BUSH'S COOL RECEPTION ?????

Nealz Nuze ^ | September 22, 2004 | Neal Boortz

[Noachian]

...limits on the power of the state, ...

The one thing that stands out in the UDOHR is the lack of limits on government.

Like all Socialist "Constitutions" the document tells people what they may, or may not, do, but doesn't give them a limited government as our Constitution does.

A constitution based on limited government would never appear in a socialist state because Socialists cannot think in terms of a government that is limited in any way.

If this sounds like the Democrats then you can understand why Democrats are merely Socialists under a different name.

[ride the whirlwind]

President Bush did exactly as he needed to do in the speech. He kept to his word of 3 years ago when he said, ""We will not tire. We will not falter. We will not fail." The anti-Americans in the room don't matter in the long run.

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Its reported that the UN needs a new building...

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Love that last paragraph!

[tiki]

Bush talked about freedom and honorable actions so of course, he didn't get an ecstatic reception. These UN goons have presided over millions of deaths without lifting a hand and in some cases exacerbating the situation.

[tdadams]

I saw a photo that Reuters is running today of Kofi Annan and Bush toasting with a glass of wine.

No doubt the DUmmies will be all over it this morning calling Bush a drunk!

[tdadams]

The one obstacle to this is that it seems almost inconceivable to most people that the United Nations might be disbanded. It's an entrenched institution.

However, the League of Nations, which preceeded the UN, was justifiably disbanded and so too can the UN be disbanded.

Maybe it's a shocking thought now, but people will get used to it.

[MissAmericanPie]

The U.N. needs to be disbanded, and we should close our markets to any nation still propping that corrupt, from the bottom brick up, institution.

If the idea of forming a new organization that only accepts members with elected leaders comes about, the only charter should be the agreement for civil discourse. What does the U.N. need with a Constitution, misnamed "Charter", that claims sovereignty and power?

The U.N. is corrupt and very ambitious, and while so many keep blathering on about how weak it is, it is exerting far more power with Agenda 21 and back door conquests of resources, land, and daily human life than it is entitled to.

Individual governments can employ Agenda 21 to grab land, control resources, and harm the individuals rights to his private property. Biospheres, Clinton's Rivers projects, the denial of cattlemen to graze their cattle, Klamath Falls, all can be laid at the door of politicians using the U.N. Agenda 21 as a tool against the rights of citizens.

[rdb3]

Just one idea to leave you with. Can you imagine what would happen if the United States announced that at some time certain it was going to withdraw from the United Nations and cease all further funding. At that time the United States would form a new international organization loosely modeled after the UN .. but with one huge difference. Only states who's leaders are popularly elected in open and free elections, and who place civilians in charge of the military, will be allowed to join.

Outstanding idea!

$710.96... The price of freedom.
VII-XXIII-MMIV

[agrace]

Just one idea to leave you with. Can you imagine what would happen if the United States announced that at some time certain it was going to withdraw from the United Nations and cease all further funding. At that time the United States would form a new international organization loosely modeled after the UN .. but with one huge difference. Only states who's leaders are popularly elected in open and free elections, and who place civilians in charge of the military, will be allowed to join.

Very good idea.

[School of Rational Thought]

It is my understanding that it is customary at the UN to NOT applaud during a speech.