Skip to comments.
NM JUDGE RECUSES SELF, RESCINDS NADER ORDER.
KKOB radio
| 9/20/2004
| greyfoxx39
Posted on 09/20/2004 8:19:41 AM PDT by greyfoxx39
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
To: Mad Dawgg
The other day here on FR, on the first thread discussing this judge throwing Nader off, someone posted her campaign donations. I'm searching for the thread but having trouble finding it.
41
posted on
09/20/2004 8:57:12 AM PDT
by
agrace
To: greyfoxx39
If you watched Fox News yesterday this was Richardson's big bragging point. That Nadar had been kicked off the NM ballot. What a slimy bunch--getting the corupt courts to decide who we can vote for. Give us the California recall type ballot.
To: All
I have to laugh, someone just called in to Aherns show and said, "The democrats were for Nader before they were against him."
To: austinaero
She will be meeting with Dan Rather soon to tell her story of persecution at the hands of Republicians.
Problem is, Dan won't have any to tell her story to the public.
To: Tijeras_Slim
"BWHAHAHAHA! NM is a wholly owned subsidiary of the DNC."
Spoken like a true long-term NM resident. The political shenanigans in this state, particularly in the judicial systems and county clerk offices, really can take your breath away. I've always considered us to be the second most corrupt state in the union, and all I can say is - thank God for Louisiana!. (Apologies to Louisiana Freepers - I've got several friends down there and this is how I yank their chains).
To: NewMexLurker
thank God for Louisiana!. And Mississippi! Without it, we'd be tops for DWI.
46
posted on
09/20/2004 10:02:23 AM PDT
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Pay no attention to the Nattering Newbies of Negativism)
To: greyfoxx39
State democrats are "saddened". The main stream press is trying to cover this up; The Untold Story of how the democrats tried to keep Nader Off the Ballot.
Gee, I wonder if the shoe was on the other foot and it was Perot and the Republicans were trying to keep him off. As sure as rain - Breaking News.
Media Bias at its Finest.
47
posted on
09/20/2004 10:37:12 AM PDT
by
sr4402
To: greyfoxx39
The power of the FReepers!
48
posted on
09/20/2004 10:38:36 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Dan Rather is a journalist like Michael Moore is a pole vaulter.)
To: All
Another female democrat judge named Teresa Baca just ruled Nader off the ballot, and it seems she donated $250 to the democrat senatorial committee...this would be a big joke, but it seems that today is the deadline for overseas absentee ballots to be mailed out and they're not even printed yet due to the Nader flap. Military ballots will likely be affected by this. More disenfranchisement of the military by the democrats. But the democrats are fighting tooth and nail agains ID being required at the polls because it might "disenfranchise" minorities.
Beam me up, Scotty!
To: greyfoxx39
50
posted on
09/20/2004 4:50:49 PM PDT
by
mickie
To: snooker
You should have seen that scumbag governor of NM on Fox News Sunday gloating about how they had got Nader off the ballot. He was giddy.
It was sick.
The general gist of his comments, "We're glad to deny people the chance to vote for their candidate. So, now they can go vote for ours because we gave them no choice." Most of the Nader hardcore folks will be so turned off by this dirty trick they wouldn't vote Kerry anyway. They'd probably go with Cobb. He's close enough to Communist for them.
Paul
51
posted on
09/20/2004 5:00:11 PM PDT
by
spacewarp
(Visit the American Patriot Party and stay a while. http://www.patriotparty.us)
To: ApesForEvolution
Hey AFE! Are you going to be on the ground again in November?
52
posted on
09/20/2004 5:10:31 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: terilyn
Hey superstar. Stay tuned w/your stune beeber, whatever the heck that is...lol
53
posted on
09/20/2004 11:17:17 PM PDT
by
ApesForEvolution
(DemocRATS are communists and want to destroy America only to replace it with the USSA)
To: The_Victor
What is it about liberals that causes them to only do the right thing after they are caught, and then after doing what they should have done before they were caught, expecting to be given credit for the after-the-fact correction? Lack of character.
To: austinaero
Maybe, maybe not. At least she had the grace to recuse herself. Maybe she actually thought her original order was correct, but when she realized the position she was in, she realized there was a conflict of interest.
I'm all for giving her the benefit of the doubt.
To: austinaero
Maybe, maybe not. At least she had the grace to recuse herself. Maybe she actually thought her original order was correct, but when she realized the position she was in, she realized there was a conflict of interest.
I'm all for giving her the benefit of the doubt.
To: ApesForEvolution
LOL! I'll make sure my beeber is set to stune. Watch out!
I hope that was a yes. We need a November 2004 like we had in November of 2002 here in Liberal Lakes.
57
posted on
09/21/2004 4:11:42 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: greyfoxx39
The stupid thing is that it's looking like Nader won't have any impact on this election at all. Is he getting enough support in any state to tip it to Bush?
(Not that I agree with the assumption that every Nader vote would be a Kerry vote if Nader isn't on the ballot. Much of his commie support believes there is no difference between Kerry and Bush.)
58
posted on
09/21/2004 4:15:00 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson