Skip to comments.
Int. Criminal Tribunal findings: George W. Bush guilty of war crimes(Is this Clown Court for real?)
Pravda ^
| 09/22/2004
| Michael Berglin
Posted on 09/22/2004 11:17:42 AM PDT by demlosers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
1
posted on
09/22/2004 11:17:43 AM PDT
by
demlosers
To: demlosers
I'm sure the Kerry Kamp will love this one.
To: demlosers
3
posted on
09/22/2004 11:19:57 AM PDT
by
MEG33
(John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
To: demlosers
Soooooo....is this court going to send someone to arrest President Bush, and haul him before the court for sentencing? That would be interesting to watch.
4
posted on
09/22/2004 11:20:33 AM PDT
by
.38sw
To: demlosers
Can I phone in an artillary strike?
5
posted on
09/22/2004 11:20:49 AM PDT
by
theDentist
("John Kerry changes positions more often than a Nevada prostitute.")
To: demlosers
Proving once and for all that international institutions are the tools of brutal dictators and tyrants, and the enemy of the free world?
6
posted on
09/22/2004 11:21:12 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
("With 64 days left, John Kerry still has time to change his mind 4 or 5 more times" - Rudy Giuliani)
To: demlosers
My reaction:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA- *snort, choke, cough* -HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! *Gasp gasp gasp*
Come on, does ANYone take these clowns seriously?
7
posted on
09/22/2004 11:21:26 AM PDT
by
Luircin
(PROUD to be a member of Generation W)
To: demlosers
8
posted on
09/22/2004 11:21:35 AM PDT
by
laotzu
To: demlosers
:::::BURP:::::: yea right.....
To: demlosers
This just in:
"Coalition of Chicago gangsters declares Elliot Ness to be guilty of harassment"
10
posted on
09/22/2004 11:21:51 AM PDT
by
Onelifetogive
(* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
To: MisterRepublican
I'm sure the Kerry Kamp will love this one I wish they would run with it - more lead for their balloon.
11
posted on
09/22/2004 11:22:17 AM PDT
by
trebb
(Ain't God good . . .)
To: demlosers
the use of radioactive depleted uranium weapons of mass destruction
Doesnt depleted mean that it is no longer radioactive?
To: demlosers
...and all civil personnel of the United States would be constitutionally and otherwise... So now they're the ultimate arbiter of our constitution?
13
posted on
09/22/2004 11:23:44 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: MisterRepublican
the use of radioactive depleted uranium weapons of mass destruction , against the people of Afghanistan ; with serious fall out effects on the military personnel of the United States ,UK and other forces deployed ; and on countries, in and around the region.
Evidently this cabal of clowns hasn't clue #1 what DU is ised for nor it's total lack of radioactive properties. This alone tells me this entire "investigation" is a crock.
To: demlosers
Keep 'em coming. This is the reason we didn't opt for the ICC.
To: demlosers
I didn't know that Bagdad (sp) Bob was a judge.
16
posted on
09/22/2004 11:24:52 AM PDT
by
jerri
To: .38sw
I'd like to see them f*cking try...
Bush liberated two countries and ousted a hated dictator...and some kangaroo court calls BUSH the criminal?
17
posted on
09/22/2004 11:24:55 AM PDT
by
RockinRight
(W stands for whoop-a**!!!)
To: demlosers
Hmm, a trial where the defendent does not speak for himself? Yeah....
18
posted on
09/22/2004 11:25:07 AM PDT
by
Lunatic Fringe
(http://www.drunkenbuffoonery.com/mboards/)
To: demlosers
These IDIOTS have no idea what they are talking about...do they?
citizens ,soldiers and all civil personnel of the United States would be constitutionally and otherwise , justified in withdrawing all co-operation from the Defendant and his government
Maybe someone should send them a copy of the US Constitution.
19
posted on
09/22/2004 11:25:36 AM PDT
by
swilhelm73
("I think you can be an honest person and lie about any number of things" -- Dan Rather)
.....heh, no rulings against Osama bin Laden?.....
.....no rulings against Saddam for Crimes against Humanity?...
.....international nutbags!.....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson