This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 10/13/2004 7:39:23 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator, reason:
Duplicate still in breaking http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1243544/posts |
Posted on 10/13/2004 5:26:34 AM PDT by LOC1
I posted this on another board and the liberals went apopletic. I hope Rush and the others get hot on this story. The Dems pushed the NG story forever. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
There's another thread urging caution for the very reason you describe. I'm just a passenger on this issue. I'll wait for the judgement of the experts. There's certainly enough pajama clad researchers on FR to get to the bottom of it!
What is not speculation is:
Kerry's poltical opinion thru 1969 becomes incompatible
with Navy service.
Kerry requested separation from active duty in
late '69 / early '70, was released from active on 3-1-70.
Kerry's (reserve) obligation ended in 1972,
but he hangs around till 1978 ??
ex-Texan =
"Exceptional-Texan"?
;^)
I suppose it could be stated that an officer has
some 'open ended relationship' to the service, but it is
certanly not a 'compelled-lifetime' relationship.
Kerry had an ethical obligation to end his
sham 'service' in the Reserves by resigning, when
it was appropriate to do so.
On this subject, maybe the more threads the better. You might want to check out this thread for how the story developed. It is still active.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1243434/posts?page=326#326
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.