Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google Founders on Hiring Trip to India
myway news / AP ^ | Oct 13, 3:18 PM | S. SRINIVASAN

Posted on 10/14/2004 8:47:17 AM PDT by Walkin Man

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last
To: Walkin Man

"Why would a company pay someone $80K a year when they can get the same production for $10K?"

The thing these nimnods haven't figured out is that they are transferring their Intellectual Property over there. They are handing over the Crown Jewels to a bunch of people who will go work somewhere else or may steal the IP and sell it to someone. This has happened with several other companies and the way the law is over there, no one ever seems to get punished. Plus, once they have sold it, it's gone forever.

Or suppose it doesn't get hijacked and sold to someone else. The people who are working for Google over there and being trained in the technology can go start their own company, using the proprietary, patented technology to become Google's competition.

This seems so obvious to me. Am I the only one that thinks this?


21 posted on 10/14/2004 10:23:53 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
Pardon me, but I think , although such taxes would be favourable to many, it could be ruled as an anti-trade policy by the WTO, or some other such organisation in which the US has stakes in. Would you then suggest that the US get out of these?

Yes I would.

As matter of fact I wish someone would point out to me the section of the US Constitution that gives an unelected by Americans foreign trade body the right to set or change American law? Who elected these Europeans to oversee United States trade practices??

The politicians of either party that signed away our freedoms to NAFTA and the WTO should have been impeached for treason, IMHO.

22 posted on 10/14/2004 10:24:19 AM PDT by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

"In the first quarter of 2004, just 4,633 workers were laid off as a result of offshore outsourcing due to mass layoffs—about 2 percent of total mass job layoffs."

Yes, it's only 2% of the total but it's concentrated very heavily in just a few areas. That makes the impact more severe than if it were spread out across all areas.


23 posted on 10/14/2004 10:25:50 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man

"As matter of fact I wish someone would point out to me the section of the US Constitution that gives an unelected by Americans foreign trade body the right to set or change American law?"

Unfortunately when the Congress votes to sign a treaty there is the ability to sign our rights away in the process.


24 posted on 10/14/2004 10:27:55 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man
...The politicians of either party that signed away our freedoms to NAFTA and the WTO should have been impeached for treason, IMHO.

About the treason thing, maybe something can be done, but it wouldn't change status quo, now, would it? A lot is at stake here, and I can say with certainty nothing will or can be done to change the past.

25 posted on 10/14/2004 10:30:32 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: webstersII
Unfortunately when the Congress votes to sign a treaty there is the ability to sign our rights away in the process.

And thats exactly what they have done, democrat and republican.

I wonder what the founding fathers would make of these Benedict Arnolds that signed away the freedom and the country they died for?

26 posted on 10/14/2004 10:37:44 AM PDT by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
About the treason thing, maybe something can be done, but it wouldn't change status quo, now, would it?

So we should all just march into the brave new world that the globalists have constructed for us eh?

Sadly that is probably what will happen. However, I don't believe the vast majority of Americans will like the kind of world that free traders will impose on them.

27 posted on 10/14/2004 10:43:06 AM PDT by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
What about the big-name company call-center in India that had an employee there pull the entire corporate database off the server -- names, phone nembers, addresses, socials, credit card numbers, etc -- and told the company that if they wanted it back they had to pay a huge amount? There was nothing they could do. The FBI said it was a problem for the Indian police. The Indian police wouldn't do anything without a bribe almost as big as the ransom. The company ended up paying the bribe and quietly moving most of its sensitive operations back to the U.S.

There are huge ramifications for moving your operations into a place where U.S. laws do not apply and the U.S. legal system does not operate.

28 posted on 10/14/2004 10:54:16 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man
As matter of fact I wish someone would point out to me the section of the US Constitution that gives an unelected by Americans foreign trade body the right to set or change American law?

We signed a treaty to that effect.

Relevant part of the Constitution:

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land;

29 posted on 10/14/2004 10:57:36 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

"There are huge ramifications for moving your operations into a place where U.S. laws do not apply and the U.S. legal system does not operate."

These corporate guys are thinking they will get something for nothing.

Just ask Aramco and some other oil companies what happened to them in the 70's. They drilled wells and built refineries in Saudi Arabia using their US profits. Then the Saudis "nationalized" those plants and took the equipment.

Do these internet "geniuses" think they will escape the same treatment? Duh.


30 posted on 10/14/2004 10:59:03 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: webstersII
Yes, it's only 2% of the total but it's concentrated very heavily in just a few areas.

Recessions will do that . . . unless you have some specific areas in mind?

31 posted on 10/14/2004 11:00:06 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man

Google has been heavily advertising for programmers in the U.S. for at least a year. Any science or technical magazine will have a google ad.


32 posted on 10/14/2004 11:00:18 AM PDT by js1138 (Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man
Hmmm, why don't they just use Google to look for "extraordinary talented entrepreneurial people who want to make a big change in the world" ? Cobbler's children... etc?
33 posted on 10/14/2004 11:02:23 AM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man
I wonder what the founding fathers would make of these Benedict Arnolds that signed away the freedom and the country they died for?

I think the Founding Fathers were more concerned about those folks who formed "factions," and didn't understand the Constitution. [hint]

34 posted on 10/14/2004 11:03:25 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: js1138

Shhh . . . don't you realize all those jobs are in India?


35 posted on 10/14/2004 11:04:14 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

I have to assume they couldn't get enough talented programmers in the U.S.

My wife asked me why I didn't apply. I just had to hang my head. Google is cutting edge. They want advanced mathematicians and A.I. experts who can program or design programs.


36 posted on 10/14/2004 11:07:52 AM PDT by js1138 (Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

"Recessions will do that . . . unless you have some specific areas in mind?"

You missed my point. Recessions usually affect many segments of the labor market and many industries, impacting most of the population. In contrast, the outsourcing we are seeing to India affects the high-tech sector almost exclusively. This concentrates the loss of jobs and technology in a much smaller segment, making it more difficult for those people to find jobs, whereas people not employed in those areas will not be affected much by this narrowly-focused impact.

Therefore, 2% doesn't seem like much unless it's concentrated in a small area. Then it has a much bigger impact.


37 posted on 10/14/2004 11:09:12 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: js1138
I have to assume they couldn't get enough talented programmers in the U.S.

More specifically, they couldn't get enough talented programmers for the salaries they were willing to pay in the U.S.

38 posted on 10/14/2004 11:10:45 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: webstersII
Right. Ever hear of the dot-com bubble? How about telecom manufacturers flooding the supply chain and billing forward? Corporations upgrading their systems for Y2K?

You had a shake-out in the industry. It's part of the business cycle. Rather, it is except for our resident protectionist hysterics.

39 posted on 10/14/2004 11:12:58 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man

and believe me, you find plenty of freepers who are perfectly willing to look the other way at illegal immigration if it means that their steak at the Outback is $2 cheaper because the restaurant has a mexican dishwasher.


40 posted on 10/14/2004 11:14:24 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson