Posted on 10/11/2004 6:20:22 PM PDT by libertylass
You have got to be kidding about firing a blank in the air!! Get arrested for THAT!!! Anyways, Ive got a cousin that would vote for anyone that is a RAT, but he is a deer hunter, I printed off this ad and took it to him, and it got him interested enough, that he checked into everything, and a couple of days ago said that he was voting for W, plus his wife and stepson and two daughters!!
Good job, keep up the good work! Just think how many more people we can sway between now and the election.
IM trying hard as I know how, because this is the most important election in US history, and we have too much to lose!!!
It will be his "gift" to the American people, the repeal of the Second Ammendment; or at lest the re-interpretation of "The right to keep and bear arms" as "The right of the police and military to keep and bear arms".
Lets hope this dont happen!! The biggest threat I see to America right now is President John fn Kerry!! Do all you can to stop that, whether the carolinas, Ohio, Boston, New York, Or Hollywood, People wake the heck up!!! He is bad news for this country, and the wrong choice,and wrong candidate, at the wrong time!!! WAKE UP!!!
Only in an election year. In between elections, the gun controllers start back up again and expect people to forget what they've done by next election. That's how they have disarmed California.
It was President Nixons', Solicitor General of the US, that appeared before the US Supreme Court and declared that the administration considered the 2nd. Amendment as a "collective right". Can you believe it? Nixon and his Country Club Republican cronies concocted this evil interpretation in order to disarm the Black Panthers. As far as I'm concerned, Nixon should be dug up and impeached for this offense to the Constitution. Any right that is considered or rendered "collective", by definition, ceases to be a right. The government has "nullified" the amendment.
it plays on outdoor channel about every 3rd show or so. I havent checked to see if its on their site. i will and if its not ill tape it off outdoor channel, the only channel my dishnetwork stays tuned on :)
the one they always show is the John Kerry's Not A Hunter Wednesday, September 22, 2004
First time for me to see the rest of these ads. very good job NRA!!!
http://www.nrapvf.org/Multimedia/Default.aspx#
These gun-grabbers are really so unreasonable.
CFR blasted a big hole in the 1st ammendment, got passed, signed by Bush (under the assumption it'd get killed), and declared constitutional by the supreme court. Whoops!
The Patriot act was passed (not even read by your legislators), signed by Bush, and you can say good-bye to warrantless searches and Fourth ammendment protections in the name of Homeland Security. Whoops again!
Texas buggery laws? Gone, the USSC rules again. Roe vs Wade? Ditto. Not too many things the USSC isn't willing to decide for those pesky little states out there now, is there?
What's been happening lately is that the concept of federalism (where sovereign states, though united, determine their own fate) is losing way to nationalism (where a single entity decides it for them because they are united [by what God only knows]).
No reason to assume the USSC would not do the same to the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. Sh*t, federal 'infringements' on guns already exist (just what is a BATFE, or national waiting period, or natiional instant check system?) and yet, they should be the last entity 'infringing' on RKBA as per the 2nd ammendment, given it's clearly explicit language...."the right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed".
By pulling the teeth out of the federal leviathan (as intended at this nation's founding during the drafting of the BOR), states could and would be able to protect themselves from the tyranny they have since become victims to, as their several 'balls-less' senators, possessing zero 'statesmenship' whatsoever, have allowed not only a re-growth of dental function, but installed in many cases, fangs instead. And this WILL come back to bite us.
Since the states have failed in their role as a firewall against the usurpation of their own sovereignties, it follows that idividuals must either disobey nationalistic tendencies ("stroke of pen, law of land, kind of cool") themselves or accept them wholsale.
Put me solidly in the column of disobeyance. I'll not adhere to rules from on-high that violate our constitution, nor will I accept laws within my state that deny my God-given right to protect myself or family with deadly force, if need be. I simply refuse to be a victim of crime, whether it be of the local kind, or state and national. The carjacker and anti-2nd ammendment legislator have something in common that they don't share with me: I follow the law.
I wasn't thinking of dogs, I admit :-).
No.
It isn't over until we say it's over!
The U.N. hasn't suddenly changed its collective mind, has it? Complete civilian disarmament is still a priority with them, and the stronger they get, the more stridently they will persue their agenda.
But, hey, since I don't actually see them on my front walk, why not continue to ignore them? It has been working so far.
Me too. I see the model is a bitch. Kind of also fits, like the girlie-man Kerry is.
FYI: Running times on the In-Demand network:
http://www.indemand.com/moviesandevents/viewProductShowtimes.jsp?page_sectionId=2&prodId=20731
Yes well that's just more proof that Nixon was no conservative. He also gave us affirmative action, though to be fair then it was meant to remedy past wrongs done to a couple of groups who comprised only about 15% of the population, whereas now it has been reimagined to achieve diversity even for non-white immigrants and their children who have no claim to past injustices.
But anyway, I remember that when Bush took office his administration reversed the Clinton line and stated that it considers the Second Amendment to protect an individual right, not a collective one. It caused a bit of a stir among some of those stealth-gun ban types and their media allies. Imagaine that; controversy over endorsing the orignial intent of the Second Amendment. It was one of the best things Bush has done, and clearly Kerry would reverse it if he wins.
But it is largely symbolic because the Sup Court would ultimately decide what it means. Not that they should have that right, but they unfortunately do. They did rule on it back in the 1920s or 30s, but I can't seem to find a consensus on what it means, so a definitive ruling awaits.
( It's the largest, most lavishly funded gun-ban organization on the globe and a primary force driving the U.N. gun-ban agenda. )
And everyone that pays to watch is contributing to their funding..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.