Skip to comments.
N.J. Supreme Court Calls Off Bear Hunt
AP via Yahoo ^
| 12/02/04
| JEFF LINKOUS
Posted on 12/02/2004 3:47:31 PM PST by ZGuy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: ZGuy
What does a court have to do with the State's management of its resources?
The governor, the state legislature should quickly make the announcement that the Bear seaon is on and tell hunters they can ignore the court order, that the court has no jurisdiction.
At some point the representative branch of government has got to step up and exercise its authority. Until it does, the judiciary is going to get deeper and deeper into the administrative functions of government.
21
posted on
12/02/2004 6:18:37 PM PST
by
BJungNan
(Stop Spam - Do NOT buy from junk email.)
To: Gritty
Did they post what constitutional provisional amendment is the grounds for their decisions
To: AdamSelene235
Yes, and require all of the NJ Supreme Idiots (Justices, so-called) to assist while wearing their black robes. The justices can try to hold down the bears while Bradley Campbell can try to go snip-snip in the bear's private parts....... that would be an entertaining sight!
p.s. What business does the NJSC have getting involved in evaluating the "sound management plan" for the bears? That seems like a classic case of judicial over-reach, unless there is some very very specific provision in the LAW that allows them to pass judgment.........
23
posted on
12/02/2004 6:54:48 PM PST
by
Enchante
(Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
To: Williams
This is so asinine! fwiw, I'm in favor of preserving plenty of wild critters in the WILD, in remote areas far far away from children and other vulnerable humans, and I have encountered various bears and other lovable critters in many remote hikes in WY, MT, Canada, etc. But the idea that a bear population must be allowed to explode in NEW JERSEY of all places, one of the most densely populated states, is just the kind of asinine idea loved by liberals. Those NJSC justices should be required to put THEIR FAMILIES on the line in the most bear-populated areas.... let THEM provide the "contraception" for the bears first-hand....
24
posted on
12/02/2004 7:01:28 PM PST
by
Enchante
(Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
To: rcocean
Bears in southern and southeastern NJ aren't in danger due to restrictive gun laws and zoning ordinances; bears in northern NJ are at risk. This goes to the equal protection clause.
Yogi Bear, Esq.
25
posted on
12/02/2004 7:13:37 PM PST
by
BIGLOOK
(I once opposed keelhauling but have recently come to my senses.)
To: ZGuy
All this nonsense results in more vote for Repubs in the next election.
I know the bear problem is a today type problem, and the judges actions might not help a NJ Repub to be elected.........but it does keep the tide moving our way. This kind of junk science will stopp.
26
posted on
12/02/2004 7:28:36 PM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
(Liberalism has metastasized into a dangerous neurosis which threatens the nation's security)
To: ZGuy
The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the state needs to establish a proper management program for bears before it can allow them to be huntedOk so what part of the state or fededral constitution is that provision in
27
posted on
12/03/2004 12:14:44 AM PST
by
freepatriot32
(http://chonlalonde.blogspot.com)
To: freepatriot32
NJ needs a bear amendment referendum
28
posted on
12/03/2004 12:19:46 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(This is your budget. This is your budget on the Drug War. Any questions? [eno_])
To: farmfriend
29
posted on
12/03/2004 3:05:15 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: ZGuy
Paging, Jocelyn Elders!
Send her out to teach them, to satisfy their urges themselves.
30
posted on
12/04/2004 12:57:36 PM PST
by
TERMINATTOR
("I believe in background checks at gun shows or anywhere" - GWB)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson