Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5th Circuit judge blasts Supreme Court’s ruling in Roe v. Wade
Alliance Defense Fund ^ | 9/16/04 | Alliance Defense Fund

Posted on 09/17/2004 7:17:35 PM PDT by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 09/17/2004 7:17:36 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Wow, where's this person been all my life?


2 posted on 09/17/2004 7:19:12 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Justice Jones is right. Abortion is not in the Constitution. Only liberals can find a constitutional right to abortion in the constitution but somehow miss the right to bear arms in the second amendment.


3 posted on 09/17/2004 7:21:16 PM PDT by JeeperFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
En zo, we have now a judge who says the USSC in Roe v. sought to keep women ignorant.

Heck, we knew that. Same with the present court. You have people on there like Souder, to whom women are just "fish", or, as with Ginzburg, not really civilized (like she believes her friends on the European courts are).

4 posted on 09/17/2004 7:22:21 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

She sounds like an excellent person to nominate for a seat on the Supreme Court.


5 posted on 09/17/2004 7:24:53 PM PDT by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Put her on the short list for the Supreme Court


6 posted on 09/17/2004 7:26:11 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1 (Lock-n-load!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeeperFreeper

It goes way beyond just that. There is absolutely no provision in the Constitution for the judicial branch to enact laws. Moreover, there is not even a provision for the courts to "interpret" the Constitution, this was a power grab by John Marshall 200 years ago in Marbury vs. Madison. Logic and a thorough reading of the Constitution would dictate that the executive branch would determine what is lawful and prosecute accordingly.


7 posted on 09/17/2004 7:26:19 PM PDT by wagglebee (Benedict Arnold was for American independence before he was against it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Well it's going to be harder to elevate her to the Supreme Court now.


8 posted on 09/17/2004 7:26:35 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (What did Dan Rather know, and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

But, But, But, the Constitution is a living breathing document............(sarcasm off)


9 posted on 09/17/2004 7:28:42 PM PDT by phil1750 (Love like you've never been hurt;Dance like nobody's watching;PRAY like it's your last prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I agree, I wish pro-life judges would keep these views to themselves until after they are elevated to the SCOTUS.


10 posted on 09/17/2004 7:29:05 PM PDT by wagglebee (Benedict Arnold was for American independence before he was against it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
Judge Jones was President Bush - 41's backup nominee if Justice Thomas' nomination had failed.

She is one of the most brilliant conservative judges in the country. Appointed by President Reagan in the early 1980s.

11 posted on 09/17/2004 7:32:06 PM PDT by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ahban
Exactly, finally we have a judge who will judge, and apply the law, even if it implicates overturning a Dred Scott decison in which the law was abandoned for the zeitgeist.
12 posted on 09/17/2004 7:36:50 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

bump for weekend issue


13 posted on 09/17/2004 7:38:09 PM PDT by newsgatherer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

We [Federalist Society] just brought Justice Jones to speak at our law school. She's brilliant.


14 posted on 09/17/2004 7:43:42 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore

Haven't read it yet, but ping for later.


15 posted on 09/17/2004 7:48:46 PM PDT by no more apples (God Bless our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

You've hit the nail on the head. WE are supposed to have three balanced branches of government, however Marbury vs. Madison sought to bring an imbalance by giving the Judicial branch "Constitution Interpretation" power that was never meant to be theirs alone.


16 posted on 09/17/2004 7:53:41 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
1. The Legislature has the authority/resposibility for making laws and should clearly and emphatically tell the Judiciary its role in interpreting laws has been taken away. Any ambiuity in a law should be resolved by the Legislature, not the Judiciary.

2. The Executive should refuse to honor any 'decisions' handed down by the Judiciary which are at odds with existing legislated law.

17 posted on 09/17/2004 8:02:46 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

That's 'ambiguity', of course.


18 posted on 09/17/2004 8:04:05 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Right on Justice Jones.


19 posted on 09/17/2004 8:04:52 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Rather Lied, MSM Died! Long live FreeRepublic and the Blogs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Right you are. She just failed the litmus test. Which is *EXACTLY* why we have to repeal the litmus test and pickup 60 or 61 in the senate. Then watch the real work begin.

Viva Cristo Rey!


20 posted on 09/17/2004 8:05:30 PM PDT by OriginalChristian (W04 like never before...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson