Pat Buchanan: "It's Time To Come Home (Pat Returns To GOP)

Amconmag ^ | 10-18-04 | Pat Buchanan

[radicalamericannationalist]

So you're the intellectual equivalent of Chris Matthews and Lawrence O'Donnell, commenting on books you haven't read. Come on, grade school kids even know that you should at least read the first, middle and last chapter of a book before reporting on it so that you don't confirm suspicions of what a fool you are.

[CWOJackson]

"So you're the intellectual equivalent of Chris Matthews and Lawrence O'Donnell, commenting on books you haven't read."

No, I actually listened to pat buchanan talking about his book on the Michael Medved show for a whole hour. He went in to great detail on it which was more then sufficient to make a determination...pat's book in his own words.

You must have missed the threads about his Medved appearance. They were quite fun.

[CWOJackson]

Now if you want to read even worse BS, pop on over to pat's unAmerican nonConservative and read the garbage he's shilling for his homosexual buddy Justine.

I'd post excepts to it but Justine got his knickers in a knot one evening and threatened to sue if anyone posted his anti-American BS on FR again. But it's good to see that he/she has found an American outlet. It must have been lonely only having your work spread by Pravda.

[radicalamericannationalist]

Yes, I did miss that talk and the thread. But I also read the book, which stated specifically that Kerry could not be elected. Amazingly, the book is the best source for what the book says.

[Walkin Man]

It’s time to come home.

The republican and democrat parties are the entities that need to "come home".

This piece is a plea from PB to vote for the lesser of two evils. Sorry Pat, no sale.

[CWOJackson]

Actually I believe buchanan is the best source regarding the latest version of his same old book...and as he described some of the chapters it was hilarious.

[radicalamericannationalist]

Ironically, I think the book itself is the best source and not responses to what was likely a hostile interview. It would be like judging the Swift Vets based on the Lawrence O'Donnell interview with John O'Neill. But then again, you and Mr. O'Donnell share the same opinion on having to read the book before judging it, so that makes sense.

BTW, notice how I don't make blanket statements about the Medved interview, a source I didn't access? I can probably guess how it went but I don't claim to know because I didn't hear it. Intellectual honesty isn;t that hard.

[CWOJackson]

"Ironically, I think the book itself is the best source and not responses to what was likely a hostile interview."

LOL! As you said, you didn't hear the show and didn't see the threads, nothing hostile about it. Medved was very cordial to buchanan.

That's the problem you patsies have, you don't want to judge buchanan on buchanan, "I think the book itself is the best source." No, the words right from the jerks mouth are the best source. As you say, intellectual honesty isn't that hard...and buchanan is bankrupt in that department.

[Phsstpok]

Pat, we don't want your sorry, Ted Turner loving, butt.

You have no power here! Begone with you!

[CWOJackson]

So tell me, did you like the chapter in pat's book where he claims that Islamic Extremists ARE NOT a threat to America?

He said he dedicated a whole chapter to it.

[CWOJackson]

"So tell me, did you like the chapter in pat's book where he claims that Islamic Extremists ARE NOT a threat to America?"

Did you miss that chapter?

[radicalamericannationalist]

Yes and it was insanely contradictory because he is wrong on that issue. I've never claimed that I agree with his foreign policy. Isolationism is no defense.

That said, he still said that Bush needs to win in that book. That some of his other ideas are off the wall, to be polite, does not obscure that fundamental fact. Can you point me to the politician who is perfect on every issue?

[CWOJackson]

"That said, he still said that Bush needs to win in that book."

So? About 80% of his book is trashing President Bush. Then he expects readers to ignore that 80%?

Look at his recent "endorsement" of President Bush. He very weakly endorses Bush, then almost immediately unleashed yet another lying screed attacking the President (that would be the one where he claims President Bush is setting things up for his brother to get the White House next election).

That's buchanan's problem. You can't take his 1% seriously if you look at the other 99%. I won't waste good money on a book (and very few people have which is why it dropped 30% in price it's very first three days out) written by some loon who believes Islamic Extremists are not a threat to this nation.

[mlocher]

"My asking out Joni Dinwiddie in 1977 was far worse"

LOL.....where are the details? and what sources do you quote? gotta be a great story here...

[mlocher]

"Stay Pat! Stay!"

how about "patstay...patstay..." say that a few times real fast.

[ex-snook]

"Their political perfectionism would hand the reins of America over to Comrade Kerry, who would immediately put us under the thumb of the UN. "

I don't hear Conservatives talk about enforcing 14 UN resolutions.

[Friend of thunder]

It’s time to come home.

All of a sudden I have fond feelings for a slightly smaller tent.

[HalleysFifth]

Wha'? I just don't see your point.