Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House has ordered new chief to eliminate officers who were disloyal to Bush
Newsday ^ | 12132004 | Knute Royce

Posted on 11/13/2004 8:19:10 PM PST by kralcmot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-216 last
To: kralcmot
I still remember so clearly that Clinton's first move was replacing every single field agent of the Justice department in the entire country.
What better way to advance the Socialist agenda?

I am still scratching my head wondering why Bush waited four years to clean house.

201 posted on 11/14/2004 8:13:57 AM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woodyinscc
Let's hope he is next on the list. The lefties in the press will squeal like the pigs they are, but so what. !!!

Bipartisanship: what losers scream hysterically when they find themselves powerless. Also, the appeal to the infantile mind.

202 posted on 11/14/2004 8:16:16 AM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ranger

ok, and i do respectfully disagree. i think the Pakistan government would not withstand the presence of a large contingency of American troops conducting combat operations against the entrenched and indigenous and essentially autonomous tribal/warloard groups in northern Pakistan that the current Pak government has not been able to control. If we go for OBL with a direct invasion of Pakistan or with the assent of the current government, it would be a huge mistake. the more prudent course is to broker a deal between India and Pakistan to shore up the current government and relieve some of the tensions and passions and then let Mussarasharif get OBL who is a serious threat to him as well.


203 posted on 11/14/2004 8:19:58 AM PST by kralcmot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: kralcmot

Agree.


204 posted on 11/14/2004 8:24:15 AM PST by oldngray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Spook86
No wonder Sandy Berger felt so confident walking out of the National Archives with those classified documents in their shorts.

That reminds me...

Is Sandy Berger in Jail Yet?

Among other things of late, my biggest disappointment has been learning that Nixon refused to prosecute a clear traitor, for the girly-man excuse of not wanting to make a martyr out of John Kerrey.
My estimation of Nixon was reduced several notches.
I hope W has more [censored] than that!

205 posted on 11/14/2004 8:26:36 AM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
This can become dangerously close to purging those who disagree with the Administrations preconceived ideas. Should the CIA just be a bunch of yes-men?

Give it a rest. This clearly is in that area between being "yes" men and closer to the other extreme: treason. There is never an excuse for that. None.

206 posted on 11/14/2004 8:30:54 AM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Didn't she just cause one person from State to resign? The diplomat who ruffed up the flight attendent?

A State puke roughed up a flight attendant?

Time to remind those clowns that they are the least useful bureaucracy given the current state of world affairs.

207 posted on 11/14/2004 8:33:39 AM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Former Dodger
The White House has ordered....according to knowledgeable sources.

And 'Newsday' has 8"x10" glossies to prove it. To the folks that brought us Travelgate and The FBI file scandal (Guess who?) I say piffle!!!

208 posted on 11/14/2004 8:35:41 AM PST by Calusa (Bush cooked Kerry's Goose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
To answer the question about Tenant, I would suggest stability was deemed more important in the aftermath of the terrorist strike than cleaning house.

I grudgingly admit to lacking the patience, sometimes, to appreciate the subtleties between tactical and stragegic planning...

209 posted on 11/14/2004 8:38:49 AM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: dk/coro
The agency in its current state is a disaster.

I believe your post reveals the truth. The Agency's human intelligence mission was essentially destroyed by Carter/Turner (with the enthusiastic help of the infamous Church committee). Since then it's been layered with Far Left political appointees and bureaucrats whose agenda is anything but pro-American.

The tragedy of 9-11 revealed the extent of the rot. So did the coordinated barrage of partisan anti-Administration politicking emanating from Langley. This was clearly one of the items the President had in mind when he announced after the election he'd earned some political capital and planned to spend it.

210 posted on 11/14/2004 8:42:45 AM PST by Bernard Marx (Don't make the mistake of interpreting my Civility as Servility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Absolutely, next the State Department.


211 posted on 11/14/2004 8:43:42 AM PST by doug from upland (Vietnam Vets: FINALLY -- welcome home, heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: em2vn
Have you ever noticed what happens when a business CEO finds those who resist his leadership and direction?

I worked for a software company that owned its segment of the market for over a decade. The engineers were in opposition to the CEO, the entire team was laid off, new, more compliant engineers brought in, and the software developed as directed by the CEO. THE SOFTWARE DID NOT WORK! Three years later, the corporation was gone.

212 posted on 11/14/2004 9:51:55 AM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: kralcmot

You've laid out the most intelligent argument I've heard yet for not going into NW Pakistan.


213 posted on 11/14/2004 11:34:39 AM PST by Ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Former Dodger
And why are you so defensive of the Soviets?

I'm not defensive of the Soviets, I'm defensive of the CIA's soviet analysis. You seem to have bought into the left's Michael Moore-type distortions of CIA failure vis-a-vis the downfall of the Soviet Union. It was not a failure -- it was a success. The analysis was correct.

Read this: At Cold War's End: US Intelligence on the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, 1989-1991

Here's a summary:

An objective reading of the [CIA-produced National Intelligence Esitmeates] and other documents ... refutes the allegation that readers of the intelligence assessments at the time of their publication would have come away misinformed about the direction of events and shape of policies in the Soviet Union. They also reject the idea that the Intelligence Community ignored the impending collapse of communism and breakup of the Soviet Union. In fact, the community was probably ahead of most analysis on this issue.

214 posted on 11/14/2004 11:45:08 AM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: dighton

That is a great book!


215 posted on 11/14/2004 12:10:33 PM PST by Gritty ("Bush's redneck America is a more reliable long-term bet than enlighted Europe-Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
You seem to have bought into the left's Michael Moore-type distortions of CIA failure vis-a-vis the downfall of the Soviet Union.

Not at all, I really have little respect for the "vaunted Soviet military", I feel they were way overrated as a military force. Granted their nuclear capabilities were very dangerous, but the Soviet Union was corrupt, and this corruption eroded the capabilities of it's military.

Except, of course, for the Elite units, but the great "socialist state" always treated some more equal than others.

The "lesser units" were given lesser materials, and these were the troops dying in Afghanistan; then there's the Soviet submarine force: how many have died of radiation poisoning?

My estimation of the CIA effectiveness IS based more on news reports than anything else, but MY analysis is based on observation and research as well.

Basically, it's my opinion, and I do respect your opinion. This has been a fun thread, nice chatting with you.

216 posted on 11/14/2004 4:48:27 PM PST by Former Dodger ("Arafat died today, it's the first thing right the French have done in awhile." - R. Lee Ermey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-216 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson