Skip to comments.
Why Taxes Have to Go Up (The NY Times explains Democratic policy -- not so secretly)
New York Times ^
| October 21, 2004
| Editorial
Posted on 10/21/2004 11:32:08 AM PDT by OESY
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: FreedomCalls
Actually, we should bring back war bonds to pay for the war on terror. I'm sure quite a few people would buy them. How would that be different from what is happening now?
The deficit is financed by bond sales -- in various denominations and time spans. "War bonds" would simply involve making them in lower denominations and selling them over the counter -- at a higher cost and, thus, lower return.
21
posted on
10/21/2004 6:03:23 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: OESY
If the pre-Bush tax rates were restored for the top 25 percent of taxpayers, a vast majority of filers - in the 15 percent tax bracket and below - would still be shielded from an increased burden. Correct me if I am wrong but aren't those people in the lower brackets the ones consuming the vast majority of government services?
22
posted on
10/21/2004 6:44:17 PM PDT
by
rudehost
To: OESY
At least if we can keep the House, Kerry can't raise our taxes by executive order! He isn't King yet!
23
posted on
10/21/2004 6:46:04 PM PDT
by
MHT
To: rudehost
There is only ONE reason for the Times to print this..it makes Maureen Dowd look almost sane by comoarison..
24
posted on
10/21/2004 6:46:58 PM PDT
by
ken5050
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson