Skip to comments.
WHY THE DOGS DIDN'T BARK
New York Post ^
| 11/17/04
| RALPH PETERS
Posted on 11/16/2004 11:01:29 PM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
11/16/2004 11:01:29 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Even Sunni Arabs complained of the threat posed to their homes they didn't want their cities turned into little Fallujahs.
For Pete's sake, can it be that simple? That after all this time all we would have had to do was level one of these mud-brick cities and we could have been spared all these months of kidnappings, be-headings, and IEDs?
2
posted on
11/16/2004 11:07:27 PM PST
by
konaice
To: kattracks
What happend to the link?
3
posted on
11/16/2004 11:07:54 PM PST
by
konaice
To: kattracks
Al Jazeera, Kevin Sites, the UN and some in the MSM are trying to stir things up, though...I noticed generally more balanced reporting tonight...There is some hope..God be with that Marine and all in harms way in service of our country.
4
posted on
11/16/2004 11:09:14 PM PST
by
MEG33
( Congratulations President Bush!..Thank you God. Four More Years!)
To: konaice
Ooops, sorry about that. It's been added.
5
posted on
11/16/2004 11:09:20 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Hi Kattracks, the link for this article is missing.
6
posted on
11/16/2004 11:09:32 PM PST
by
DB
(©)
To: konaice
They've got the property-rights bit down OK. Now, if they can only master Free Speech, they'll have it!
To: kattracks
Terror has begun to defeat itself. I love this line. Makes me think of something Rummy or Condi would say.
8
posted on
11/16/2004 11:15:25 PM PST
by
Ruth A.
To: konaice
Exactly so. Until it begins to cost "moderate" Islamics, big time, we will never defeat terrorism. Until these governments like Syria, Jordon, etc., realize that their future survival depends on the control of radical iams, we are in for a long battle.
I think they are coming around, they must understand deep inside what President Bush said, those that harbor terrorists are terrorists, and will meet the same end.
To: MissAmericanPie
We still need to bring this lesson of pain directly home to Saudi Arabia. I strongly believe that is the source of most of this crap.
10
posted on
11/16/2004 11:25:05 PM PST
by
konaice
To: konaice
"For Pete's sake, can it be that simple? That after all this time all we would have had to do was level one of these mud-brick cities and we could have been spared all these months of kidnappings, be-headings, and IEDs?" LOL! I wouldnt call Fallujah just any city, say its made of mud, claim to have leveled it, call the way we liberated it simple, or expect more than a gradual reduction in terrorism, but I think the answer to that is yes. We demonstrated (rather than threatened) a strength thats almost guaranteed for 4 more years. Allawis looking like the strong man for now.
11
posted on
11/16/2004 11:31:42 PM PST
by
elfman2
To: kattracks
The terrorists' attempts to shift the fight to other Iraqi cities didn't find much of an echo. Even Sunni Arabs complained of the threat posed to their homes they didn't want their cities turned into little Fallujahs.
The big stick still works.
12
posted on
11/16/2004 11:36:01 PM PST
by
LiberalBassTurds
(Islam is a religion of peace. Strange every murdering psychopath in the world is attracted to it.)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: LiberalBassTurds
"Strong horse or weak horse" --- take your pick.
14
posted on
11/16/2004 11:51:19 PM PST
by
wildcatf4f3
(out of the sun)
To: konaice
I agree with you, always take off the snakes head.
To: konaice
For Pete's sake, can it be that simple? Yes. Most Arabs respect only strength. Which answers the question as to how in the hell could many of them support and tolerate uncle Saddam even after having half their family wiped out by him. The biggest mistake we could make with these people is conducting a "sensitive" war on terror.
To: konaice
No, it wasn't that simple. President Bush said something about there being 2 tracks, military and civilian. The Iraqis believed they could negotiate with the terrorists in Fallujah. We moved in to support them. But even though the talks never solved anything, it was the Iraqis that called it off - not our military. We are under contract to Iraq - we can't go around smashing up places without their permission.
This time, we have their permission. This time they had learned that you cannot and must not negotiate with these people. But .. as one of the talking heads said, we should just leave Fallujah there for awhile and allow the Iraqis to witness what happens to their towns when they harbor terrorists. Once the Iraqis decide they don't want their towns to look like Fallujah - the terrorists' reign will be over.
17
posted on
11/17/2004 12:04:01 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Where are the dem supporters? - try the trash cans in back of the abortion clinics.)
To: kattracks
With their repeated slaughters of the innocent, their suicide bombing campaign against civilian and government targets, their assassinations of doctors, engineers and educators, and their un-Islamic practice of ceremonial human sacrifice (celebrated on videotape), the terrorists have begun to divide themselves from decent Muslims everywhere, as well as from Arab leaders who tacitly condoned their past activities.Wishful thinking. This respite, such as it is, from true Islam will only last as long as our forces are killing their jihadist vanguard.
18
posted on
11/17/2004 12:09:30 AM PST
by
Fatalis
To: konaice
Actually, it had to go down this way. We are fighting a new kind of war, one in which we must get the most psychological advantage in every move, to get the maximum effect with minimum bloodshed.
Our objective is to promote a free and democratic Iraq in the heart of the Middle East, and do it in a way that kills as many Islamofacists (both Sunni and Shia), and Baathist as is necessary to discredit all three political movements. You do not do this by leveling mud-brick cities.
19
posted on
11/17/2004 1:59:23 AM PST
by
SubMareener
(Reed Irvine you are a Great American! RIP)
To: konaice
"For Pete's sake, can it be that simple? That after all this time all we would have had to do was level one of these mud-brick cities and we could have been spared all these months of kidnappings, be-headings, and IEDs?"
When you were a kid, didn't you ever face a bully on the playground?
20
posted on
11/17/2004 2:26:42 AM PST
by
dsc
(LIBERALS: If we weren't so darned civilized, there'd be a bounty on them.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson