Posted on 10/12/2004 8:47:46 AM PDT by robowombat
C'mon BE--why not the Universe?
SCOTUS certainly did not "limit" the massacre at Waco, nor the forcible deportation of a 5-year-old to Cuba.
I agree with some of what they have to say but in general they make me ill.
...."into disrepute'????
Libertarians who are honest admit that they begin from the presumption that there is no God.
What "reputation" do they have to LOSE?
Your link goes to a thought-provoking essay, indeed.
Thanks.
You sir, are correct.
Lord, what a load of indoctrination those neosoc's must get.
Libertarians are conservitives that haven't grown up yet -- I agree with some of what they have to say but in general they make me ill.
Bill, - you've got it backwards. -- Your illness leads you to believe odd things about people & philosophies you can't understand.
Get some help.
Community Mental Health Hot Line
http://www.jurban.oupjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/79/3/417
Still distorting the Constitution in an effort to make us all learn Spanish, open boarders?
I have been reading a good deal of Libertarian literature, Rothbard in particular, interesting fellow, Browne is a self serving Ahole whom I have hated for years. Murray realized in his dotage that he was really a Conservative which I thought I was rather neat.
Good to see that you are alive and Lurking, Bill.
Like a dog to red meat, I haven't seen you around for awhile so I thought I would rattle your cage.
Thanks. I enjoy encaging you with your silly, babyish rattling.
Still distorting the Constitution in an effort to make us all learn Spanish, open boarders?
Didn't JR shut you up on that issue in the last discussion here?
No one at FR wants either completely 'open borders', or a completely closed society. -- We have to conform to our Constitutions rule of law on that issue, just as we do on all the others.
I have been reading a good deal of Libertarian literature, Rothbard in particular, interesting fellow, Browne is a self serving Ahole whom I have hated for years. Murray realized in his dotage that he was really a Conservative which I thought I was rather neat.
Good to see that you are alive and Lurking, -- and confused as usual, -- little Billy.
Ah, yes. When LB calls a spade a spade, out comes the Libertarian to deny what all eyes can see.
Free Trade, "all have rights" (but nothing about obligations)---yes, indeedy, the dope-smoker wing of the Republican Party.
Tell me, tpaine, why would ANY Libertarian vote for Bush? Not because of his love for the Restrained Government written into the Constitution. Not for his love of Freedom of (Political) Speech. Certainly not for his "Faith-Based" and equally Un-Constitutional initiatives. And MOST certainly not for his mission to save the world from disease and to install "freedom" (to vote?)---
Is it just taxes?
Wasn't me. I gave up beating up on Libertarians when I was supporting Karla Howell for Gov and collecting signatures for the repeal of the Mass Income Tax, well Karla until Mitt jumped in.
Several of us got slapped, not hard, by an Admin Mod for beating up on _Jim for acting like an apparatchik but I apologized when he made two Conservative posts in a row, it must have been fatal because I haven't seen him around lately.
Good to hear from you, Bill.
Heaven forfend!
Or did you forget (/sarcasm)?
-- your idiocy about libertarian philosophy beginning with "the presumption that there is no God", is simply ignorance.
-- "No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another" is perhaps the most basic premise of libertarianism.
Ah, yes. When LB calls a spade a spade, out comes the Libertarian to deny what all eyes can see.
What am I denying that you "see"?
Free Trade, "all have rights" (but nothing about obligations)---yes, indeedy, the dope-smoker wing of the Republican Party. Tell me, tpaine, why would ANY Libertarian vote for Bush? Not because of his love for the Restrained Government written into the Constitution. Not for his love of Freedom of (Political) Speech. Certainly not for his "Faith-Based" and equally Un-Constitutional initiatives. And MOST certainly not for his mission to save the world from disease and to install "freedom" (to vote?)--- Is it just taxes?
Beats the hell out of me what you're ranting about here 9not. Do you have a point?
Instead of forming a wing of the party with an agenda that is in someways to the right, they help defeat our candidates an help impose a rat slavery up on us.
JR is not _Jim, and I'm not 'Bill'.
You drinking tonight, billy?
Little Bill wrote:
Instead of forming a wing of the party with an agenda that is in someways to the right, they help defeat our candidates an help impose a rat slavery up on us.
______________________________________
The RLC, -- which I support, has been established for many years.
A few years ago JR started a new forum at FR:
Free Republic RLC Liberty Caucus
Address:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/rlc/browse
The 'wing' is there, and the rat RINOS that run the GOP ignore it.
So do most libertarians.
Small Government has an appeal to Massholes if you could get enough grass roots people together, a daunting task.
I think the SF approach is the most effective and is working pretty much everywhere. It is working and we are quietly seeing a pretty big bang for the buck in host countries. You would be surprised what leverage can do. Things are right now being done that are extremely efficient in the global counterror environment that do not require a million man army. Take 6 guys and have them show 600 guys how to "kill snakes" etc. It uses less personnel and reduces our global footprint. Effective. No arguments to be lost there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.