Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Specter: Moderates in GOP must speak
Inquire ^ | Nov. 11, 2004 | Steve Goldstein

Posted on 11/11/2004 7:10:40 AM PST by Former Military Chick

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
We must find a way to block this man!
1 posted on 11/11/2004 7:10:40 AM PST by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Sounds like he is threatening the Republican Party. I hope he leaves the Republican Party. Leave now!


2 posted on 11/11/2004 7:12:45 AM PST by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
I take it he means "moderate" voters.

I haven't even heard "moderate" senators speak out for him, the silence from Snow, Collins, and Chaffee is deafening.

Keep the calls, emails, and faxes rolling. We haven't been asked to stop not even from Frist or Rove.

3 posted on 11/11/2004 7:12:46 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Don't blame me, I volunteered for Toomey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Specter: Moderates in GOP must speak

Translate that stinking liberal RINOS.

4 posted on 11/11/2004 7:13:36 AM PST by trickyricky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

"In an interview, Specter also disclosed that he had spoken to almost all of the nine other Republican members of the committee.

"The sense is, once they know the facts, there is a generally favorable response," Specter said of those conversations. "

Heh. Pretty feeble support from his colleagues.


5 posted on 11/11/2004 7:13:58 AM PST by mondonico (Peace through Superior Firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Once again business as usual in Washington after the election. I really thought, naive as it was, that the 2nd term election would open some eyes and stiffen some spines out there. But I guess not.

What is the choice left to us?
6 posted on 11/11/2004 7:14:09 AM PST by BobCNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

"I not only voted against Bork, I led the charge against him."

- Arlen Specter

7 posted on 11/11/2004 7:15:20 AM PST by glock rocks ("I not only voted against Bork, I led the charge against him." -- Arlen Specter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

No way this guy should lead the Judiciary. What is the point in our winning if we put guys like this in the Vanguard. Let's put the kibosh on this pseudo Republican


8 posted on 11/11/2004 7:15:49 AM PST by grace522 (Let's not slander our intelligence to that degree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
It's a very important battle," he said. "And it's really a battle for balance in the party and it's really a battle for balance in America."

His kind is the reason many left the Republican Party in the past. He will drive more away if he succeeds and I find it a shame that Bush helped him out. I was hoping for a loss in the primaries.

9 posted on 11/11/2004 7:17:36 AM PST by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

I'm inclined to agree with you. My first reaction was that it's up to Bush. If he could put Arlen in a straitjacket and get him to join the team, fine.

Now, I've reconsidered. There's too much danger that Specter will betray Bush toward the end of his term, as he attains lame duck status and as the media step up their attacks on him again before the 2008 election.

Plus, Specter has at least two years to go beyond 2008. Do we want him in charge of the most important committee in the senate at that juncture? I think not.

Specter will be in a strong position for troublemaking. Once he is sitting in the chair, all he has to do is open his mouth at a time of his choosing, and Bush will get hit, not Specter, because Bush is responsible for Specter and wears him like an albatross around his neck.

For instance, one word from Specter in fall 2006, and a lot of Evangelicals might stay home and not vote to support the Bush administration in the congressional elections. The same, in spades, in the 2008 presidential election. Specter will not be up for election then, but others will. That gives him a strong position to pressure and blackmail the party, something he has not hesitated to do before.

No, much safer to block him now.


10 posted on 11/11/2004 7:17:50 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
There really is an urgent need for more vocal participation by moderates and pro-choice Republicans"

Translation: we need a bunch of liberals to pretend like they are conservatives long enough to take over the Republican party.
11 posted on 11/11/2004 7:17:52 AM PST by Thrusher (Remember the Mog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
"That was their mantra, their bugle call. The same people that are after me now were after me in the primary."

Maybe the same kind of people, but there are a whole lot more of them now.

During the primary he was off the radar for most of the country. Everyone else was off fighting their own battles and worrying about their own state -- but not now.

Judicial is just too damn important and he is too damn undependable. I am not confident we can keep him out of the post, but I am not about to stop trying.

12 posted on 11/11/2004 7:19:42 AM PST by Ronin (When the fox gnaws....SMILE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grace522

Isn't there a committee that looks after the affairs of the District of Columbia that he can serve on ?


13 posted on 11/11/2004 7:20:41 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

We must counter the false asertion that specter is a moderate. This is nothing short of BS media triangulation and propaganda.


Specter is a leftist. The only "middle" in specter's mind is the middle seat.

Moderates believe in nothing, stand for nothing. Specter stands to the left of the isle.

The leadership and his fellow members better give him a dose of reality, he speaks at the pleasure of the electorate not his egomania.


14 posted on 11/11/2004 7:22:53 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

I don't really want to see an inter-party bloodletting. But this SOB is making it tough to be magnaminous. It would not be hard to accept moderates in visible positions in the party, but he insists on putting it in our faces. If he does not wise up, his "colleagues" are going to vote him out despite tradition.


15 posted on 11/11/2004 7:29:33 AM PST by Thickman (Voter fraud in this country must be addressed by the Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Moderates in GOP must speak

And is so doing, identify themselves as targets for defeat when their reelections roll around???

Arlen is going to hear nothing but silence because RINO's don't have spines

16 posted on 11/11/2004 7:30:18 AM PST by tx_eggman ("All I need to know about Islam I learned on 09/11/01" - Crawdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman

Dear Arlen:

As a moderate Republican I'd just like to say, "screw you - you pathetic RINO


17 posted on 11/11/2004 7:31:40 AM PST by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Memo to Specter [and even, I hate to say, a certain faction of yes man, kowtowing, 3rd way bootlicker Freepers] RINOs and underminers must STFU.


18 posted on 11/11/2004 7:32:57 AM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks

"I not only voted against Bork, I led the charge against him."

- Arlen Specter



Please post that quote every chance you can... We can not let any of the Presidents nominees for the SC be "Borked"


19 posted on 11/11/2004 7:33:34 AM PST by redrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: redrunner

It's my tagline.


20 posted on 11/11/2004 7:35:19 AM PST by glock rocks ("I not only voted against Bork, I led the charge against him." -- Arlen Specter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson