Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 10/13/2004 7:39:23 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator, reason:

Duplicate still in breaking http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1243544/posts



Skip to comments.

Mystery Surrounds Kerry's Navy Discharge
The New York Sun ^ | October 13, 2004 | THOMAS LIPSCOMB

Posted on 10/13/2004 5:26:34 AM PDT by LOC1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: Arkie2
What was being reviewed, then, was Mr. Kerry's involuntary separation from the service. And it couldn't have been an honorable discharge, or there would have been no point in any review at all.

Bad logic.

It wasn't the only possible point to reviewing his obligation.

There's 'up or out' (Lt Kerry not being promoted).

There's review of the Navy's personnel and skills needs.

An officer's obligation is open-ended, and the services routinely review officers training and specialties to see if those are what the service needs.
41 posted on 10/13/2004 7:10:37 AM PDT by Mike Fieschko ("Quo usque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LOC1

I posted this on another board and the liberals went apopletic. I hope Rush and the others get hot on this story. The Dems pushed the NG story forever. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.


42 posted on 10/13/2004 7:13:43 AM PDT by RichardW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

There's another thread urging caution for the very reason you describe. I'm just a passenger on this issue. I'll wait for the judgement of the experts. There's certainly enough pajama clad researchers on FR to get to the bottom of it!


43 posted on 10/13/2004 7:20:33 AM PDT by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

What is not speculation is:
Kerry's poltical opinion thru 1969 becomes incompatible
with Navy service.
Kerry requested separation from active duty in
late '69 / early '70, was released from active on 3-1-70.
Kerry's (reserve) obligation ended in 1972,
but he hangs around till 1978 ??


44 posted on 10/13/2004 7:25:39 AM PDT by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: greasepaint
Kerry's (reserve) obligation ended in 1972 but he hangs around till 1978 ??

And your point is ...?

As an officer, unless he is discharged, he has an open-ended obligation to his branch.

This was post-Viet Nam draw down.

He didn't get promoted, his skills didn't match anything the Navy was likely to need (shallow water inshore fast tactical [S.W.I.F.T.] boats), and the Navy didn't want to spend money on retraining him.

SOP.

If there was a military court convened, show me the records.
45 posted on 10/13/2004 7:32:17 AM PDT by Mike Fieschko ("Quo usque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

ex-Texan =

"Exceptional-Texan"?

;^)


46 posted on 10/13/2004 7:42:10 AM PDT by TexasTransplant ((I made my Fortune selling Sugar Coated Cat Turds on a Stick at the DNC Convention ©))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

I suppose it could be stated that an officer has
some 'open ended relationship' to the service, but it is
certanly not a 'compelled-lifetime' relationship.
Kerry had an ethical obligation to end his
sham 'service' in the Reserves by resigning, when
it was appropriate to do so.


47 posted on 10/13/2004 8:36:21 AM PDT by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: LOC1

On this subject, maybe the more threads the better. You might want to check out this thread for how the story developed. It is still active.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1243434/posts?page=326#326


48 posted on 10/13/2004 8:56:21 AM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson