Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator covered up evidence of P.O.W.'s left behind When John Kerry's Courage Went M.I.A.
Village Voice ^ | February 24th, 2004 | Sydney H. Schanberg

Posted on 10/23/2004 1:31:33 PM PDT by Rome2000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: Rome2000

bttt


21 posted on 10/23/2004 1:48:55 PM PDT by RightWingMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

BTTT


22 posted on 10/23/2004 1:49:09 PM PDT by afnamvet (Tuy Hoa AB RVN 68-69 Jet Noise...The Sound of Freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
Is this the "Big Story for Monday" tip called on Powerline, Redstate and INDC Journal?

Earlier Thread

Powerlineblog

INDC Journal (Includes links to 7 more)

23 posted on 10/23/2004 1:49:35 PM PDT by 1stMarylandRegiment (Conserve Liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

I "heard" Rove is waiting til week before election to hammer this point.....


24 posted on 10/23/2004 1:50:16 PM PDT by HereComesTheGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 45semi

25 posted on 10/23/2004 1:50:27 PM PDT by Rome2000 (The ENEMY for Kerry!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

Kerry is endorsed by the Communist party www.cpusa.org doesn't that tell you something?


26 posted on 10/23/2004 1:50:42 PM PDT by Henchman (Who gave KERRY entré to the VC @ Paris? T.Kennedy? McGovern? ...some"high" low D'rat probably)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1stMarylandRegiment

Here are details of a few of the specific steps Kerry took to hide evidence about these P.O.W.'s.

* He gave orders to his committee staff to shred crucial intelligence documents. The shredding stopped only when some intelligence staffers staged a protest. Some wrote internal memos calling for a criminal investigation. One such memo—from John F. McCreary, a lawyer and staff intelligence analyst—reported that the committee's chief counsel, J. William Codinha, a longtime Kerry friend, "ridiculed the staff members" and said, "Who's the injured party?" When staffers cited "the 2,494 families of the unaccounted-for U.S. servicemen, among others," the McCreary memo continued, Codinha said: "Who's going to tell them? It's classified."



Kerry defended the shredding by saying the documents weren't originals, only copies—but the staff's fear was that with the destruction of the copies, the information would never get into the public domain, which it didn't. Kerry had promised the staff that all documents acquired and prepared by the committee would be turned over to the National Archives at the committee's expiration. This didn't happen. Both the staff and independent researchers reported that many critical documents were withheld.

* Another protest memo from the staff reported: "An internal Department of Defense Memorandum identifies Frances Zwenig [Kerry's staff director] as the conduit to the Department of Defense for the acquisition of sensitive and restricted information from this Committee . . . lines of investigation have been seriously compromised by leaks" to the Pentagon and "other agencies of the executive branch." It also said the Zwenig leaks were "endangering the lives and livelihood of two witnesses."

* A number of staffers became increasingly upset about Kerry's close relationship with the Department of Defense, which was supposed to be under examination. (Dick Cheney was then defense secretary.) It had become clear that Kerry, Zwenig, and others close to the chairman, such as Senator John McCain of Arizona, a dominant committee member, had gotten cozy with the officials and agencies supposedly being probed for obscuring P.O.W. information over the years. Committee hearings, for example, were being orchestrated to suit the examinees, who were receiving lists of potential questions in advance. Another internal memo from the period, by a staffer who requested anonymity, said: "Speaking for the other investigators, I can say we are sick and tired of this investigation being controlled by those we are supposedly investigating."

* The Kerry investigative technique was equally soft in many other critical ways. He rejected all suggestions that the committee require former presidents Nixon, Ford, Reagan, and George H.W. Bush to testify. All were in the Oval Office during the Vietnam era and its aftermath. They had information critical to the committee, for each president was carefully and regularly briefed by his national security adviser and others about P.O.W. developments. It was a huge issue at that time.

* Kerry also refused to subpoena the Nixon office tapes (yes, the Watergate tapes) from the early months of 1973 when the P.O.W.'s were an intense subject because of the peace talks and the prisoner return that followed. (Nixon had rejected committee requests to provide the tapes voluntarily.) Information had seeped out for years that during the Paris talks and afterward, Nixon had been briefed in detail by then national security advisor Brent Scowcroft and others about the existence of P.O.W.'s whom Hanoi was not admitting to. Nixon, distracted by Watergate, apparently decided it was crucial to get out of the Vietnam mess immediately, even if it cost those lives. Maybe he thought there would be other chances down the road to bring these men back. So he approved the peace treaty and on March 29, 1973, the day the last of the 591 acknowledged prisoners were released in Hanoi, Nixon announced on national television: "All of our American P.O.W.'s are on their way home."


27 posted on 10/23/2004 1:51:31 PM PDT by Rome2000 (The ENEMY for Kerry!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Howlin-- I know you have an extensive ping list. Could you use it for this thread please?


28 posted on 10/23/2004 1:52:28 PM PDT by sissyjane (Silk pajamas for dress up, and flannel for everyday-perfect Freeper wardrobe!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1stMarylandRegiment

"Is this the "Big Story for Monday" tip called on Powerline, Redstate and INDC Journal?"

Note the date- February 2004- so it seems unlikely this is the story for Monday- unless there's newly discovered info.


29 posted on 10/23/2004 1:52:28 PM PDT by SE Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

If it isn't the story it should be.


30 posted on 10/23/2004 1:53:44 PM PDT by Rome2000 (The ENEMY for Kerry!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: afnamvet

Don't be suprised the Village Voice running this,
was this during the time Dean was still in the running?

It was the Dean effect.


31 posted on 10/23/2004 1:54:40 PM PDT by inpajamas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

How did Kerry even get to be on this committee? Why wasn't it challenged?


32 posted on 10/23/2004 1:58:12 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Bump


33 posted on 10/23/2004 2:00:36 PM PDT by Rocket1968 (Democrats will crash and burn in 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dante3

34 posted on 10/23/2004 2:01:22 PM PDT by Rome2000 (The ENEMY for Kerry!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: All

Cheney was Secretary of Defense according to the article. Do you think he knows something but is keeping for "ace in the hole" or being "the boys club" that the senate is, would he keep quiet.

I think we should get SBVT and POW's to demand a hearing at the very least.


35 posted on 10/23/2004 2:02:28 PM PDT by Txsleuth (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

36 posted on 10/23/2004 2:03:38 PM PDT by Rome2000 (The ENEMY for Kerry!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

Damn, Ramsey Clark is a fascist!


37 posted on 10/23/2004 2:05:32 PM PDT by Txsleuth (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

38 posted on 10/23/2004 2:06:23 PM PDT by Rome2000 (The ENEMY for Kerry!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

The backstabbing S.O.B.


39 posted on 10/23/2004 2:07:54 PM PDT by The Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inpajamas; MeekOneGOP
A year after he issued the committee report, on the night of January 26, 1994, Kerry was on the Senate floor pushing through a resolution calling on President Clinton to lift the 19-year-old trade embargo against Vietnam. In the debate, Kerry belittled the opposition, saying that those who still believed in abandoned P.O.W.'s were perpetrating a hoax. "This process," he declaimed, "has been led by a certain number of charlatans and exploiters, and we should not allow fiction to cloud what we are trying to do here."

Dean was still in the race. Kerry instructed staff to destroy evidence of living prisoners of war.The article outlines his traitorous actions.

He wanted and needed Clinton to give Vietnam the green light on trade. Clinton did so.

This was done for a Kerry family member's financial dealings with Vietnam. It was all about money for Kerry.

40 posted on 10/23/2004 2:11:03 PM PDT by afnamvet (Tuy Hoa AB RVN 68-69 Jet Noise...The Sound of Freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson