Schwarzenegger Calls Calif. Dems 'Losers'

Yahoo News ^ | Nov. 4, 2004 | AP

[FairOpinion]

I think Arnold is starting to figure out the Democrats, that you can't compromise with them, you need to crush them.

[FairOpinion]

PING

[MNJohnnie]

So Arnold, what is best in life?

To Crush the Democrats. To drive them before you. To hear the limitations of their women.


Arnold and I disagree on a number of things but MAN am I glad he is on our side.

[ILS21R]

Girlie man losers.

[Question Liberal Authority]

I think Arnold is starting to figure out the Democrats, that you can't compromise with them, you need to crush them.

And he's the RINO moderate! No wonder the left is cracking up these days.

[SteveMcKing]

As Jay Severin said today- what do democrats have to offer by "uniting" with us? Are they going to teach us how to LOSE?

[Enterprise]

"you can't compromise with them, you need to crush them."

Ya, by Krom. Crush dem, drive dem before you, and hear the lametations of der vomen.

[hole_n_one]

"Why would I listen to losers?" Schwarzenegger asked. "Let's be honest."

lol!!

[Dan Middleton]

>>"So Arnold, what is best in life? To Crush the Democrats. To drive them before you. To hear the limitations of their women."<<

The "limitations" of their women? Was that intentional? Funny as heck either way.

[JakeWyld]

Arnold may not always sit well politically with us.

He is a one man media machine for the GOP. I love his one liners.

[Carry_Okie]

Two days after the Democrats took at drubbing at the polls across the country, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (news - web sites) referred to leaders of the state's majority party as "losers."

Considering that Arnold failed to do squat for Bill Jones (after endorsing him over a conservative), and didn't gain a single additional seat in either the Congressional delegation, Assembly or the State Senate, what is he?

[MNJohnnie]

>>"So Arnold, what is best in life? To Crush the Democrats. To drive them before you. To hear the limitations of their women."<<
The "limitations" of their women? Was that intentional? Funny as heck either way.


It was unintentional but after I re-read it I decided to go with it since it is SO appropriate.

[boycottliberalhollywood.com]

"You girlie men need to cool down. Have a few cold bottles of LOOZA. Oh, and Daschle, Hasta La Vista, you Looza."

[FairOpinion]

Come on. Arnold has done a lot to get CA's fiscal house in order.

He also made decisions I don't agree with.

I think you need to look at the "big picture" as they say. I think Arnold has been somewhat naive about Democrats, he wanted to do what had to be done, but was willing to throw them some bones, i.e. compromise about the environment, etc.

But now he is finding out, that the more you compromise with them, the more unreasonable they get.

Arnold is a quick learner. Just watch him, as he is really learning about the Democrats.

[Logical me]

If you could trust a CRAT, that would be another thing. But they cannot be trusted. It would seem that Arnold is beginning to see the light.

[Dems_R_Losers]

Hahahahahahahaha

Dems_R_Losers

[DBeers]

"As Jay Severin said today- what do democrats have to offer by "uniting" with us? Are they going to teach us how to LOSE?"

lmao

[Carry_Okie]

Come on. Arnold has done a lot to get CA's fiscal house in order.

Raising spending at a 6.6% rate that is faster than Davis' average increases while borrowing money, raiding local government for more, and forcing them to get the tax increases and additional fees on a one-time basis with no idea how to cut operating expenses in the future and simultaneously betting on a rosy financial picture is NOT "a fiscal house in order." Further, the consensus opinon is that Arnold's "balanced budget" actually contains a significant operating deficit. You are full of it, again.

I think you need to look at the "big picture" as they say.

LMAO.

I think Arnold has been somewhat naive about Democrats, he wanted to do what had to be done, but was willing to throw them some bones, i.e. compromise about the environment, etc.

Oh, so one minute he is the great fiscal strategist, and the next he is naive? I told you before the election he didn't have a clue. The mediots have let him get away with empty posturing for over a year now.

But now he is finding out, that the more you compromise with them, the more unreasonable they get.

That education has cost the taxpayer over thirty billion dollars (total cost for the bonds, alone), so far. No wonder Wall Street is his biggest financial backer. By the time they "restructure" our debt in order to avoid bankruptcy they'll have made out quite handsomely on his willingness to sell us out for campiagn money.

Arnold is a quick learner. Just watch him, as he is really learning about the Democrats.

You should know better than to try this kind of hooey with me.

[Carry_Okie]

Arnold is a quick learner. Just watch him, as he is really learning about the Democrats.

You refused to support a candidate who didn't need that "education" of which I see no evidence:

• He has appointed members of La Raza to the State university regents.
• He supported a Sierra Nevada Conservancy that Gray Davis vetoed, authored by a gay communist from Santa Cruz.
• He has a appointed member of the Sierra Club heirarchy to the CalEPA.
• His hydrogen fuels program is a thinly veiled corporate agricultural scam.
• He didn't lift a finger to stop gay marriage.
• He continues to negotiate with Cedillo on drivers' licenses for illegals.
• The prison guards rolled him completely for a pittance now in return for more later.
• He "negotiated" minute concessions from the universities in return for more money later.
• He grabbed revenues from cities and counties with a promise to return it later.
• He "negotiated" a minute reduction in workman's comp premiums when all he had to do was copy Arizona's plan and put it on the ballot.
• He's raising more money than Davis ever did, INCLUDING the tribes he swore he would never solicit. In return for that he got a pittance compared to his the amount of gambling revenue he was boasting he would get. My bet is that the revenue won't even offset the direct cost of State social programs to deal with the results of gambling. Instead, he is well on his way to implementing organized gambling statewide.
• His "deregulation" of electrical rates has totally ignored the illegal contracts Davis' people negotiated under a total conflict of interest.
• He used his popularity to make foist a constitutional amendment that makes it possible for the State to balance a budget by borrowing and called it "cutting up the credit cards."
• He opposed Prop 54 (Racial Privacy),
• He didn't support SaveOurState,
• He rolled over on the spending cap.

Other than that, he's doing a great job.

[Bogey78O]

Lamentations. Liberal chicks have few limitations.