Posted on 09/21/2004 4:39:13 PM PDT by PretzeLogic
Keep up the good work. We are dealing with internet info here. If seen, considered true.
I keep wondering why if Burkett got the documents 3-4-04, why we have no information on them until 9-3-04 when Mapes claimed source gave them to her.
Would Burkett merely "sit" on them for 6 months? No.
Where were they for 5 months. My suspicion - that they were in the hands of the dems for decisions.
Washington DC Chairman Gillespie made the following comments during todays RNC conference call
Did the Kerry campaign know about the existence of the documents in question in advance of the CBS report? A chronology of events indicates they did.
Bill Burkett says he made multiple contacts with the Kerry campaign in August, sending an e-mail newsletter on August 21 saying he talked to Kerry campaign seniors on Friday, August 20. The Kerry campaign told him they wanted to counterattack, and he says he gave them the information to do it with.
Bill Burkett says he contacted the Democratic National Committee and laid out a rationale for using what he termed down and dirty tactics against President Bush.
We know that the Kerry campaign devised a strategy to attack the Presidents National Guard service that began the same night the Republican National Convention ended, with Senator Kerry attacking the Presidents guard service on the night of September 2.
Two days before the 60 Minutes report aired, Howard Wolfson, a strategist dispatched to the DNC by the Kerry campaign joined the DNC to head up Operation Fortunate Son.
On Wednesday, September 8th, the day of the report, the DNC officially launched Operation Fortunate Son, and Texans For Truth, funded by a Kerry supporter, announced an advertising campaign.
On Thursday, the day after the 60 Minutes report, the DNC distributed an ad that had clearly been prepared in anticipation of the CBS News report, and cited the documents at a DNC press conference where Senator Tom Harkin called the President a liar.
One might argue that these steps were taken without advance knowledge of the existence of the documents and this is all coincidence, but that strains credibility.
CBS has apologized for airing the story based on discredited documents, but has not issued a retraction. One of its producers contacted the Kerry campaign to encourage them to talk to one of her sources who could be helpful to the campaign. Whether this was done as part of an agreement with the source to go public or as a friendly tip, it is entirely inappropriate. Yet CBS News allows to continue in a news gathering and reporting capacity a journalist who, according to yesterdays Associated Press makes no secret of her liberal beliefs and has unquestionably provided opposition research to one of the presidential campaigns.
Other questions that should be answered:
1. We know that CBS put the Kerry campaign in touch with Burkett, but who put Burkett in touch with CBS in the first place? Was it someone at the Kerry campaign, or the DNC?
2. Who were the seniors other than Senator Cleland that Burkett spoke to at the Kerry campaign on August 20? Lockhart wasn't a part of the Kerry campaign on August 20, and neither were McCurry, Begala, Carville or Greenberg. So, who spoke with Burkett on August 20, and to whom did he provide the information for a counterattack?
3. Did the Kerry campaign or the DNC know about the documents before the CBS story broke? If so, from whom did they learn of them?
The centerpiece of the Kerry Campaigns character based critique, Boston-speak for character assassination, is based on a discredited news report that was based on the criminal activity of someone who mocked up and forged documents. Whats that say for the character of the Kerry campaign? " ----------------------------------
New information in red. Note the different date for offical start of Fortunate Son. I had date as 9/15 per MSNBC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.