Posted on 10/27/2004 7:03:43 PM PDT by ambrose
From yesterday's NY Times article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/27/politics/27bomb.html?oref=login&pagewanted=print&position=
October 27, 2004
MISSING EXPLOSIVES
No Check of Bunker, Unit Commander Says
By JIM DWYER and DAVID E. SANGER
-snip-
Colonel Anderson, who is now the chief of staff for the 101st and spoke by telephone from Fort Campbell, Ky., said that he did not see any obvious signs of damage when he arrived on April 10, but that his focus was strictly on finding a secure place to collect his troops, who were driving and flying north from Karbala.
"There was no sign of looting here," Colonel Anderson said. "Looting was going on in Baghdad, and we were rushing on to Baghdad. We were marshaling in."
The New york Times is a bad joke. My Lord, this is laughable.
LOL, spin spin spin.
spin spin spin ...... your dead nyt....... dead.....
kerry just lost the election...... just lost it ....
he dissed the military just like he did in 71...... he just lost the election....
Clearly the NY Slime and Kerry would only be happy if more GI's died defending the explosives....
Let's go loot the New York Times! I need something for the bottom of he cage.
(Joke)
What maybe some of the vietcong might know something about this too.
The are trying to spin their way out of the hole.
They are a disgrace to journalism.
"It is possible that Iraqi forces removed some explosives before the invasion."
With that one little sentence, the Kerry campaign suffers a mortal hit from the New York Times.
Pure kaka coming from the NYSlimes.
Is Dan "Denial" Rather editing the NYTimes now?
Now the NY Slimes is using IRAQIs as the be all-end all of the truth?? BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
You know, I just wonder, do these guys come to work wearing the hammer and sickle on their coats, or do they wait until they get into the office to slip into their totalitarian uniforms?? What a complete and utter propaganda machine for the leftwingnuts the NY Slimes is!!
And to think, I used to respect them...heh.
But today, I am gladly a
Recovering_Democrat!
The NYT uses lies and innuendos.
This article says nothing about the LIE that the explosives were removed after U.S. forces arrived.
This article is a fu*king smokescreen.
This is what's known as a multi-story correction
This is like the pitiful Nightline "the Viet Cong back up Kerry's story" bs piece.
Didn't they learn from the CBS debacle????? Just report ALL sides and points of the story. That is all we ask. Don't leave out details that may discredit your theory. The NY Times is supposed to be the paper of record....it is what we expect.
These people at the "Old Grey Whore" are a joke
Of course, the NYT will always believe the word of someone else (in this case Iraqis) over our own Military.
I'd just like to know why the IAEA didn't destroy the explosives when the UN Inspectors told them to do so in 1995!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.