Posted on 09/16/2004 2:36:57 PM PDT by swilhelm73
But was she really a secretary or just someone in the typing pool at the base?
If she was Killian's personal secretary, worked in Killian's office, some one would know, assuming everyone else in the know isn't deceased. True, an Andean alpaca herder some 6 degrees of separation away isn't going to know/remember.
She gave the Houston Chronicle two interviews, one on September 14 and the other in the week before. In the first she said she had no real personal knowledge of Bush's situation; in the second she gave extensive derogatory comments about Bush that essentially track what she said to Rather.
In between the two she obviously received "memory restoration therapy" from either CBS or the DNC. So it turns out that CBS and the DNC are using forged documents to implant fake memories in a witness who remembered almost nothing about Bush's service, and then using those faked memories to corrorobate the contents of the same forged documents that were used to "restore" her memories in the first place.
True, but the signatures are forgeries.
"But was she really a secretary or just someone in the typing pool at the base?"
According to Killian's son, she was in a pool of secretaries who did typing for many officers around the base. In addition, why should Killian confide his personal feelings about another officer to one of the secretaries in the pool? This would have been a no-no, and to all accounts, Killian was a very honorable man.
So it seems if we could prove this point based on personnel records from the base, that would pretty much expose her as a fraud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.