom
To: sandviper
"Not poo guys..... its the guts, head, feet , in other words the stuff we don't eat."
That's what you think!
I have reassembled a whole turkey from parts I have recovered in ground turkey (available in most supermarkets).
70
posted on
12/07/2004 3:11:21 PM PST
by
JohnG45
To: kevkrom
Environmental groups only support energy technologies that they believe are unworkable. Their real agenda is to roll back the industrial revolution. One only has to look at wind energy. They were all for it when they thought nobody could do it. As soon as windmills started going up, they had to find a reason to be against them. That's when windmills became "Cuisinarts for migratory birds".
71
posted on
12/07/2004 3:12:33 PM PST
by
beef
("Blessed are the geeks, for they shall inherit the earth.")
To: Rockingham
PETA will want their pound of flesh. [g]
72
posted on
12/07/2004 3:14:34 PM PST
by
the invisib1e hand
(if a man lives long enough, he gets to see the same thing over and over.)
To: Rockingham
PETA will want their pound of flesh. [g]
73
posted on
12/07/2004 3:14:53 PM PST
by
the invisib1e hand
(if a man lives long enough, he gets to see the same thing over and over.)
To: Lee'sGhost
74
posted on
12/07/2004 3:15:22 PM PST
by
johnb838
("To Hell They Will Go" -- The Iyad Allawi Story.)
To: kevkrom
75
posted on
12/07/2004 3:22:37 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Truth, Justice and the Texan Way)
To: JohnG45
If I don't see the whole bird it must be dog food.
To: kevkrom
Please include me on your Ping list.
Thanks
77
posted on
12/07/2004 3:36:53 PM PST
by
Ramcat
(Thank You American Veterans)
To: r9etb
I can see cities building refineries on-site at their sewage treatment plants, As an aside, sewage plants already use methane extracted from the sewage to drive generators. Our little town does, generating enough electricity to mainly run the plant, but other cities generate enough to sell back to the grid.
78
posted on
12/07/2004 3:39:58 PM PST
by
marron
To: kevkrom
That's an offal idea.
[rimshot]
79
posted on
12/07/2004 3:40:48 PM PST
by
Petronski
(WARNING: Persons denying the existence of Robots may be Robots themselves.)
To: sandviper
"If I don't see the whole bird it must be dog food."
Hell, I served the reassembled bird on Thanksgiving and got rave reviews.
I'm presently attempting to reassemble a cow in my garage in a similar manner.
80
posted on
12/07/2004 3:45:08 PM PST
by
JohnG45
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson