Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Specter warns Bush on high court nominations
Houston Chronicle ^ | 11/3/2004 | LARA JAKES JORDAN

Posted on 11/04/2004 3:56:03 AM PST by joesbucks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-175 next last
To: joesbucks
And I would expect the president to be mindful of the considerations which I am mentioning

I would expect you to be mindful of who you're talking to. Are you so lame that you can't speak personally with the President regarding your concerns?

101 posted on 11/04/2004 5:12:27 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeebee
You're brilliant! Bush should nominate Sphincter to the Supreme Court and Angus Sphincter could watch as his republican majority refuses to vote on his appointment! Once he demands they do, the senate majority can vote him down.

The ultimate political lesson in shame.I like it!

102 posted on 11/04/2004 5:13:02 AM PST by blackdog (Can we possibly have just one more "Kidz-Bop"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Landru

Both Republicans and Democrats (and Specter who claims to be the former, but acts like the latter) ought to remember who won this election for Bush -- Casey Democrats.


103 posted on 11/04/2004 5:14:49 AM PST by GratianGasparri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks; dirtboy; Badray; hellinahandcart; Physicist

I see the Sphincter breaks wind again.

It should be Sen. Toomey, not 6 more years of Snarlin' Arlen.


104 posted on 11/04/2004 5:16:11 AM PST by sauropod (Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

I think we need to bombard Frist's office with email, letters, and phone calls telling him to replace this guy. He can do it, Senate procedure allows him to! This article makes me mad. Calling this clown a loyal Republican when he did not campaign for our President or any other Republican in PA! And the audacity to make this statement when he owes his current position to our President and Vice-President! He has no loyalty to anyone except NOW and as Ann Coulter says, they keep guys like him on the leash until the real deal comes along. Just look at the clown that was stripped of power for being a lecherous drunk, another "moderate" Republican Senator - I forget his name just now.


105 posted on 11/04/2004 5:17:08 AM PST by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a hundred pounds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoMonster

They already did. It cost them Senate seats but still no judge for us!


106 posted on 11/04/2004 5:18:39 AM PST by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a hundred pounds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: deport

Where's Ira Inhorn when you need him?


107 posted on 11/04/2004 5:18:41 AM PST by Area51 (Diapers and Politicians need to be changed-For the same reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I sincerely wish Spectre would have lost.

Me too. I'd gladly sacrifice a seat to be rid of this pompous ass.

108 posted on 11/04/2004 5:18:56 AM PST by citizen (Relax. Terrorism is only a nuisance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GratianGasparri
The Casey debacle during the 1992 Democrat conevntion was a moment of shame for the world to witness. It was pivotal in putting the Democrats on display for being the most unethical, intolerant bunch of canibals dining in a daycare.

All democrats who think loyalty exists within that party should rethink their fantasy reality.

109 posted on 11/04/2004 5:19:51 AM PST by blackdog (Can we possibly have just one more "Kidz-Bop"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Area51

Ira Einhorn is out shopping for some good sturdy luggage.


110 posted on 11/04/2004 5:21:14 AM PST by blackdog (Can we possibly have just one more "Kidz-Bop"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

This piece of crap sould be put on the back burner by the Republicans. He along with the other socialist Republicans from the blue states have run roughshod over the Republicans to long.
Thses liberal are in the same camp together and must be outed. They are nothing more than spies and pacifist for the Democrats.They should come into the camp or announce they are not really Republicans and call for special elections back at their home base. Of course they would probably win again but show them for what they are,they come from Democrat States anyway are are just used to spy,subvert and neutralize the Republican Party anyway. They like Kerry are traitors.


111 posted on 11/04/2004 5:22:09 AM PST by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

This piece of crap sould be put on the back burner by the Republicans. He along with the other socialist Republicans from the blue states have run roughshod over the Republicans to long.
Thses liberal are in the same camp together and must be outed. They are nothing more than spies and pacifist for the Democrats.They should come into the camp or announce they are not really Republicans and call for special elections back at their home base. Of course they would probably win again but show them for what they are,they come from Democrat States anyway are are just used to spy,subvert and neutralize the Republican Party anyway. They like Kerry are traitors.


112 posted on 11/04/2004 5:22:09 AM PST by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
"We'll have to see where he (Spector) stands," said Cornyn, a close friend of Bush

*snip*

I'm intending to sit down and discuss with him how things are going to work. We want to know what he's going do and how things are going to work."

Maybe Spector will not get the chairmenship.....it looks like the Republicans may deep six him if he's off the reservation and with the threats he just made to Bush in this article it looks like he's already off the reservation......

Stay tuned it's gonna get interesting.

113 posted on 11/04/2004 5:22:12 AM PST by thingumbob (Kerry/Edwards are sKerry/Leftwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

At this point we need to use all means neccessary to turn Specter into a pile of d*ckless damaged goods with zero influence.

Take out key members of his staff with scandals.

Take out his backers in retribution.

Make sure nobody wants to touch him.


114 posted on 11/04/2004 5:27:03 AM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Frist can take care of this.

Exactly, it's not like Spector delivered PA for Bush. With the gain of seats in the Senate Spector should stf up and let the process play out. All conservatives want are strict constructionists. The constitution means what is says a pretty simple concept. If Specter wants it to mean something else he should amend it, not force his blue state view of judges on us.

115 posted on 11/04/2004 5:27:39 AM PST by stig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Just when you think it's safe to come out the RINOs attack. I heard a report on FOX this AM that Chafee was considering switching parties yesterday, but then reconsidered when he realized he'd be missing out on of all the goodies being in the majority party. What an @ss.

What really kills me is the disloyalty. When a president selects judicial nominees the only reason the Judicial Committee should refuse to let the whole Senate vote on that nominee is if the nominee is professionally unqualified.

The fact of the matter is, I'm afraid, is that certain RINOs are media whores, and their own celebrity ranks above all else. They know blocking a Bush nominee will get them heaps of praise in the MSM. Sad. Ted Kennedy can just step back and laugh.

It'll be interesting to see how the Admin and Frist approach this looming episode.


116 posted on 11/04/2004 5:28:30 AM PST by The Hound Passer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

And the president warned newly- (and barely-) elected senator Arlen Specter that if he didn't shut his cake hole, he would find himself hanging coats in the Senate cloakroom.


117 posted on 11/04/2004 5:36:15 AM PST by IronJack (R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
Yes. The process for doing this would go along the following lines. The Chairman of the Senate Rules Committee, after caucusing with the Republican leadership and counting the votes, would at the start of the new Senate session move the rules for adoption for the governance of the new Senate. This would probably happen after a Rules Committee hearing and debate on a proposal to change the filibuster/cloture rule (Rule XXII). It is really the cloture requirement (60 votes) that is the key, not the filibuster itself. The Committee vote would go along party lines, and the Committee would vote out the new rules for floor debate. After debate on the rule to change filibuster/cloture, it is likely that no other rule will be changed, the question on adopting the new Rules would be called. The presiding officer of the Senate during floor debate would rule against any attempt to filibuster the proposed rules (because until there is a new rule there can be no filibuster which is merely part of the rules of a prior Senate and, as such, would not be binding on the new Senate unless and until adopted by a majority of the new Senate. Note: the Constitution is very clear on when super majorities shall apply, e.g., treaty ratification. IN ALL OTHER INSTANCES, A SIMPLE MAJORITY SHALL GOVERN. And, Article I, Section 3, Clause 4, provides that the Vice President shall be the President of the Senate, but shall have no vote, "unless they be equally divided." Thereby, codifying the simple majority mandate, except when the Constitution expressly provides for a super majority). When floor debate is concluded, the vote on the Rules for the new Senate would be by simple majority, with a tie vote being broken by the Vice President in his constitutional capacity as Senate President. Everything will work as long as the are 50 votes for the new Rules.
118 posted on 11/04/2004 5:36:40 AM PST by Pharlap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: crz

Unfortunately, Specter probably realizes he is a lame duck (highly unlikely to be in any condition to run again in 6 years) and, therefore has nothing to lose by being as obnoxious as he wants to be. I used to be what is called a "broken glass Republican". Now, I call myself a broken glass conservative. I wrote in Toomey's name and would have crawled over broken glass to vote AGAINST Specter. Hopefully, Santorum has learned a lesson and will convey his mea culpa to his constituency. Otherwise. . . bring on the broken glass!


119 posted on 11/04/2004 5:43:02 AM PST by PA BOOKEND
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

I would love to see the President and Frist call Specter into the oval office. Politely offer him coffee. Then tell him to keep his trap shut and give him an earful about his betrayal.

"We stood by you in your primary, when we had a real Republican giving you a run for your money. Our support saved your sorry @$$. You turned around and betrayed us. We saved you so you could help us, and you BLEEPed us. You not only BLEEPed us, you could have done a lot for your party. Several house seats in your home base of the Philly suburbs lost because you didn't support them. You abandoned us. And now you have the temerity to lecture us about appointments you jack BLEEP?

"Hey chucklehead, the President makes court appointments, not the judiciary committee. And if you'll note, you are supposed to be evaluating them for competence, not their politics. There are no litmus tests. Oh and by the way, you are now in charge of coat check at the cloak room, not the judiciary. You ran on 'My clout is Pennsylvania's clout' well, good luck next time without any clout. Now get the BLEEP out of my office.


120 posted on 11/04/2004 5:44:16 AM PST by blanknoone (I wouldn't vote for Benedict Arnold. I wouldn't vote for Karl Marx. I won't vote for John Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson