Posted on 10/24/2004 9:56:19 PM PDT by Utah Girl
Very clever. Kurtz uses the column to cite a litany of charges against Bush under the guise of a news story. No mention is made of Rathergate, the Halperin memmo, or the fact that Bush was interviewed by Russert. Or the MSM's biased coverage of Iraq, Abu Grahib, etc.
Sounds to me like the Forehead is trying to stigmatize any upcoming indictments as "political retribution" in the hopes that the DOJ will be too intimidated to proceed. I can hardly wait.
Yeah Katrina, well you ain't seen nothin' yet. .....Wait 'til Tom DeLay wins in '08 ;)
Well .. this is not my theory .. that belongs to Rush.
I do agree with your analysis. Without the House - which is where the charges would be brought, there's no way the dems could pull this off. Thank you .. now I feel better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.