Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Platoon defies orders in Iraq; cites safety concerns
The Drudge report ^ | Oct. 15, 2004 | Drudge

Posted on 10/15/2004 11:22:24 AM PDT by blogblogginaway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-217 next last
To: CatoRenasci; Jeff Head; Travis McGee; Squantos; Lion Den Dan; Valin; Matthew James; Old Sarge

I wasn't there, but for the year I was in Vietnam I had enough sense of pride in myself that I made certain my equipment was ready for the mission, and often that mission did take me into harm's way. None of the soldiers I work with on a daily basis seem to be the type who would refuse to do their jobs.


41 posted on 10/15/2004 11:48:25 AM PDT by SLB ("We must lay before Him what is in us, not what ought to be in us." C. S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
I don't know if "Rock Hill" means that most of the soldiers are from this town or are connected to it--but I can tell you it's far, far from a liberal stronghold.

I’ll bet we will learn some interesting facts about this unit in the next 24 hours.

42 posted on 10/15/2004 11:48:51 AM PDT by Screaming Eagle Red Leg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Yes he is--just looked at his website. Took me forever to figure out he was a dem, or at least get verification.


43 posted on 10/15/2004 11:49:48 AM PDT by Mamzelle (Fast Eddie and Big Betty--let them sue McDonald's and leave us alone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

I'm just going by an email I got from a friend who's on freerepublic and always listening to Fox.


44 posted on 10/15/2004 11:50:08 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dvldog03
"They knew there was a 99 percent chance they were going to get ambushed or fired at," Hill said her daughter told her. "They would have had no way to fight back."

Were they not issued rifles?

If these troops have nothing more than rifles to defend a tactical supply line we got Big Problems. You don't put troops in these circumstances unnecessarily. We've been over there well long enough to understand the need for overwhelming fire-power support for all aspects combat and supply. We're supposed to be the most powerful force and we'd better start acting like it -but rifles, only rifles, I hope not!

45 posted on 10/15/2004 11:50:09 AM PDT by Chief_Joe (The Sun, it also rises...wash thy troubles away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Screaming Eagle Red Leg

And, in the meantime, we can keep a lookout for trolling. That'll likely tell us what we need to know.


46 posted on 10/15/2004 11:50:42 AM PDT by Mamzelle (Fast Eddie and Big Betty--let them sue McDonald's and leave us alone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
Sorry People. In this area of Iraq you need escorts every time and up armored trucks. You are going to be attacked EVERY time out especially transporting fuel.

I suspect this unit has 818 5 ton trucks which are very old and slow. They need 915 series trucks which can run 65 plus making them harder to hit.

I know there is more to this story than what has come out.

While I don't agree with their actions I am disheartened but not surprized that people have already labled them poor soldiers and cowards.

47 posted on 10/15/2004 11:50:57 AM PDT by Newbomb Turk (Coming to you live from Operation Iraqi Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvldog03

Let's see...

They're Army reservists so they have rifles... they just won't fire because they haven't been cleaned for 6 months (or more).

This is why the Marine Corps has the motto "every Marine is a rifleman." Put 'em on the trucks and God help the rag-head terrorist who tries to get in their way!!!

Court Martial all the cowards.


48 posted on 10/15/2004 11:51:12 AM PDT by Terpesman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Isn't it funny how Drudge is trying to make the headline as alarmist as humanly possible? Is this guy a media-whore or what? You'd swear the whole army is running away. Pathetic.

Cutting throught the rhetoric, it sounds like these guys were complaining about their vehicles being unroadworthy and not having a helicopter escort. Maybe that's true, maybe it's not. Other soldiers from the same company ended up going so clearly they didn't think it was such a big deal.


49 posted on 10/15/2004 11:51:22 AM PDT by Trippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

They went about it wrong. Refusal wasn't the way to go, the ranking member should have expressed concern and taken it up to the chain of command. The army has some serious problems. No wonder they are having a hard time getting soldiers if this is how they're treating them! They need some serious reform in that branch.


50 posted on 10/15/2004 11:51:40 AM PDT by linda11567
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
"I would not want any member of the military to be put in a dangerous situation ill-equipped," said Thompson, who was contacted by families

It happens, it's war. If it was a lawful order, even if stupid, they MUST obey or face court martial.

Does anyone know if coawrdice in the face of the enemy qualifies as a shooting offense ?

51 posted on 10/15/2004 11:51:47 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Truth, Justice and the Texan Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Hmmm.
This came from the relatives' family members?
Just like the Abu Ghraib story?
Was Hackworth involved somehow?


52 posted on 10/15/2004 11:52:18 AM PDT by mabelkitty (W is the Peoples' President ; Kerry is the Elite Establishment's President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

Indeed. We'll see soon enought, but the MSM will be swinging it for Kerry for all they're worth. If the platoon in fact refused a lawful order on the grounds they would be put in harm's way, they are guilty of cowardice in the face of the enemy. That's a whole lot more serious than refusing a lawful order, it's one of the few UCMJ articles subject to the death penalty.


53 posted on 10/15/2004 11:53:23 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty

Could be, but keep a pointer tuned to the ages of our posters.


54 posted on 10/15/2004 11:53:24 AM PDT by Mamzelle (Fast Eddie and Big Betty--let them sue McDonald's and leave us alone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

That just might be something Mr. Kerry should answer when he voted the funds to support the troops.


55 posted on 10/15/2004 11:53:47 AM PDT by mabelkitty (W is the Peoples' President ; Kerry is the Elite Establishment's President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Yes, a Democrat.


56 posted on 10/15/2004 11:54:35 AM PDT by demlosers ( ONI: “Lieutenant Kerry wasn’t cleared to know what time it was!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

"I don't know if "Rock Hill" means that most of the soldiers are from this town or are connected to it--but I can tell you it's far, far from a liberal stronghold."

After spending the first 18 years of my life in the Hill, I couldn't agree more. I left in 1987 but my parents still live there (near Northwestern HS). I don't recognize any of these names though.


57 posted on 10/15/2004 11:54:48 AM PDT by Blzbba (John F'in Kerry - Not a Master Debater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

I recall early in Korean war when there was a shortage of everything, we flew aircraft that were held together with baling wire, and once even with rope. You did what had
to be done with what you had.


58 posted on 10/15/2004 11:56:01 AM PDT by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Chief_Joe

Bump.


59 posted on 10/15/2004 11:56:10 AM PDT by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
A bygone era:

http://www.abmc.gov/ph.htm

60 posted on 10/15/2004 11:56:26 AM PDT by Screaming Eagle Red Leg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-217 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson