Skip to comments.
Painting of N--- Bush Removed from Museum
The China Daily ^
| October 10, 2004
| (Agencies)
Posted on 10/10/2004 12:56:10 AM PDT by AnimalLover
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: InABunkerUnderSF
-"Just the same, there are some people you would just rather not see naked."-
You betcha! Like the naked George Washington on USPS post card stamps. Naked neck and shoulder area only, but, OK, it's NAKED George Washington. What the heck were they thinkin'? I have to use those, and there's NO other choice.
To: boxerblues
its not as bad as you'd think No, its not...but the painting is just plain ugly.
22
posted on
10/10/2004 7:09:19 AM PDT
by
smith288
(Only if Al Qaeda was a debate team would they be scared of Kerry... Bush 04)
To: AmericanChef
Relax, it's probably the heroic classical statue of Washington that used to sit out on the Mall.
He isn't nude, he's wearing a toga.
23
posted on
10/10/2004 7:14:57 AM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
To: AnimalLover
I saw a picture of the painting over on StrangeCosmos, and I have one question. What retarded, nearsighted chimp painted that thing?
24
posted on
10/10/2004 9:27:08 AM PDT
by
exile
(Exile - Helen Thomas tried to lure me into her Gingerbread House.)
To: AnimalLover
From the 1964 Current Communist Goals that were read into the FL Congressional record, goal # 23:
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."
Seems as if Kayti with her perky little name has learned her party's lessons well.
Prairie
25
posted on
10/10/2004 3:49:05 PM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(The Old Media is no longer a news service. It's a transcription service for the DNC.)
To: prairiebreeze
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art." Thanks prairie - I hadn't even thought about that. Think I'll go back and read all the "goals" again.
Maybe we are closer to the USSR - United States Socialistic Republic - than we think!
26
posted on
10/10/2004 6:35:07 PM PDT
by
AnimalLover
((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?))
To: Dustbunny
50 years ago this 'art' would not have even made it into a gallery. Things have certainly changed haven't they! Remember a few years ago the "great" art presented as elephant dung on a picture of the Blessed Mother. And, remember the crucifix in a glass of urine.
No wonder they want to get rid of God and his 10 Commandments. They are breaking every one!
27
posted on
10/10/2004 6:40:49 PM PDT
by
AnimalLover
((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?))
To: AnimalLover
from the Jefferson City (Missouri) News-Tribune - home of the painter
Kayti Didriksen, painter of the controversial "King George" painting mocking President Bush.
28
posted on
10/11/2004 8:28:51 AM PDT
by
rface
(Ashland, Missouri - monthly donor /bad speller)
To: rface
Thanks for the picture! It shows a lot of class!!
(sarcasm)
29
posted on
10/11/2004 3:31:03 PM PDT
by
AnimalLover
((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson