Posted on 11/24/2004 9:34:43 PM PST by FairOpinion
Now you have it. Wow, that was a great find.
It turned out it was a parody, but it's just about what international "observers" do say about the US.
you are still refusing to answer the question. why do you ignore the fact that most refuse to acknowledge the validity of the election?
the principal does not remain.
The article was satire of some sort, or the author was a nutter.
OK. Here is one, which is not a parody, they mean it.
Big Media’s Democracy Double Standards
http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=4509
The Washington Post and other leading American newspapers are up in arms about the legitimacy of a presidential election where exit polls showed the challenger winning but where the incumbent party came out on top, amid complaints about heavy-handed election-day tactics and possibly rigged vote tallies.
Of course, the election in question occurred in the Ukraine.
In the United States - where exit polls showed John Kerry winning on Nov. 2, where Republican tactics discouraged African-American voting in Democratic precincts, and where George W. Bush’s vote totals in many counties were eyebrow-raising - the Post, the Times and other top news outlets mocked anyone who questioned the results.
You are projecting onto Soros a "plan" which is more a reflection of your own agenda and fears than anything else, is my working theory at present.
Just because there are quite a few of them does not make them correct or perceptive.
Did you see my post about the pilot program in New York?
So clean off your glasses, and take another look. I'm not making this stuff up.
Dictatorship is part of the culture of death. Dictatorship devalues the importance of individual life. The Pope has been consistent about this. He stood up to Communism and now he's standing up to Criminalism.
Just because a bunch of criminals say they will be meaner to gay people than the democratically-elected guy, you would let them turn the country into a dictatorship???
It's true Soros is a very rich, immoral man who wants to influence the world politically. But it's also true that there are quite a few oligarchs backing Yanukovych. They are shady rich men, whose fortunes were achieved even less honestly than Soros', who want to harm the world for personal gain. If you're against Soros, you should be against the Oligarchs ten times as much.
just because the election is a fraud does not make it correct or perceptive.
Putin hates the death culture as well.
there you go, now we are referring to marxists websites for proof. brilliant. you still cant answer the question can you? why do you side with putin and old soviet communists as opposed to the us, eu, powell, bush, nato?
I don't think he is angel. But I prefer him to Soros and Yuschenko.
You know the point I am trying to make -- people can and do say the same thing about both the Ukraine and US elections.
BTW, did you know that Yanukovich won by a margin of almost 3 points?
"Pro-Moscow Yanukovych had 49.46 percent of the vote while Yushchenko was named on 46.61 of the ballots, the commission said Wednesday."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1288173/posts
no i dont understand what you are trying to say. you take putin's word over everyone elses including our own government who says 'there was widespread fraud'
BTW, did you know the election was a fraud?
you still wont answer the question.....why do you take putin's word over the us, bush, powell, eu, nato?
I agree with you and FairOpinion, but I readily admit, I'm not the most informed out there. However if there is one truism in life, everyone has two things, one is an opinion and the other is an (blank so as to not have to type it).
The way I see it which nobody has mentioned.
Putin has been said by the President to be a good guy. Remember everyone how the President said he looked into his eyes and saw his soul?
He's committed somewhat to helping in the War on terror, especially post Beslan. His Iran contracts were pre-Beslan, and since it he's determined to actually help win this war.
Putin's guy, Yanukovich, sees the War on terror. He is committed to staying in the fight, and supporting the US.
On the other hand, we have a candidate embraced by the socialists, who's statements seem to coincide with the socialists. He has France, and Soros behind him which is enough to throw some huge flags against him. He's got all the liberals, including the immoral left as has been mentioned earlier with their culture of death. All that is in his corner.
We don't need EU to grow any further, especially not with another Soros funded person in charge. The lines are already somewhat drawn, and its the Islamic terrorists, and the EU vs Russia and the US. Which side are the Chechen terrorists on? Yushchenko's.
Finally where did the Pope endorse a candidate? Our President didn't either, he just said we would like to make sure the returns were fair, in order to send our seal of approval.
And my disclaimer: I have no contacts in the Ukraine, most if not all of my information came from sources linked from various FR threads and Fox News programs that have touched on it today.
Kerry is the one that has the plan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.