Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/08/2004 11:51:03 AM PST by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: crushelits

I know he's guilty, you know he's guilty, but if O.J. can walk? And there was a hell of a lot more ACTUAL evidence against O.J.


38 posted on 11/08/2004 12:08:40 PM PST by trubluolyguy (Where do bigots get the idea that God is as close minded as they are?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

I doubt very much that the judge will accept the jury is truly hung at this time. He will probably send them back for more deliberation.


39 posted on 11/08/2004 12:11:22 PM PST by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

I don't think the jury told the judge that they won't be able to reach a verdict. On courttv they said they think the judge may have been told that one of the jurors doesn't want to participate in the deliberation process. Maybe it's the juror that never takes notes, picks his nails and doesn't listen? Then the judge read an instruction on their duties as jurors.


40 posted on 11/08/2004 12:12:18 PM PST by snowstorm12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

I have to say, and I'm speaking generally - not to this thread, I am sick and tired of Scott Peterson. I think he is guilty but I am sick to death of all this publicity.

I think all this handwringing and discussion is absurd - none of it would have happened if Lacy was 400lbs with a face like a mud fence (or like TuhRAYzuh's).

There are a lot of cases out there just as heinous as this which don't get the attention this one does but I don't think they should be headline news either.
Just my .02.


45 posted on 11/08/2004 12:22:29 PM PST by AggieCPA (Howdy, Ags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits
I would not doubt that some mindless liberal female is arguing that....

"He lost his wife and child, that should be punishment enough"!

Along similar lines to the hung jury that let off the two guys that murdered their parents.....

The jury system depends on there being intelligent jurors....the system is breaking down in America because of our public education system.

48 posted on 11/08/2004 12:50:52 PM PST by HardStarboard (Surrounded by Kerry/Edwards Signs in Washington State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

When's he gonna be on Oprah?


50 posted on 11/08/2004 1:00:20 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits
Updated: 03:44 PM EST Peterson Jury May Not Reach Verdict Judge Urges Jurors to Keep an Open Mind in Deliberations By BRIAN SKOLOFF, AP REDWOOD CITY, Calif. (Nov. 8) - In a sign of possible discord in the jury room, the judge in Scott Peterson's murder case lectured the panel Monday about the importance of deliberating with an open mind. ''Do not hesitate to change your opinion for the purpose of reaching a verdict if you can do so,'' Judge Alfred A. Delucchi said after summoning jurors to the courtroom just an hour and half after they resumed deliberations Scott Peterson and his attorneys listen to prosecutor Rick Distaso in court last week. ''The attitude and conduct of jurors at all times is very important,'' he added. ''It is rarely helpful for a juror at the beginning of deliberations to express an emphatic opinion on the case.'' The jurors listened with serious, even grim expressions before they were sent back into the jury room to deliberate. It was not immediately clear what led to the judge's instructions, but trial observers speculated jurors are beginning to reach a deadlock. ''They're stuck,'' said Jim Hammer, a former prosecutor and trial regular. The judge ''clearly has indications that they're beginning to hang.'' Earlier Monday, Delucchi denied a defense motion for a mistrial after jurors examined the boat prosecutors claim Peterson used to dispose of his wife's body. Defense lawyer Mark Geragos claimed jurors violated the judge's orders by doing ''a juror experiment'' when several panelists got inside the boat and rocked it from side to side. The defense has argued that it would have been nearly impossible for Peterson to have heaved his wife's 153-pound body over the edge of the boat without tipping. As an alternative to a mistrial, Geragos asked the judge to show jurors a videotaped experiment performed by the defense apparently showing that the boat would have tipped. Delucchi denied the motion. Peterson is charged with two counts of murder in the deaths of his wife, Laci, and the fetus she carried. Prosecutors claim Peterson killed Laci around Dec. 24, 2002, then sunk her weighted body in the bay. Defense lawyers claim someone else abducted Laci and killed her, then framed her husband. The sequestered jury began deliberations Wednesday and recessed for the weekend. Jurors were monitored in a hotel where they could watch only sports and movies on television, and could use a computer without access to the Internet. They were forbidden from discussing the case. Jurors have two choices should they decide to convict Peterson - first- or second-degree murder. First-degree convictions, carrying the death penalty of life without parole, would mean jurors believe Peterson planned the killings in advance. Second-degree murder convictions don't require a finding of premeditation, and carry sentences of 15-years-to-life for each count. Also Monday, the presiding judge of the courthouse ruled against media attorneys who were seeking to have cameras stationed about 40 feet down a hallway from the courtroom. Last week, Delucchi banned television and still cameras from the courtroom for the verdict, but said he would allow a live audio broadcast. 11/08/04 14:53 EST
51 posted on 11/08/2004 1:20:04 PM PST by freepatriot32 (http://chonlalonde.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

This is a no brainer. They didn't have any hard evidence against this guy. What a waste of tax payer money.


52 posted on 11/08/2004 1:22:06 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson