Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry’s losing because he keeps punching the pillow
The Hill ^ | September 29, 2004 | Dick Morris

Posted on 09/28/2004 5:18:09 PM PDT by NewMediaFan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 09/28/2004 5:18:09 PM PDT by NewMediaFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NewMediaFan

I think he has a problem with biting pillows as well.


2 posted on 09/28/2004 5:19:43 PM PDT by Brett66 (Dan Rather, the most busted man in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaFan
The entire democratic party from the top down has positioned itself where bad news for America is good news for them and good news for America is bad news for democrats.

John Kerry, also in this position has compounded it by his continual flip-flopping.

3 posted on 09/28/2004 5:21:09 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaFan
The problem is that the war is an issue that Kerry cannot ignore. He can't go blithely through the campaign pretending it is September 10, 2001. He is in the position of having to go into the water to fight the shark. Lieberman could have gone into the water with Bush on this issue, at least better than Kerry. Dean in his own way could have done so too to the extent that he represented a stark alternative. But Kerry is like a guy who runs in and out of the surf and comes out with a few fingers less each time.
4 posted on 09/28/2004 5:23:25 PM PDT by wretchard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaFan

Morris is ignoring the fact that the ELECTORATE is driving the discussion towards the war on terror (and Iraq).


5 posted on 09/28/2004 5:27:11 PM PDT by ez (TERRORISTS FOR KERRY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaFan

Dear Dickie........Kerry chose to focus on Viet Nam or hadn't you noticed. So from the gitgo your premise is flawed.


6 posted on 09/28/2004 5:34:11 PM PDT by OldFriend (It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: NewMediaFan

Kerry is unelectable in these times given all the VN baggage and a strongly anti-defense Senate career. The bigger issue is why the Dem primary process nominated him, not why he ran such a bad campaign. Nobody could have put a nice shine on this piece of excrement.


8 posted on 09/28/2004 5:34:45 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaFan
Kerry has been maneuvered into this no-win positioning by the pressure from Bush attacking him as weak and vacillating. The windsurfing ad, devastatingly effective, forces Kerry to take strong positions just for the sake of showing he is not weak.

Bush was actually behind the curve on Kerry's flip flop nature. The subject was daily fodder long before the Bush campaign began running ads about it.

gitmo

9 posted on 09/28/2004 5:42:31 PM PDT by gitmo (Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Kerry is unelectable in these times given all the VN baggage and a strongly anti-defense Senate career. The bigger issue is why the Dem primary process nominated him, not why he ran such a bad campaign. Nobody could have put a nice shine on this piece of excrement.

Because it was their (wrong) opinion that all Kerry would have to do was to anounce (over and over and over again) "I served in Vietnam!" and the public would fall into his arms.

10 posted on 09/28/2004 5:46:18 PM PDT by gop_gene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gop_gene

Begin with Iraq? Actually it's only his latest mistake, and he made at least a dozen earlier.

His biggest mistake was to think he could get away with his ego trip on Vietnam. He lied to his Democrat supporters and he probably lied to himself. Now all the dirt is coming out.

But the Democrats should have seen it coming. They know what kind of guy he is. A congenital liar, and not a good liar like clinton.


11 posted on 09/28/2004 5:58:11 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaFan

BTTT


12 posted on 09/28/2004 6:29:26 PM PDT by jokar (On line data base http://www.trackingthethreat.com/db/index.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaFan

If the clouds opened above the headquarters of the DNC, and The Lord Himself shouted, "focus on domestic issues," the Democrats would still get it wrong.

The Democratic Party has not had a new idea since Roosevelt died. The parts of the New Deal that FDR didn't finish, Johnson put in. The only piece they have left is what they call "health care," and there is a very good reason that they have not been able to get it done in 60 years. Most Americans are astute enough to know that what the Democrats propose on health care amounts to an HMO run by the Department of Motor Vehicles. No matter how much people grouse about health care, they know that what the Democrats want to do is worse.

But the Democrats don't have any other ideas. So when someone like Morris — or anyone — comes along and suggests focusing on domestic issues, the first thing that pops into a Democrat's head is "health care." Clinton tried that, and the Democrats' reward was to lose their majority in the House for the first time in 40 years. At the rate the Democrats are going, they won't get it back for another 40 years.

There really is no salvation for Democrats in a focus on domestic issues. Despite the press talking the economy down, the unemployment rate is lower now than it has been for most of my adult life. It's lower than it was in 1996, when Clinton won re-election. There's nothing there for the Democrats to grab on to. Gun control? They've tried that, too. That works real well among the people who are going to vote Democrat anyway. But it drives away people who might have otherwise. Abortion? Same thing... it only plays to the base; it alienates everyone else. Gay and lesbian rights? Now there's a loser if there ever was one.

The truth is, the Democrats are hosed. Americans do not want socialism, and we already have virtually all the leftist programs leading up to it. The only playing space to the left of them involves government ownership of the means of production, whether in health care, some other field, or everywhere. But Americans do not want that.

Worse for the Democrats, as the unions have declined in importance, trial lawyers have taken their place as the big funders of the Democratic Party. And trial lawyers are the next group on the public's agenda to get The Hammer of Thor. People understand, better than the news media think, that guys like John Edwards are the reason that "health care" costs as much as it does. Trial lawyers siphon off some $250 billion every year. They've become a cancer. Which means that the Democratic Party has become the Party of Cancer. When the trial lawyers get whacked — and they will — the Democrats will go right down the tubes with them. They will shrink down to being the Party of Hollywood, which is not how they are going to win elections.

We are watching the end of the Democratic Party in the United States. They sold the public as much of the New Deal as the public wants. Now they are done. There is no more use for them.


13 posted on 09/28/2004 6:42:33 PM PDT by Nick Danger (Freeping in my pajamas since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
Bush was actually behind the curve on Kerry's flip flop nature. The subject was daily fodder long before the Bush campaign began running ads about it.

Right. Dean supporters in Iowa gave him a pair of flip-flops way back when.

14 posted on 09/28/2004 7:10:52 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

Welcome back, Nick. Been on a long vacation?


15 posted on 09/28/2004 7:11:52 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaFan
You can’t attack a sitting president and gain any more votes than you had when you started. If the day-to-day experience of living under the Bush
administration has not led someone to a negative view of his incumbency, an ad or a speech is not about to do it.

We can only hope, but Morris' record ain't that hot.

 

16 posted on 09/28/2004 7:14:09 PM PDT by MNnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

The dummycrats had no choice but to go with Kerry. He was the only one of the slugs in the primary that had a chance of being "electable" ... and that was because he was a veteran running in a time of war. But they were so desperate for a winner that they either didn't bother to vet his senate record or they are so insulated from reality that they actually believed that most Americans would support a candidate who was an anti-war protester.

The biggest story of the 2004 campaign was how the democrats grossly underestimated the American people ... again.


17 posted on 09/28/2004 7:19:43 PM PDT by MNnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
A combination of moving and computer gotchas. Today I remedied the computer gotchas: I ordered the parts for my new "hot box" — 3500+ Athlon64, 2G RAM, 2x 250G SATA drives, some Nvidia screamer, double-layer DVD burner, and a new 21" Sony monitor. Yum yum :)
18 posted on 09/28/2004 7:30:07 PM PDT by Nick Danger (Freeping in my pajamas since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaFan
"..By criticizing the president on his conduct of a war, one has almost implicitly to be criticizing the troops who are waging it. It was only after years and years of obvious chaos in Vietnam that opposition to that conflict became politically acceptable.

Kerry cannot break with a president in his conduct of a war without being seen as negative to the men and women who are waging it..."

These points NEVER stopped him before, and it was much more than "implicit" criticism. This is true to his type. Since Vietnam, in spite of his flip-flops and "nuances" he was never anything else than and Anti-war or anti-defense program politician.

19 posted on 09/28/2004 11:28:55 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

"We are watching the end of the Democratic Party in the United States. They sold the public as much of the New Deal as the public wants. Now they are done. There is no more use for them."

That's good enough to steal!


20 posted on 09/29/2004 8:10:29 PM PDT by SBprone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson