Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Concealed Kerry
Free Hunters magazine (Re-printed in the Oct. 04 issue of 1st Freedom) ^ | Oct. 2004 | Wayne R. LaPierre & Chris W. Cox

Posted on 10/11/2004 11:30:14 PM PDT by Redcloak

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: elbucko
It's a facetious argument. The National Guard is part of the U.S. Military. It doesn't have "rights" any more than the Army or the Navy do. They have powers under the Constitution, but not rights. And, of course, if "the people" of the 2nd Amendment really means the National guard, then the 4th Amendment should really be read as...
The right of The National Guard to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the Guard personnel or things to be seized.

21 posted on 10/12/2004 9:56:49 AM PDT by Redcloak (Vikings plundered my last tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Thanks for the ping. Interesting read!


22 posted on 10/12/2004 10:15:13 AM PDT by basil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
It's a facetious argument...... The right of The National Guard to be secure in their persons,..

Excellent example. It shows the great contradictions that the Left has in regards to their concepts of "Rights" and "Powers".

I was in the NG for 2 years, after 6 yrs. active. The National Guard never considered itself "the militia". Since any National Guard unit can be "Federalized", the National Guard would be useless in defending a state from a federal enemy, as is the intent of: "being necessary to the security of a free state..."

23 posted on 10/12/2004 10:22:12 AM PDT by elbucko ( Feral Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
The National Guard and the "unorganized militia" are also separate entities under Federal law.

10 USC 311 states...

§ 311. Militia: composition and classes

(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

(b) The classes of the militia are—

(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and

(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

24 posted on 10/12/2004 10:59:17 AM PDT by Redcloak (Vikings plundered my last tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

BTTT


25 posted on 10/12/2004 11:57:26 AM PDT by spodefly (A torpid disinclination negates the inclusion of a tagline with this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

BTTT


26 posted on 10/12/2004 2:19:57 PM PDT by hattend (I'm on the Mark Steyn Ping List! I'm somebody!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ppaul

I love jtf!


27 posted on 10/13/2004 4:12:49 AM PDT by dennisw (Gd is against Amelek for all generations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak; Joe Brower

Thanx for the post and the ping guys.

It's familiar read to me already, but this makes it easy for me to e-mail a link to all my buddies that hunt.


28 posted on 10/13/2004 8:41:40 AM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (Drivers of SUVs without brush scratches should be horsewhipped! ><BCC>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
As a life-long hunter, John F Kerry would have to have applied for and recieved hunting licenses...
Right?

Are there records of hunting licenses issued in Massachussetts?
Can they be accessed?
Would Kerry's name be found anywhere, in any given year(s)?

I think not..

He's a liar...

29 posted on 10/13/2004 2:29:05 PM PDT by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
Oh, yeah..

And if his name isn't there, then any assertion that he is a life-long hunter is an admission to hunting illegally..

Nothing but a low-down poacher..

30 posted on 10/13/2004 2:31:24 PM PDT by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson