1 posted on
09/23/2004 8:00:47 AM PDT by
esryle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
To: esryle
To: esryle
Gee.
Only 800 are fraudulent?
69 posted on
09/23/2004 12:17:16 PM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: esryle
In one example, a man who's been dead for 20 years is apparently a new registered voter. Why is it, when these stories are published, that the party affiliation of the registrant is never reported?
I would think it would be a very logical and important question to have answered. Those who investigated and reported the story must surely know.
70 posted on
09/23/2004 12:18:22 PM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(And everything under the sun is in tune...but the sun is eclipsed by the moon.)
To: esryle
Well seeing as how they didn't bother to mention the deceased's party affiliation, I think we all know what party they are registered under.
71 posted on
09/23/2004 12:18:39 PM PDT by
dfwgator
(It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
To: esryle
Do you suppose the Democrats have EVER won an election fair and square? Would they know how to do it?
To: esryle
I didn't notice the dead guy's party affiliation, but I can guess.
To: esryle
75 posted on
09/23/2004 1:47:43 PM PDT by
Fintan
(Oh...am I supposed to read the article???)
To: esryle
84 posted on
09/24/2004 10:13:48 AM PDT by
loveitor..
(don't tread on me..not even once)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson