Troll? Someone that easily offended can't be pro-Bush.
You are unpleasant.
Sexist post's? Ignore them!
The nightly posting of the president's day in pictures can get pretty embarrassing to me, but, I don't complain I let the swooning ladies have some fun.
Eh. There are good men and there are jerkwads (it's the same with women, BTW). Both types exist on FR. You just have to sift through them and let the slimey folk ooze off into the sludgepit where they belong.
May I recommend a temporary "vacation" from FR. It can be quite rejuvenating. :-)
Specfically what are you talking about? What conservative women's perspectives have been ignored?
What Republican and conservative issues can you not embrace? Maybe this will give us a clue to your disenchantment with FR.
Nice opus(sy).
So you're a feminist...
Isn't that cute?
Please define a "woman's perspective on issues." Seems to me there is one perspective on issues that is the right one, and lots of other perspectives which we call "wrong" ones...
Your post does bring up an interesting point, though. Men and women are different in the aggregate. Enter a discussion with a man about a problem, and most times the conversation is a nuts-and-bolts, problem-solving conversation. Do the same with a woman, and far more time is spent on the emotional and personal effect the problem has had on the woman, as opposed to just talking about what will fix the problem.
Now before the resident feminists get all fired up, note that I was careful to say "in the aggregate." I know many women who "think like men," in that they tend to be less interested in the emotional side of things. They tend to be the women who I am much closer friends with, in fact. But overall, I think my generalization is accurate.
However, on a public website like this, I don't think you have any right to expect others to discuss issues in your chosen fashion. The conservative movement of the Republican Party has always been a problem-solving movement (as opposed to liberalism, which focuses far more on feelings rather than outcomes). So you should not be surprised if the discussion here is more "male." Perhaps you should consider being more tolerant? (I couldn't resist...)