Skip to comments.
CONGRESS BIGS NIX PROBE INTO 'RATHERGATE'
New York Post ^
| 9/16/04
| IAN BISHOP
Posted on 09/15/2004 11:39:33 PM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-106 next last
To: kattracks
I agree pragmatically that Congress should stay out of this - because the opportunistic and unprincipled MSM would use it as sledgehammer against the GOP as a case of media repression by the "ruling powers". (snort) Yeah...I wish.
OTOH...these same GOP congressmen damn well better nix any witch hunts against Fox and other conservative-leaning media outlets - or they will be targeted by us - the New Media Viet Cong in our pajamas, as cowardly self-serving RINO's who don't have the principles nor backbone to represent us. Hear that, Barton?
61
posted on
09/16/2004 4:29:16 AM PDT
by
guitfiddlist
(The Left is smart enough to know the truth, but low enough not to care.)
To: HitmanNY
Criminal conduct does not have First Amendment protection. That is a legal fact.
With the exception of Judicial immunity (i.e. I am your Lord and I am above the law), there is NO protection for criminal conduct. Only judges can break the law with impunity and get away with it.
Someone should check to see the donations of these individuals to see if they have received money from CBS / Viacom...
62
posted on
09/16/2004 4:44:31 AM PDT
by
woodb01
(Take out the 'dnC'BS "news" trash... Make dnCBS EXTINCT)
To: HitmanNY
I needed to see that in print. A good reminder, thanks!
63
posted on
09/16/2004 5:02:28 AM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(ZOT 'em all, let MOD sort 'em out!)
To: kattracks
Good. An official investigation is only going to hurt Republicans. Let the media, DNC, and Kerry Campaign all squabble amongst themselves--the mess is not worthy of comment from the Bush Administration and Rove et al. should just sit back and laugh quietly.
64
posted on
09/16/2004 5:02:30 AM PDT
by
dinodino
To: kattracks
I agree.
Let's let it fester first.
I don't want it to be knocked down before the real criminals are discovered.
65
posted on
09/16/2004 5:04:43 AM PDT
by
mabelkitty
(Watch for a CBS employee in a trench coat going by DeepWord.....)
To: Spanaway Lori; HitmanNY
CBS is MAKING the issue all about Dubya not showing up, not doing his duty, while Kerry all the while got himself 3 purple hearts doing his duty in Vietnam! Can the Americans who count on the maindream media for news figure this out? I truly wonder. This is also a good point. While we can't have CBS annointed as a 1stAM martyr, we also allow them to continue the mind-control of The Sheep.
Because, like it or not, The Sheep don't use the Web, The Sheep don't listen to talk radio, or believe anything other than newsprint and the TV - which The Left own.
And we're all trusting The Sheep to vote for GWB in November?
66
posted on
09/16/2004 5:09:03 AM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(ZOT 'em all, let MOD sort 'em out!)
To: HitmanNY
"We don't need a congressional investigation."
The old Media is in the throws of detroying itself. Why would any card carrying member of the VRWC want to interrupt them?
67
posted on
09/16/2004 5:12:49 AM PDT
by
IamConservative
(A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything.)
To: kattracks
Barton's right on the money. Now is not the appropriate time for any sort of Congressional hearing. Should it be found out that CBS "News" *KNOWINGLY* used false documents, or aided in their creation, then appropriate action should be taken.
Overall I'd rather see Congress stay FAR away from this especially since everytime Congress tries to "fix" things with new legislation is only gets worse (Independent Counsel statute, anyone?)!
68
posted on
09/16/2004 5:16:07 AM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(Why are we in Iraq? Just point the whiners here: http://www.massgraves.info)
To: kattracks
I agree with Barton. But I have no problem with Cox calling even more attention to the matter. :-)
69
posted on
09/16/2004 5:18:37 AM PDT
by
Coop
(In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
To: Peach
For crying out loud. If you're doing to Freep Congress, do it for something WORTHY. Freep 'em for their votes this week regarding illegal immigration: efforts to grant social security to illegals and allowing easily-forged, and readily granted,
"Matricula Consular" cards to be used to open banking accounts. These are both PRO-TERRORIST / PRO-ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION votes and REPUBLICANS helped make it so. Especially David Dreier of the House Rules's committee.
70
posted on
09/16/2004 5:21:11 AM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(Why are we in Iraq? Just point the whiners here: http://www.massgraves.info)
To: kattracks
It was a nice blurb for the evening news, but not practical.
But don't worry Congressman Cox, FreeRepublic.com is on the case!
71
posted on
09/16/2004 5:24:54 AM PDT
by
airborne
(God answers all prayers. Sometimes the answer is ,"No".)
To: kattracks
...Barton, who heads the House panel that oversees the telecommunications industry, said the court of public opinion will issue the best verdict...If this act violates federal election laws or other laws then Congress should investigate or the US Attorney General should indict someone.
Are we to try other law breakers in "the court of public opinion"???
72
posted on
09/16/2004 5:34:15 AM PDT
by
FReepaholic
(Proud FR member since 1998. Proud monthly donor.)
To: newzjunkey
...Should it be found out that CBS "News" *KNOWINGLY* used false documents, or aided in their creation, then appropriate action should be taken...If no one investigates (ie Congress or the Attorney General) how is this going to be "found out"?
73
posted on
09/16/2004 5:37:28 AM PDT
by
FReepaholic
(Proud FR member since 1998. Proud monthly donor.)
To: kattracks
I'm with Barton. The government should not stick it's nose into this. There is no "Free Press" at CBS, FOX or anywhere else if government is looking over their shoulder.
What CBS did needs to adjudicated in the court of public opinion.
74
posted on
09/16/2004 5:59:38 AM PDT
by
Drango
(What's the Font, Kenneth?)
To: kattracks
Better off staying out of this and just letting the media find out who did what.
75
posted on
09/16/2004 6:04:21 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(John John Kerry Edwards change positions more often than a Nevada prostitute!!!)
To: kattracks
Ask yourself this. Would the Dems have held hearings if they controlled the house and Fox had done this to Kerry?
House Republicans are acting like chickens.
CBS used forged documents to affect the outcome of a Presidential election. That's not worthy of an investigation? Come on guys, grow a backbone.
76
posted on
09/16/2004 6:08:43 AM PDT
by
handy
(Forgive me this day, my daily typos...The Truth is not a Smear!)
To: kattracks
Barton, who heads the House panel that oversees the telecommunications industry, said the court of public opinion will issue the best verdict. IMHO, this is exactly the position to be taken. Cox was wrong to bring this up in the first place.
"Rathergate" has very weak legs at this point. Rather el al have been thoroughly discredited.
77
posted on
09/16/2004 6:12:49 AM PDT
by
upchuck
(You do know that the Tasmanians, who never committed adultery, are now extinct, don't you?)
To: newzjunkey
Barton's right on the money. Now is not the appropriate time for any sort of Congressional hearing. Should it be found out that CBS "News" *KNOWINGLY* used false documents, or aided in their creation, then appropriate action should be taken. Barton is dead wrong on this. Washington Post has already reported that CBS ignored warning from experts that the documents would not hold up. They *DID* *KNOWINGLY* use false documents. Why are these guys so afraid?
"When the enemy is destroying itself, stay out of the way" does not cut it. Why is this happening? Because of PRESSURE from talk radio & the blogs. So wouldn't MORE pressure (subpoena pressure) be a good thing?
78
posted on
09/16/2004 6:17:37 AM PDT
by
handy
(Forgive me this day, my daily typos...The Truth is not a Smear!)
To: kattracks
I agree there shouldn't be an investigation. But the Republicans should pull up their socks and refuse Democrat demands for similar investigations on the other side for which there is far less evidence that a crime has been committed.
79
posted on
09/16/2004 6:21:37 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Anti-Christ is Hillary
"However, it was totally appropriate for them to hold an investigation over Fox News and brow beat an owner of a radio station for refusing to play the Dixie Chicks."
Thanks for remembering that.
80
posted on
09/16/2004 6:22:41 AM PDT
by
Rebelbase
("let them go naked for a while"...Theraaazaaaaa Heinz-Kerry)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-106 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson