Skip to comments.
Inside Politics: Liberal hubris
The Washington Times ^
| 11/23/04
| Greg Pierce
Posted on 11/23/2004 6:05:33 AM PST by Pfesser
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Elistist eggheads.
1
posted on
11/23/2004 6:05:33 AM PST
by
Pfesser
To: Pfesser
Actually the reason Republicans aren't teaching in academia is because they don't like to be around lazy, self actualizing hippy morons.
And because you can make a hell of a lot more money outside of academia than within it.
2
posted on
11/23/2004 6:07:40 AM PST
by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
To: Pfesser
3
posted on
11/23/2004 6:08:20 AM PST
by
weenie
("A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants." -- Churchill)
To: Bikers4Bush
Bingo!
The ugly little truth also is that most of the people in academia are morons, brilliant morons some, but still morons...
4
posted on
11/23/2004 6:08:52 AM PST
by
Pitiricus
To: Pfesser
Democratic slogan for 2008:
Keep Dope Alive!
5
posted on
11/23/2004 6:09:17 AM PST
by
KidGlock
(W-1)
To: Pfesser
A successful career in academia, after all, requires a willingness to be critical of yourself ...Just make sure that you don't let anyone else criticize you. "Academics" can't stand that.
6
posted on
11/23/2004 6:09:33 AM PST
by
FreePaul
To: Pfesser
Those that cannot DO.... Teach.
There is no tenure in the real world.. you gotta earn your keep.
7
posted on
11/23/2004 6:10:22 AM PST
by
HamiltonJay
("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
To: Bikers4Bush
Those who can do. Those who can't teach...
8
posted on
11/23/2004 6:10:45 AM PST
by
Helotes
To: Pfesser
"a lack of interest in material incentives,"
Interest in or ability to acquire?
9
posted on
11/23/2004 6:10:47 AM PST
by
Time is now
(We'll live to see it......or something like it....)
To: Pfesser
It would be interesting to see how liberal/conservative engineering professors are. I would expect they are more conservative since they deal more with the real world.
To: Pitiricus
I spend 8 to 12 years of my life getting a PHD... work for 30 to 40 a year and maybe work my way up to 70 or 80k a year when I get tenure... OR I can get my 4 year degree, go out in the real world and make more in under 5 years than they will be making after 20 years to 25 years in academia.......
You do the math on who's the fool.
11
posted on
11/23/2004 6:12:26 AM PST
by
HamiltonJay
("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
To: Pfesser
Isn't this pretty much the same argument the KKK used to use to explain why blacks couldn't read or write?
To: Pfesser
LOLOL.....to the two brilliant professors......
WHO'S YOUR DADDY
13
posted on
11/23/2004 6:13:01 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(PRAY FOR MAJ. TAMMY DUCKWORTH)
To: Pfesser
No they as latent Commies, that are bemoaning the fact that we don't have a Police state that would force us STUPID people to believe like them are go to a gulag.
14
posted on
11/23/2004 6:14:01 AM PST
by
marty60
To: Pfesser
And the most ironic part, after saying something like this, is that they'll then turn around and immediately call conservatives/Republicans "bigots" at the slightest provocation, without even attempting to look at issues from our viewpoint.
15
posted on
11/23/2004 6:15:34 AM PST
by
kevkrom
(Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. But it rocks absolutely, too.)
To: Pitiricus
The ugly little truth also is that most of the people in academia are morons, brilliant morons some, but still morons... These academics confuse knowledge of a subject area with intelligence. They really aren't brilliant at all, but some of them know a particular area well. Was it Shaw who said that the reason academic politics is so vicious is that there is so very little at stake?
16
posted on
11/23/2004 6:15:48 AM PST
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: Bikers4Bush
Actually the reason Republicans aren't teaching in academia is because they don't like to be around lazy, self actualizing hippy morons.That and the fact that the old axiom "Those who can do... those who cannot teach" is TRUE!
17
posted on
11/23/2004 6:16:41 AM PST
by
Bigun
(IRSsucks@getridof it.com)
To: from occupied ga
The difference between knowledge and wisdom.
18
posted on
11/23/2004 6:19:21 AM PST
by
L98Fiero
To: Bikers4Bush
Ph.D
Stands for "Personality has Departed"
19
posted on
11/23/2004 6:19:32 AM PST
by
5Madman2
(DemocRATS are Vermin)
To: Pfesser
A liberal that is "critical of himself?" Are you friggin' kidding me? Liberals are NEVER wrong about anything. When have you ever met a college professor that was willing to admit he was wrong?
The only reason liberals flock to academia is that there is no measurable way to gauge their contribution to their jobs, thus they can't be "judged" and perhaps terminated. They basically get paid (usually from the public trough) for researching and teaching liberal thought.
Remember Ann Coulter's "10 minute rule." It's something like, "If you owned your own business, would you allow ANY liberal to run it for 10 minutes?" Yeah, and they are the 'intellectuals.' Pompous asses.
20
posted on
11/23/2004 6:19:44 AM PST
by
GianniV
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson