Posted on 09/24/2004 5:43:25 AM PDT by runningbear
He was crying for himself...his jig was up!
good point ! If I just got arrested for a double homicide and was sitting in the back of a cop car I WOULD have more tears than that lol....guess even Snotty can't feel too sorry for himself even. 30 years ago Lee and Jackie should have gone to a movie or something, rather than hatch and dispense this POS for society to have handle at a cost of many millions and 2 inocent lives...
If found guilty, he should be castrated....slowy, without anesthesia. Fake tears, no outrage.....just pure evil.
First degree murder.
maybe they should leave it all intact so BUBBA in cell block 9 will be able to pull him around the "yard". That guy is going to wish for the death penalty when the gang gets thru with him...he has to be one of the most hated in America and I dont think he will be too popular in the joint.......one step away, I think the Jury is ripe and they probably made up their minds when Amber testified.
I think it was a great move for the Prosecutors to show how happy and beautiful and alive Laci was. It shows how horrible this crime was when juxtaposed beside the gruesome autopsy photos.
LOL!!!
You don't hear these THs griping about the Prosecution these days...Looks like they are doing a good job reviewing all these points they have made along the way and Geragross has his work cut out for him....Snott must not be sleeping too good I bet. Bet he says to Geragross, WHAT IF I say I did it and cop to a lesser plea ? w/o admitting to anyone ? since it's looking so bleak.
Watching the Diane Sawyer interviews, he lies everytime when he looks down to the left....and how can an innocent person calmly accept the question DID YOU MURDER YOUR WIFE ? an innocent person would be beside themself, but not Snott, he acts as if you asked him if he likes a tv program ...he acts the same when asked if he told the cops about Amber right from the start, and then asked if he killed her...same looks both times
He was probably crying because he hadn't gotten out of Dodge a day earlier!!
After reading Grogan's testimony, I see that on cross Geragos tries to suggest that Scott was taking all those trips to Berkeley b/c he was "trying to find witnesses, people who had seen him there and could prove he was there."
But then towards the end of Grogan's cross, Geragos starts "testifying" about his/Scott's investigator, Gary Ermoian, having gone to Berkeley to try to find witnesses who had seen Scott there and could prove he was there.
So which is it? Were those trips explainable by Scott's wanting to find witnesses? Or was it Ermoian who was handling that?
And how do you look for, find, and talk to witnesses if you just go to Berkeley for 5 minutes or less, stay in your car the whole time, say nothing to anyone, and then leave??
PS Gary Ermoian sounds Armenian, like Geragos. I don't think I know any Armenians. I think Armenian communities in America should be outraged that someone like Geragos might be seen as an example of one of their people.
ping to myself
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.