Skip to comments.
Senate Analysis: Getting to 60 On Judicial Nominations in The New Senate
www.crushkerry.com ^
| 11/3/04
| www.crushkerry.com
Posted on 11/03/2004 7:37:13 AM PST by crushkerry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: biblewonk; Grampa Dave; JPJones; LincolnLover; jmstein7; backinthefold; .cnI redruM; Lazamataz; ...
2
posted on
11/03/2004 7:38:13 AM PST
by
crushkerry
(Visit www.crushkerry.com to see John Kerry's positions filleted))
To: crushkerry
3
posted on
11/03/2004 7:38:15 AM PST
by
rwfromkansas
(BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
To: crushkerry
4
posted on
11/03/2004 7:40:24 AM PST
by
Dr Snide
(vis pacem, para bellum - Prepare for war if you want peace)
To: rwfromkansas
5
posted on
11/03/2004 7:40:27 AM PST
by
crushkerry
(Visit www.crushkerry.com to see John Kerry's positions filleted))
To: crushkerry
I thought it was 55-44-1.
Close races were all wins (or looking good) last time I checked:
Thune (won)
Martinez (close, but ahead.)
Murkowski (close / ahead)
CNN shows 53-44-1, waiting on FL and AK
6
posted on
11/03/2004 7:44:12 AM PST
by
Gil4
To: rwfromkansas
What about Martinez? Yeah, I don't get why they haven't called the race for him. 70,000 vote lead he has.
To: Dr Snide
Secretary of Hotness Ann Coulter
8
posted on
11/03/2004 7:47:07 AM PST
by
duffthor
(Kerry For President (of france))
To: crushkerry
Great article. Will start visiting your website on a regular basis.
9
posted on
11/03/2004 7:48:54 AM PST
by
searchandrecovery
(Socialist America - diseased and dysfunctional.)
To: duffthor
it would be a shame to cover those legs with that long robe. Hey, mini-judical robes!!!!! Just don't let Ginsberg or O'Conner wear one.
10
posted on
11/03/2004 7:48:57 AM PST
by
Dr Snide
(vis pacem, para bellum - Prepare for war if you want peace)
To: Gil4
Has Puff Daschle conceded yet?
11
posted on
11/03/2004 7:49:00 AM PST
by
duffthor
(Kerry For President (of france))
To: crushkerry
12
posted on
11/03/2004 7:49:46 AM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
To: crushkerry
It'll be time for the Nuke Option in January '05 if you ask me.
To: crushkerry
They don't need 60.
All they need is Bush calling them out as obstructionists and they'll be fired in 2006.
Cheney also has nothing to lose by going nuclear and demanding an up or down vote.
I'm certainly not going to worry over this....
14
posted on
11/03/2004 7:52:23 AM PST
by
mabelkitty
(Blackwell for Governor in 2006!!!)
To: Gil4
Murkowski is a "hold", not a pick up.
15
posted on
11/03/2004 7:53:47 AM PST
by
crushkerry
(Visit www.crushkerry.com to see John Kerry's positions filleted))
To: crushkerry
Landrieu is not up for reelection until 2008, so she will be a lost cause until at least 2007 when she feels it may be necessary to try and moderate herself.
16
posted on
11/03/2004 7:54:20 AM PST
by
Aetius
To: crushkerry
You know, I wonder if the Dems are going to really select Harry Reid the new Minority Leader.
Why? Well, Nevada has just gone for Bush--again--and is more or less a GOP state (GOP has the governorship, one of two US Senate and two of the three Congressional seats).
What's my point? Reid as Minority Leader would have to, as Daschle did, slide to the Left politically as a national figure in the party, and be subject to being targeted by the GOP in 2010 (if he runs again) as being "out of touch" with a pretty GOP red state.
Do the Dems want to risk, six years from now, having yet another very high profile member of their leadership go down to defeat? Why not select a similarly experienced and respected Dem (I know, the phrase "respected Dem" looks very odd) from a safer seat?
17
posted on
11/03/2004 7:54:54 AM PST
by
LincolnLover
(Thune Wins + G Dubya Wins = I am Deeply Gladdened (Election Day 2K4))
To: crushkerry
If the 'Rats in the Senate want to become Democrats and have a future as a party, they would make Bayh their new minority leader.
18
posted on
11/03/2004 7:56:28 AM PST
by
You Dirty Rats
(WE WILL WIN WITH W - Isara)
To: Aetius
"Landrieu is not up for reelection until 2008, so she will be a lost cause until at least 2007 when she feels it may be necessary to try and moderate herself." She may tougher to beat then, since 2008 is a presidential election year and the Landrieus can and will GOTV in New Orleans.
On the other hand, either Bobby Jindal or Buddy Roemer should give her a real run for her money.
19
posted on
11/03/2004 7:56:46 AM PST
by
LincolnLover
(Thune Wins + G Dubya Wins = I am Deeply Gladdened (Election Day 2K4))
To: crushkerry
No doubt, this a HUGE, the SCOTUS appointments that is. I now think rehnquist will not return to the bench and will instead retire in days/weeks.
Bush will have another 2 more at least.
Scotus appts by Bush AND 4 years of Federal bench appointments could be as important as winning the war on terror for the future of America, make no mistake, this is hugh.
20
posted on
11/03/2004 7:57:21 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson